RE:Jainism and Buddhism
by Ravi mhatre on Mar 13, 2008 03:50 PM Permalink
Terrorism spread among islam is like bird flue spread among birds there is only one solution to CULL.
RE:Jainism and Buddhism
by Nanchil on Mar 13, 2008 03:30 PM Permalink
People are happy to talk about muslim invasion but never think about persecution on jains and buddhists.
When I said Muslims came to plunder India, some people did not accept that. They said it is "biased" history. So, I picked it up from wikipedia and posted it.
RE:RE:Jainism and Buddhism
by Nanchil on Mar 13, 2008 03:31 PM Permalink
Not only muslism almost all the kings including shivaji irrespective of religion have plundered during war.
Lalu is a shit i agree Mulayam is bigger than him... Similar way other politicians who are hindus...
Lets say Modi is like Hitler... Let's say RSS/VHP are fanatic groups..
now you prove that you muslims are perfect well educated, want peace none of them are terrorist... You prove you guys best and perfect conributing to society's development helping other religions charity work, islaam is religion of peace we will stop discussing on this board
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Frelancer on Mar 13, 2008 03:28 PM Permalink
You Hindus are very hypocrites. When it comes to show the mirror to your community then you try to establish alibis. Every one is aware that In Mumbai riots and in Gujarat riots many innocent Muslims have been killed. You people only shouts slogans against terrorism and call yourself cultured and tolerant people. But radical Hinduism is killing thousand of people in India every year. What coverage our media gives to killing of minorities and lower cast Hindus by upper cast.
Killing of any human being is the greatest sing of mankind. You all should understand that. Then whoever is killing them whether it is Hindu or Muslim should be brought to Justice. Instead of giving justice to people you idiots are discriminating them on the basis of cast and religion. People you should be hanged first to bring justice to innocent
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Frelancer on Mar 13, 2008 03:38 PM Permalink
zmachu Then why is a hue and cry in hanging terrorist Modi,,, Any justification...???
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Frelancer on Mar 13, 2008 03:36 PM Permalink
Dheeraj Akula When you guys will understand that Hindus are the poineer of terrorism in india,,,, By the way you said you live in hyd is it not right that police pick up the innocents from old city to cover the their patches blasted by RSS elements,,,,???
RE:RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Rationalist on Mar 13, 2008 03:49 PM Permalink
Any body who follows Islam cannot be innocent. Every muslim is a potential terrorist until he is illuminated by Quran The terror manual.
RE:RE:RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Frelancer on Mar 13, 2008 03:52 PM Permalink
Rationalist Well Any body who follows Hinduism cannot be innocent. Every Hindu is a potential Rioter until he is illuminated from those filthy books,,
RE:RE:RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by avinash on Mar 13, 2008 03:45 PM Permalink
If muslims are killed they are innocent! What about the killing of those who were murdered in retaliation of babri demolition in Mumbai? What about those who were charred to death in Sabarmati express?
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Frelancer on Mar 13, 2008 03:47 PM Permalink
avinash Do you admit that Hindus are the poineer of Riots in india or not....???
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Imran on Mar 13, 2008 03:25 PM Permalink
First tell me before Babri masjiod demolition how many blasts were done by Muslims to target hindus. Werent we living peacefully until the BJP and congress destroyed babari masjid. Majority of the people killed during the riots were muslims bcoz the police openly supported the hindus. As far as the bomb blasts are concerned most were done by the Kashmir militants which has nothing to do with Indian muslims. Majority of the muslims are just worried about their daily bread and nothing else.
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Imran on Mar 13, 2008 03:41 PM Permalink
Dude if u want to compare what happened ages back when there were rulers and now when there is a democracy u are doing injustice. Will it be right if the police catches u for a murder say ur great grandfather committed. Kashmir problem is for kashmiris to sort out not Indian muslims.
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Imran on Mar 13, 2008 03:51 PM Permalink
Kashmir muslims are fighting their for their own goals so why should the other Muslims get blamed for the acts of terrorists.
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by Rationalist on Mar 13, 2008 03:45 PM Permalink
What about ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Pak,J& K, Bangladesh.Was that before or after Babri demlition?
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by avinash on Mar 13, 2008 03:37 PM Permalink
Imran , You seems to be of 20 years of age. You dont know perhaps the Bhiwandi riots and reasons behind those riots. I would also advise you to go through the details of historical Vile parle bye election contested by Ramesh Prabhu of Shiv Sena. I would also advise you to check the period of Babri Demolition and Shahabano episode.
RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by tka on Mar 13, 2008 03:58 PM Permalink
Imran - you are wrong! You cannot have selective amnesia and choose a period of reference that suits you.
Firstly, for eg. gujarat has witnessed riots even since 1969 in the recent past (not talking about the 1000's and temples destroyed before that). In most of the riots, it was proved (as per official records in Delhi) that these riots were initiated by muslim groups and almost everytime more hindus died. Second - Kashmir is an integral part of India and I warn you to not talk about it as a separate entity. Third - Muslim infiltration from bangladesh has been going on for ever and a lot of them are rabble rousers who are protected by muslim groups and parties like the left front. Fourth - History of islam is filled with more bloodshed than any other religion. Many muslim author books will tell you that and you know that too. Dont blame all problems to babri masjid - that masjid was itslef built on hindu temple and you cannot choose your period of reference that suits your case.
RE:RE:Prove muslims are nice and not terrorist
by veera kumar on Mar 13, 2008 03:33 PM Permalink
u throwed shit on us for 100 of years ,time for u to give it back
Increase in the world religions from 1934 to 1984...
