RE:WHY WILL RICH, MIDDLE CLASS MUSLIMS WILL BE PAID MONEY, FACILITIES AT THE COST OF POOR HINDUS?
by rajesh on Dec 23, 2007 10:55 PM Permalink
why not give subsidy to hindus going to kailash. why giving subsidy to haj
RE:WHY WILL RICH, MIDDLE CLASS MUSLIMS WILL BE PAID MONEY, FACILITIES AT THE COST OF POOR HINDUS?
by Kris Trivedi on Dec 23, 2007 11:01 PM Permalink
MODI STANDS FOR M - man O - of D - Divine I - Intellegence
my heartly congrates to narednra modi. Againgst all odds he fought bravely. Everybody were against him like sonia gandhi;english media. He has done wonderful job. Hats off to modi.
Narendra Modi's resounding victory is a big slap on the face of Congress party,Pseudoseculars and English media. But knowing their credentials it is not surprising that they are not accepting Modi's victory in right perspective.Modi won because 1.He is a man of impeccable integrity,a unique honest politician. 2. He is commited to development of people and has a vision for development. 3.He has the political will to implement his dream projects and has the guts and courage to keep vested interests and middlemen out of government even when they were from his own party and/or Sangh pariwaar. 4.He is bold in taking strong decisions because he is not corrupt and he doesn't care what his opponents and detractors say about his decisions as long as they are in the interest of people. 5.In contrast to a very weak central government leadership(Manmohan Singh,Our PM)he appears to be a masculine leader who is capable of dealing with terrorists and anti-India forces well. But unfortunately these psuedosecularists are once again attributing his victory to Moditwa/Hindutwa and thus insulting the mandate as well as wisdom of common Gujratis.Here I'll request these people please don't insult Gujrat and Gujratis just to settle your own score with Modi.Give Modi a clean slate and let him start a new inning without any baggage from past and let Gujrat show the way to India about all inclusive growth and development.Please co operate and contribute to the prosperity of Gujrat and India,
Congress reaction lines are always ready IF CONGRESS FARES WELL ITS SONIA VICTORY, IF CONGRESS FARES BADLY THEN IT THE LOCAL CONGRESS LEADERS ARE RESPONSIBLE! Congress unleashed brazen Sonia in to Gujarat polls. After her miserable failure, Sibals & Singhvis are now in Save Sonia mission. They will now say that Sonia is national leader and a state election results are not testimony to her popularity. It is like saying you made me bite the dust, but Im. still the winner! Sonia bought and used the media to fight Modi. NOw she is hiding from the same media.
It is sure that Gujarat Elections have reduced Sonia to be a losing regional satrap and Narendra Modi to be a triumphant national leader, who will be out future prime minister.
RE:RE:SONIA HIDING FROM MEDIA-AS USUAL
by rajesh on Dec 23, 2007 10:43 PM Permalink
perfect dude. those congress leadwers were telling in all news channels that in spite of sonia pulling up large crowds in meeting the local congress ppl failed to convert them into votes. thats wat congress is. useless
RE:RE:RE:SONIA HIDING FROM MEDIA-AS USUAL
by shailesh bhayade on Dec 23, 2007 10:51 PM Permalink
Yes, if congress gives credit to sania for winning any Panchayat election Then for defeat also they accept the responsibility.
RE:SONIA HIDING FROM MEDIA-AS USUAL
by Candid Man on Dec 23, 2007 10:51 PM Permalink
You are certainely right...Sonia got failed in Gujrat....It was Sonia Vs Modi. She tried her the best ever to dive for rally....but all in vain except 10 seats extra...I think she should take rsponsibility for this defeat & put the papers from the post of president CWC....Next blow will be coming in Himachal for Congrss soon....ALL the Best to Congress. Modi should be transformed to centre in future.
who ever is talking about the Gujrat still talk about the 2002. Most of Indian dont know that Gujrat is one of best Finanacially managed states in India (facts supressed by Centre for obvious reasons.
But what happened in Nandigram? Is not CPM and their partners are responsinble for killings there and creating a terror? Rather I would say, Communists are the mother of all the terrorists activities that we Indians are facing today. Remember Charu Majumdar, a Communist party member who started the Naxalite movement in India. He is the father of all violence in India and on what basis people shout from roof top (mostly left leanings) that Modi is bad man!!!!!!!!! its amazing! This can only happen in India.
We have more than 100 years old party but unfortunately could not find a Indian Born leader to lead them!!!!!!!! (their leader took long time to apply for Indian Citizenship). We should be ashamed of ourselves! But fortunately Indians are clever and know who is there person and who is outsider.
Coming to Gujrat, it is nothing but the stamp on the positive attitude of the government and should shut permanently the anti-Modi shouting brigade (so called NGOs and Socialites surviving on aids from anti-India forces)who keep appearing on TV (mostly left leaning). Rather these people should be tried in Court of Law for Anti Indian Activities.
Llet the people like Modi be in all over the Government and will not take much time to take India as no 1 contry in all segments.
RE:Looking for roommates/rentals/tenants?
by rajesh on Dec 23, 2007 10:38 PM Permalink
dude u can ask this for gujarat congress leaders. they need it urgently
I think Mr. Manmohan Singhji should write a letter to Bush stating that he country has no right to reject business visa for Mr. Modiji. I propose to imply tax on all imported goods by 1000% and no export to USA espicially....because that is country of foooooooools. Jai Hind Jai Swadeshi
RE:USA Bush and Swadeshi Modi
by You yourself on Dec 23, 2007 10:40 PM Permalink
I don't agree. I think we should not be interested in going to a hostile country. They see pakis as their allies. They created the mujahiddeen to fight the Russians. Why should we want to go to the US? The days of US hegemony are over. They will beg to visit India after a few decades.
