Weak people shout and fight, strong people keep quite and his when needed or manage thing in other ways then fighting....
We need a strong India as well as friendly relations with anybody & everybody (for our own benefits).
Making our self strong and still manage friendly relation (atleast from outside) both an be managed simultaneously where is we are doing just opposite -
Shouting against them and not working to make ourselves strong ?
Mr. Bharat has rightly pointed out the weakness of India. Truly we are sleeping or pretending to be sleeping. Mere development of IT is not sufficient for India. In these modern times, no country afford to attack any other country militarily ( except headstrong US) It is a proxy war. It is going on and it has been going since long. How many of us are really bothered about our country ? Does any one getup and pay respect when our national song is heard ? How many really feel about the country ? It is high time political leadership wakeup and do something about this. Political leadership is busy amassing wealth which any is not useful to this country as it is transferred to some other country. Do we need dictatorship like China to develop ? We are weak because we are democratic ? Corruption has crept in to Defence services and any thing can be bought if money is paid. Low quality ammunition to defence forces and Police forces ? At what cost ? At whose cost ? Jaago India !!! Jaago Indians !!!
D. Goel , Pkl., afternoon 2.25pm.Saturday, 13th June ,2009. The detailed review of Chinese Game plan played by devoted Marxist Mao Dze Dong from Chinese Philosopher of War Sun Tzu who advises to win by means other than combat and largely by psychological innuendos.We in our Gandhian unrealistic apprehensions of of our So-called Gandhian Satyagraha's effectiveness in getting Transfer of Power after Partition in 1947 made us constitutionally incapable of seeing our place vis-a vis Chinese irredentism and realpolitik.Our voluble and theory soaked Nehruvians lectured to World Fora of Peace and brotherhood with false posturing , while the Chinese were creating their grid lock around the entire South Asia by their surreptitious bluff & bluster and suborning neighbours to fall in their Garland of Pearls , or Noose around our Indian Necks,We have to be Real , to face the Dragon and the Ghosts of Sun Tzu / MaoD .Goel
I suppose the first and foremost thing we should do and which is entirely in our control is to stop buying any thing that has a made/assembled in china tag... lets stop helping them earn revenue that would eventually be used against us...
Re: The Proxy War and the threat
by amit on Jun 26, 2009 04:48 PM Permalink
i agree to ur point as that would be a good reply to china and yes tibet is the master stroke of china and they would deploy all there fire power just on our wall and fight in our heart and beizing being safe far away
We should hire polititions from Israel. So that he will take decesion agressively and cleverly. Our polititions are like shit. They will just think about money in their pocket. not about country. It is not that far when china will take all north-east part, pakistan will take west part.
Re: Re: How tackle china
by Shyam Bajekal on Jun 13, 2009 07:24 PM Permalink
I already do that since quite some time and have always believed that George Fernandes was right when he made the famous statement about China being our main threat. That time everyone ridiculed him, now everyone agrees. Let's hope our politicians today do not sleep and instead take some agressive steps.
As I believes that some peoples in Delhi parliament thinks that they are the only, who drives our nation but my thinking is that they actually rule our democratic country like Hitler's way. I am suggesting to all that can we take all the system in our hand because we are the real owner of our country and all others are only under us. Then which thing becomes a hurdle for us?. i.e we want bigger problems,war with country like China so that we can improve accordingly. Let's allow china whatever they can do against our country. After all we invest heavily in our defense sector but could not used as per requirements. Let's allow china to help us what ever we have ,can deliver to them. And remember one thing if China is China then Bharat is a PraChina. India must change its policy and go towards Hindustan which also include Tibet and aksai-chin.That is our part and not the china. We now requires very aggressive strategies and a powerful leader
China is trying all possible options to destabilise India. Because it knows that in future it is only India which can be a competition to India.
China is a much bigger threat than Pakistan. It supports Pakistani terrorist groups to attack India, provide them nuclear technology and also ammunition.
At the same time, it is selling all cheap medicines in western world with Made In India tags.
It provide Indian missionaries a handsome amount of money to convert people and thereby promoting conflict within people. Everyone knows that once missionary convert anyone, majority of them take extremist path and hate Hinduism. China is a big contributor to Indian missionaries apart from Europe and US.
While China defeating India, Sri Lanka will run to Chinese side, since both are buddhist. At that India feel the pain of tamil genocide being jointly done along with Sri Lankan Army
I completely agree with Bharat. I wish printed copies of this article is circulated to MPs so that they realize that they will not exist if China takes on India. To add to what Mr.Bharat writes I would say China would be keep to grab kashmir, Nepal, Arunachal Pradesh but it would stop there. Although China is 10 times more powerfull then what we are today, at the back of the mind it realizes that India has nuclear weapons. If it tries to take us head-on India will have no option but to use the nuclear weaopons. I am sure China would not want a nuke dropped on its people. It is a fact our MPs dont have brains to use for strategic missions so all we can do is pray that god gives them some brains. I would also not mind giving USA the biggest millitary base outside USA on Indian soil to foil chinese ambhitions for Asia. Better to be rules by americans then chinese.
Re: Dragon is roaring
by abhay bisen on Jun 12, 2009 07:08 PM Permalink
Wow what a thought , first don't understemate India and Indians that much less , yes truly china is ahead but not that much to take on India , 1962 was diff. Story now Indian force and technology is much advance , and at least i will not prefer to be under any foreigners rule or allow to make foreigners troops to make any base here , keep it for yourself , if China had that guds then i may have acieved those territories much earlier , we have enough Nuclear war hads to hit them to stone age and i.e. what Chinies will not to take risk .
Re: Re: Dragon is roaring
by shyam ale on Feb 11, 2011 04:35 PM Permalink
ya my fren.........1962 was diff. But China is More Powerful than 1962. Its Navy is world biggest and it Military is also World Biggest. They are Modernizing it Military which threats USA too. Actually without any bias India is more Inferior than 1962. China was Poor and less equipped at that time. They have no Air Force.....but now they built there won Fighter Plans. They are working on Stealth Fighter Plane J-20. We must know the truth before bashing without any knowledge. China spend $80 Billion which is actually less shown they spent $150-$200 billion which is less than USA but 2nd in the world. USA is in debt and China owns USA by $2 trillion. 80% product in USA ........ "Made in China". 70% world product supplied in almost countries "Made in China".
May friendship prevail to Both Countries. Coz if China and India be good friend than USA will go Crazy and these two Asian giants will rule the world.
Re: Re: Dragon is roaring
by Shyam Bajekal on Jun 13, 2009 07:27 PM Permalink
I wouldn't count on that what with USA today favouring China due to its extreme dependence on the latter for all its day to day survival goods. You should visit USA to see what I'm saying. Everywhere you go you see 'Made in China' labels