An article in Reader's Digest 'Almanac', year book 1986, gave the statistics of the increase of percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century from 1934 to 1984. This article also appeared in 'The Plain Truth' magazine. At the top was Islam, which increased by 235percent, and Christianity had increased only by 47percent.
RE:Gyan Vedi.
by Lalu Mulayam on Mar 13, 2008 03:31 PM Permalink
You are corect "The Brain" I agree 100%. Look what kind of people emraced Islaam and christianity, most of them from African countries. very few from western world.. in India yes major conevrsion was in christianity and muslims ver less conversion Look at the conversion what kind of people were converted...
now there is reverse conversion going on in African countries.. Islaam to christians...
RE:Gyan Vedi.
by veera kumar on Mar 13, 2008 03:24 PM Permalink
two idiotic religions screwing up the world .......and fighting as who has the largest number of scape goats ....ha hah ha
RE:Gyan Vedi.
by Lalu Mulayam on Mar 13, 2008 03:39 PM Permalink
Quality People "The Brain " mulla.. look at jews they are 160 millions in thsi world.. they are quality people, they control economy and technology... learn from them surrounded by 22 islamic countries.. you don't have guts.. to touch them...
Indian "secular" historians may distort history, but the wikipedia confirms that the barbarians plundered the region merely to spread their stupid religion. They conquered the regions in the name of Islam:
"In the 7th century AD, Arab armies brought the new religion of Islam to the region but were unable to succeed in fully converting the population. In 870 AD, Yaqub ibn Layth Saffari, a local ruler of the Saffarid dynasty in Seistan, conquered Kandahar and the rest of the nearby regions in the name of Islam. Dupree writes:
... Arab armies carrying the banner of Islam came out of the west to defeat the Sasanians in 642 AD and then they marched with confidence to the east. On the western periphery of the Afghan area the princes of Herat and Seistan gave way to rule by Arab governors but in the east, in the mountains, cities submitted only to rise in revolt and the hastily converted returned to their old beliefs once the armies passed. The harshness and avariciousness of Arab rule produced such unrest, however, that once the waning power of the Caliphate became apparent, native rulers once again established themselves independent. Among these the Saffarids of Seistan shone briefly in the Afghan area. The fanatic founder of this dynasty, the coppersmith%u2019s apprentice Yaqub ibn Layth Saffari, came forth from his capital at Zaranj in 870 AD and marched through Bost, Kandahar, Ghazni, Kabul, Bamiyan, Balkh and Herat, conquering in the name of Islam ..."
RE:Indian secularists may distort history, but
by Nanchil on Mar 13, 2008 03:15 PM Permalink
How was buddhism and jainism almost eliminated from India? What happened to thousands of buddhist and jain temples built across the country?
RE:Indian secularists may distort history, but
by veera kumar on Mar 13, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
go and ask foolish muslim invaders who burnt and destroyed nalanda to taxilla university ...
RE:Indian secularists may distort history, but
by The Brain on Mar 13, 2008 03:20 PM Permalink
anyone can write or contribute In wikipedia.. even i can write any article for it, but what is the reference and authentication.
RE:Indian secularists may distort history, but
by The Brain on Mar 13, 2008 03:24 PM Permalink
well, than i can show you Indian history book which states that Aurangzeb was good man, will you agree to it.
i think it is time to stop this foolish taboo on cow slaughter. it is just another animal domesticated by man. Moreover, it is a good source of protein for the vast majority of the poor in india. This aspect of Hindu fanaticism is just as foolish as the muslims banning music and arts.
RE:Cow slaughter
by You yourself on Mar 13, 2008 03:16 PM Permalink
We are all animals domesticated by other humans. Islam and xtianity is fanatic and violent, and that is why you remain backward.
RE:NO WORK...come to rediff........LOL
by RyaN on Mar 13, 2008 03:07 PM Permalink
learning quran is not an easy option...misinterpreting quran wid few verses is very easy..hope u got it
RE:NO WORK...come to rediff........LOL
by veera kumar on Mar 13, 2008 03:12 PM Permalink
tell this to majority of Muslims who misinterpret quran and harm us .....hope u got it
RE:NO WORK...come to rediff........LOL
by RyaN on Mar 13, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
u can say a minor portion of muslims..tat would be more accurate...n i believe this "minor portion" exists in every religion..still u didn't got!
RE:NO WORK...come to rediff........LOL
by veera kumar on Mar 13, 2008 03:22 PM Permalink
pls show me that minor portion in jains and siks of India .....
RE:Impression
by Imran on Mar 13, 2008 03:09 PM Permalink
This Lalu is worse than shit he belives in r&ping innocent women he is a criminal in the making.
RE:RE:Impression
by Nostra Damus on Mar 13, 2008 03:15 PM Permalink
Yes you are right, he should become a good human being like Afzal Guru, Sohrabuddin, Dawood Ibrahim etc. !
RE:Impression
by Lalu Mulayam on Mar 13, 2008 03:20 PM Permalink
Lalu is a shit i agree Mulayam is bigger than him... Similar way other politicians who are hindus...
Lets say Modi is like Hitler... Let's say RSS/VHP are fanatic groups..
now you prove that you muslims are perfect well educated, want peace none of them are terrorist... You prove you guys are we will stop discussing on this board
RE:Impression
by Nostra Damus on Mar 13, 2008 03:14 PM Permalink
Modi is not a terrorist. He was just tough on terrorist criminals. The fact is that a hindu guy suddenly showing some spine in facing terrorists is a bit hard to digest for the parasitic socialites and chattering classes who do not need to work for their living as the vast majority has to.
