RE:India interferes
by Julius on Mar 26, 2008 02:52 AM Permalink
u chinks have no individuality! bunch of guys sit at the top of commie party forever and u keep eating their sh1t! In 50 years u'll have no women left in ur country and all will be gays with no more reproduction! Temporary glory! World can get rid of Chink menace without a war!
RE:Rajeev Srinivasan
by Prashant on Mar 26, 2008 02:55 AM Permalink
I am not commie neither chinese.. but RSS wallah just keep blaming others. what they did when they were in power? Vajapayee kept his tail betn legs when he visited china. They did not allow dalai lama to visit some of the functions in india because of chinese fear. And what about kargil..? kandahar..
Just paying balme game doesnt help. When did BJP came and stood against china?
This guys reads one book from some french and rediff publishes his article like he is an expert on tibet.
Does even RSS have balls to support Tibet movement? have they ever wrote a single word in their mouthpiece in it?
Dont just blame others kabhi apane gareban me bhi zankkar dekho.
RE:Rajeev Srinivasan
by DM on Mar 26, 2008 03:59 AM Permalink
Well sir.. be senispble and go and read some unbiased history books which not written by flukes paid by congress.. ppl like you dont deserve democracy.. you always need royal bloodlines to be on your heads.
RE:Tibet is part of china
by SardarPaterl on Mar 26, 2008 02:12 AM Permalink
abhe oo chinki saale.. you chinese are the worst humans in the world. you have no sense of humanity at all; this you guys have shown time and again. If you had a chance you would even claim India as your territory.. shut your mouth and mind your own ass
RE:RE:Tibet is part of china
by on Mar 26, 2008 02:23 AM Permalink
I admire that India is a great country. Just some people in india do not deserve being a human.
RE:Tibet is part of china
by Julius on Mar 26, 2008 02:55 AM Permalink
A chink like u have the freedom to come to come to Indian media forum and write this! Do u have the freedom to write anything againt Ur chink country?
RE:Tibet is part of china
by Julius on Mar 26, 2008 02:45 AM Permalink
Chinks are backstabbers! They'll eventually claim every inch on earth (starting from India) possible unless something happens in this world to stop them.
RE:Tibet is part of china
by sasidhar v on Mar 26, 2008 01:54 AM Permalink
U stupid Guy ! Mongols ruled chinese most part of the history. So china should not exist should becom epart of Mongolia !
RE:Tibet is part of china
by on Mar 26, 2008 02:20 AM Permalink
you stupid. Mogols were driven to the desert in 1368 by chinese Han people. you should learn some chinese history before showing your stupidity.
RE:hahahahahahahhahaha
by spindoc on Mar 26, 2008 01:09 AM Permalink
you phucking kunfu Lee..i will take way one chopstick from y'all chinese..u know what your confucius has said "Man with one chopstick go hungry" .Hunger will kill you to death like what Mao did
RE:hahahahahahahhahaha
by Julius on Mar 26, 2008 02:51 AM Permalink
u chinks have no individuality! bunch of guys sit at the top of commie party forever and u keep eating their sh1t! In 50 years u'll have no women left in ur country and all will be gays with no more reproduction! Temporary glory! World can get rid of Chink menace without a war!
RE:hahahahahahahhahaha
by Indian Analyst on Mar 26, 2008 01:04 AM Permalink
The mighty chinese empire shits everytime Dalai Lama speaks ! China appears weak when it cannot confront Non-Violent protests.
The bricks of the great wall of china will melt from tears of the Tibetans.
RE:Internal Matters of the state
by Ubuntu Bhai on Mar 26, 2008 01:56 AM Permalink
Are you nuts? Go to Sri Lanka's shitty websites to post your crap...you weed from a messed up country..check out your own country before telling other to do..in short Mind your Business..
RE:Internal Matters of the state
by Indian Analyst on Mar 26, 2008 12:57 AM Permalink
-India does not arm Sri Lanka's enemies -India Does not desire even an inch of Sri Lankan territories.
