who is promoting enemity 1. even now the media dig out all fictional things about the godhra incident and forget the 60 passengers who were charred to death in the sabarmathi express 2. where all the politicians were ? when the hindus were charred to deaths. when there is a casulaty in the minority communities they make huge hue and cry 3. what happened to the sha bano case .... it was just a drop out to protect the muslim vote bank for the congress. 4. just look back the pages of history during partition of india... how many hindus were killed.
5. should the hindus keep quiet for all the violences and attrocities made against them.
the media and the 'so called ' intelltectual genuis call this as secular which is exacty anti hindu...
india is the democratic country where all hindus are like outcasts
RE:We must make Advani the PM
by anj30 on Mar 07, 2008 04:10 PM Permalink
aa bail mujhe maar(Kaat), would you vote for people who want to finish you off man you should be crazy,
Many people in India do not know that Kashi and mathura are destroyed. They do not know Aurangzeb destroyed Kashi and built a mosque there. If some one tells these things then it becomes communal. How can you expect the communities to like each other when lot of things are hidden. They will come out some time and fights will start. Best way is to let everything be in open. At least some one can agree that mistakes were done in the past. This is the way to resolve the enimity. Not putting it in closet and shouting anyone who opens it as communal.
RE:Good they stopped the exhibition. It is in news now.
by on Mar 07, 2008 04:04 PM Permalink
Everyone, including Muslims are aware of Aurangzebs atrocities. I being a Muslims strongly condemn what he did. But the fact is, that the exhibition may have led to communal problems and that is why it was stopped. It was NOT stopped to hide what he did, or justify his acts. Nobody is denying what he did and how much he destroyed. But we need to think and act considering todays situation. If communal problems arise, it is the poor innocents who suffer (from both communities).
RE:Good they stopped the exhibition. It is in news now.
by Supersecualirist on Mar 07, 2008 06:50 PM Permalink
If you strongly condemn then all you people collectively make representation to your Mullah group to hand over back the three important Hindu sites at Kashi and Mathura where Mosques have been built after demolishing the temples and Ayodhya.
Earlier from late 1990 to 2004, our media were trying to create rift bet Advani & Vajpayee. They were trying all the news like pro-advani, pro-vajpayee groups in BJP. But, till now Advani & Vajpayee are good friends. Now that Vajpayee has retired, our Sickular media wants to continue that as Modi Vs Advani. But, Modi has already stated clearly that his boundary is upto Gujrat. Then why do you people separate Modi & BJP. Just remember the analysis carried out in pseudo secular channels after BJP won in Gujrat The topic was---Who is the real loser of Gujrat election? - BJP or Advani or Rajnath... Those idiots dont want to say that it Congress - the real loser. They divert the topic to find losers amongst winners and never acknowledge that Congress was loser.
If they had written the real history you would me Mohan instead of Momin. You chirping like bird today be'coz we have a false, socialised and secularised history imbibed with Notorious slogans used for propaganda like Hindu,mus,sikh isai bhai-bhai.
Has it had been filled with truth things would had been 1000 times better from the present day conditions.
RE:Sikular India
by apurva singh on Mar 07, 2008 03:50 PM Permalink
pl dont report this message as an abuse! there is one in kabah also!! lets see what this mughal/turk raped hindu convert community has to say about that.
RE:Sikular India
by anj30 on Mar 07, 2008 04:17 PM Permalink
ksr, your mind is caught between a traumatic past and dangerous present, you should get your facts and mind straigthened. As blabbering would not change history
RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by manish on Mar 07, 2008 03:49 PM Permalink
90% of indian muslims today are converted forcibly by Muslim ruler and eso called emperor.
unfortunately these muslims forgetting that their ancestors are killed , their mother, wives and sisters are raped by these rulers and their men later converted to islam and gave birth to millions of todays muslim population in india.
It is fact and hiiden thick in indian history ....
RE:RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by vspi on Mar 07, 2008 03:56 PM Permalink
What do you mean 90% its 100%, there were only 1400 who came with babar abt 1000 years ago, all of them raped & converted to a humongus 18% today in India & 100% in pakistan & bangladesh.
RE:RE:RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by jagar singh on Mar 07, 2008 04:21 PM Permalink
hindus converted before babur came here.myth is not a substitute for history,mr vspi
RE:RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by vijay pherwani on Mar 07, 2008 03:41 PM Permalink
GUAGE FOR YOURSELVES HOW SECULAR IS INDIAN MEDIA- REDIFF MODS WUD DELETE ANYTHING THAT IS PRO-HINDUS, THATS SECULARISM FOR YOU IN OUR HINDU-MAJORITY INDIA
RE:RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by vspi on Mar 07, 2008 03:42 PM Permalink
We've a road (Aurangzeb Road) named in the most prestigous locality of our capital Delhi after the most cruel and hated muslim ruler, we've movies glorifying Akbar as a secular ruler (after he beheaded 35,000 Hindu children, women & men after conquering Delhi)Akbar had more than 300 wives, he's know to be the pioneer of Red light area (Meena bazaar- every friday wud see his henchmen roam the streets of Delhi & Agra forcibly picking up girls and sending them to his harems), but we musn't say a word lest we sound "communal". How come Bollywood doesn't think of making a movie of Chattrapati Shivaji- The khan-daan actors cud all suit the role (SRK, the perfectionist Amir, the nawab Saif and the nangu-Sallu) but by doing that 1st they wud invite fatwas from the mullahs and secondly the 'bhai' wud not allow such a movie and lastly our "secular" media (Khalid mohammad, afsana ahmed, rubina khan, sheela butt) wud tear any attempt to make such a movie. Rediff mods pls do not delete this in the name of secularism.
RE:RE:RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by Anand YNI on Mar 07, 2008 04:02 PM Permalink
The best thing to do when you post your comments (if they are short) is - copy/pasting the original comment and saying that so and so posted such a comment and the following text is your answer.
RE:RE:RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by vspi on Mar 07, 2008 03:45 PM Permalink
Rediff mods deleted the post, which I've re-posted above. (abt road being named after aurangzeb in Delhi...etc.)
RE:IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM
by shahbaz farooqui on Mar 07, 2008 03:54 PM Permalink
HAHA WHAT A JOKE MODI A PRIME MINISTER.AND DONT LET US SHOW OUR ANGER.
RE:its a joke to call aurangzeb an emperor, he even didnt protect his son from emperor Shivaji's custody, the truth is aurangzeb was a terrorist
by Anand YNI on Mar 07, 2008 03:53 PM Permalink
"On" wrotr thr following message.
"Aurangzeb was a emperor lets accept it. But it was Shivaji who alone challenged him. "Kaashi ki kala jaati, Mathura mein masjid vasti. Agar Shivaji na hote, toh sunnat sabki hoti"
Manishankar Aiyer, Sonia, Mulayam, Karunanidhi, Laalu, Yechuri, Karat are all present day Aurangzebs. Lets unite to bury them
RE:its a joke to call aurangzeb an emperor, he even didnt protect his son from emperor Shivaji's custody, the truth is aurangzeb was a terrorist
by jagar singh on Mar 07, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
read jadunath sarkar on Aurangzeb.may your eyes open to history
Why doesnt Karunanidhi open his big mouth now? Karunanidhi was very vocal in supporting the Sethu project. He should now support the exibition if he is really secular. He should say bad things about Aurangzeb now, But he wont because he has no guts. Because the Hindus are not united. Because most of the Hindus are cowards.
RE:Karunanidhi should act now & continue the exibition
by Badrinarayanan D on Mar 07, 2008 03:49 PM Permalink
Karunanidhi won't do this because he is not secular. His only job is to talk shit on hindus. He won't talk on other religion and to get appreciations from other religion heads. if he is truely secular, then he won't be attending the roza on id days or christmas festivals during christmas time.
RE:Karunanidhi should act now & continue the exibition
by Anand YNI on Mar 07, 2008 03:55 PM Permalink
Agar muh kholne se usko kuch fayada nahin hota to woh muh nahin kholega.