-India is not a cultural threat to Sri Lanka.
Bangladesh: -India interfered in bangladesh after 3 million hindus were killed. Too late. -Bangladesh trains and hosts terrorists against India.
It's a matter of time before maoists enter Sri Lanka.
RE:Internal Matters of the state
by Shesh Lak on Mar 26, 2008 12:58 AM Permalink
Patriot, Do hell with your ideology. India never interfered into Lanka's politics. More over India helped lankan govt. against LTTE. First of all, you need a proper education, you knowledge of history is very weak. Chinese don't the balls any more to think of a fight with India. China have very well known border dispute with almost all of its neighbors and Arunachal pradesh was always a part of India. Teri kgand mein goli maar deni chahiye haramkhor.
RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:35 AM Permalink
you are a terrorist for wanting to hang me.
Go read up the history of negotiations between Britain and China. This was way before 1949. Britain took part of Tibet and incorporated that into India. It belongs to China.
RE:China and Tibet
by Vishnu Sharma on Mar 26, 2008 12:33 AM Permalink
Shut up you chinese agent. Your logic is moronic. Even Japanese look oriental. That does not mean Japan should be part of china.
RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:40 AM Permalink
you are moron. My argument is that Tibetans and Tawang people are Chinese. They should be part of China rather than India because their racial make up is Chinese not Indian. But it seems that it would be hard for you to understand given your substandard education.
RE:RE:China and Tibet
by Indian Analyst on Mar 26, 2008 01:10 AM Permalink
Patriot, SriLankans look like indians and have originated from India. Does this mean that India owns you ??? Sri Lankans have a distinct history, culture and country, Just like tibetans. There is no question of Tibet being part of India. Culturally it feels closer to India, thats all.
RE:China and Tibet
by sasidhar v on Mar 26, 2008 12:35 AM Permalink
Where u have read Britain and china had some deal ? China got independence in 1949 after india. So no question of dealing with britain for border issues. Also Karnataka was formed in 1956. So the karnataka was ruled by manu rulers in the past like mauryans Ashoke. By writing without knwoing facts and name u look like jihadi type.
RE:RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:36 AM Permalink
The Simla Convention of 1914 In 1914, representatives of China, Tibet and Britain negotiated a treaty in India: the Simla Convention. During the convention, the British tried to divide Tibet into Inner and Outer Tibet. When negotiations broke down over the specific boundary between Inner and Outer, the British demanded instead to advance their line of control, enabling them to annex 9,000 square kilometers of traditional Tibetan territory in southern Tibet i.e Tawang region, which corresponds to the north-west parts of modern Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, while recognizing Chinese suzerainty over Tibet[71] and affirming the latter's status as part of Chinese territory, with a promise from the Government of China that Tibet will not be converted into a Chinese province.[72][73] Tibetan representatives signed without Chinese approval, more so as an act of defiance now that the Chinese army had left; after the collapse of Chinese authority in Tibet in 1912. China maintains that it was signed under British pressure; however, the representative of China's central government declared that the secretive annexation of territory was not acceptable. The boundary established in the convention, the McMahon Line, was considered by the British and later the independent Indian government to be the boundary; however, the Chinese view since then has been that since China, which had suzerainty over Tibet, did not sign the treaty, the treaty was meaningless, and the annexation and control
RE:RE:RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:37 AM Permalink
so according to the above, Britain annexed a part of Tibet which is a part of China. That annexed part is in AP today.
RE:China and Tibet
by sasidhar v on Mar 26, 2008 12:34 AM Permalink
Where u have read Britain and china had some deal ? China got independence in 1949 after india. So no question of dealing with britain for border issues. Also Karnataka was formed in 1956. So the karnataka was ruled by manu rulers in the past like mauryans Ashoke. By writing without knwoing facts and name u look like jihadi type.
