RE:All Muslims in India dont belong to India....
by Fried Yakov on Mar 08, 2008 12:53 AM Permalink
Who is this prince??????// What is his pincipality? If he thinks that Aurangzeb did great by supposedly handing over a few yard of land from the millions of acres that his forefathers had so brutally snatched from the sons of the soil, the Hindus, to build a temple, then he was not doing charity- he was disposing off unwanted baggage. If the Jews who were in Palestine and Jerusalem much before Islam was even conceived in the minds of Muhammed ask the Arabs to move out from Gaza, the whole world raises a hue and cry, not noting that it is the Jews who are the sons of the soil of Israel. If the Muslims think that Aurangzebs disposal of useless land and a few pennies to the people from whom his forefathers had stolen it is charity, then they must be willing to admit that the Jews have shown exemplary charity, compassion and magnanimity by allowing the Arabs to live in Gaza, even though it is a fact that the Muslims had cruelly and hideously displaced the Jews from their land in the past.
RE:All Muslims in India dont belong to India....
by S Sreejith on Mar 08, 2008 02:09 AM Permalink
I wonder how you have brain washed. If you know the history you will never try to write this. Who were the Israelies they were the descendants of Prophet Abraham and who was he? he was a muslim, his son Jacob was also a muslim. And all his descendants were muslim like Moses and Aaron. But Jews never follow these prophets and they made their own changes in testaments. And muslims never done cruelty on anybody until they initiated or done something wrong or did harm to muslims. There were only Jews who deceived and break their promises so they only brought the consequences and have been thrown out from their lands. If you have time to read some scriptures then read it and you will find some verses stating Jews are deceivers, violence makers and it is the most hated and unliked community on the face of earth. Just read the correct history bro, u will find the truth.
RE:RE:RE:All Muslims in India dont belong to India....
by rationalist on Mar 08, 2008 10:38 AM Permalink
Sreejith, Suggest to use your Muslim name itself.. It is really evident..Y to hide it..Don't feel ashamed..It is not good.
let the muslims know that with jehangir to auranzeb had hindu blood in them, even all muslims in india are hindu blooded, let them take their DNA, wether there is pagan blood in them , then why shy
RE:moghuls and muslims
by Julius on Mar 08, 2008 03:23 AM Permalink
I'm just attaching Fried Yakov's reply which is so logical and been hidden by Muslim fanatics.
RE:moghuls and muslims by Fried Yakov on Mar 07, 2008 11:57 PM | Hide message Who is this prince??????// What is his pincipality? If he thinks that Aurangzeb did great by supposedly handing over a few yard of land from the millions of acres that his forefathers had so brutally snatched from the sons of the soil, the Hindus, to build a temple, then he was not doing charity- he was disposing off unwanted baggage. If the Jews who were in Palestine and Jerusalem much before Islam was even conceived in the minds of Muhammed ask the Arabs to move out from Gaza, the whole world raises a hue and cry, not noting that it is the Jews who are the sons of the soil of Israel. If the Muslims think that Aurangzebs disposal of useless land and a few pennies to the people from whom his forefathers had stolen it is charity, then they must be willing to admit that the Jews have shown exemplary charity, compassion and magnanimity by allowing the Arabs to live in Gaza, even though it is a fact that the Muslims had cruelly and hideously displaced the Jews from their land in the past.
RE:moghuls and muslims
by S Sreejith on Mar 08, 2008 02:13 AM Permalink
Yeah you are rite. If you say that all muslims in India are hindu blooded then I would like to bring in your notice that all hindus in India now have muslim blood in them. If you were there before 4000 years then you can see them, they were all muslims read vedas and you will find it.
RE:moghuls and muslims
by Subash Shukla on Mar 08, 2008 02:58 AM Permalink
Are you really S. Sreejith or some Paki or Muzzi hiding behind this name. Before 4000 years neither Islam nor Christianity existed so how can there be Muslims before 4000 years. If you have some sound logic please present that do not just go on like an escapee from a lunatic asylum.
RE:moghuls and muslims
by Julius on Mar 08, 2008 03:21 AM Permalink
This is the problem with Muslims. That pedo Mohammed has brainwashed them with these lunatic ideas saying Islam was there 4000 years ago. Lot of Muslims lunatics said that to me!
Karunanidhi - you claim to fight for tamils- why are you protecting this Nawab whose descendent are not even Indian. Why is this foreigner still called a prince in TN?
There are four known facts: 1. Aurangzeb did demolish some temples and did use it as raw materials for building some mosques. 2. Congress, Left and DMK are pro-muslim and anti-hindu parties for their greed of staying in power. 3. Muslim league wants to brush this truth under the carpet to feed power to the Babri Masjid issue. 4. Hindus are so ignorant that they time and again vote these anti-hindu political parties to power.
There are four things we can do to correct this issue: 1. Don't vote for these anti-hindu political parties. 2. Give a strict warning to BJP to be non-communal. Splitting the country on basis of religion, faith, caste, region etc is not good for our country 3. Muslim organization must not try to stop things that is part of the history and is truth. Nobody can do anything to change the history. People must know from incidents like these and Babri Masjid that destroying somebody's religious place will only do bad for our country. 4. Hindus needs to understand that they are the majority in this country and they cannot be treated cheaply by any political parties. Also Hindu's needs to understand their responsibility towards the minorities and must try to protect and respect other minority faiths and religions. And must try to prevent any future events like Babri Masjid and temple demolitions.
This would be the formula for a united and glorious India
RE:Well well well.............
by susi soni on Mar 07, 2008 11:11 PM Permalink
let them know aurangzeb likked all his brothers imprisioned his dad, got killed the shahi imam, and liquidated all the shite rulers of the deccan, subjugated many hindus, made many wemen jodha, killed many sikhs, yet we still have a road inname in delhi.He converted many hindu and the terms were one maund of hinudu sacred thread daily of converted hindus, who now have become sore to their own blood, a seed having veil branches and poisonous fruits. Let the history be known, it is said he couldnt be buried because of his sins, and utlimately they had to take him to s desolate place in Khuldabad, even is commanders declared indemeoence from the moghuls now named as nizams, a history of brutality/treachery, not only on humans but on his own family members, auranzeb a charecter which will never have any respect evenamong muslims.
Aurangzeb was a pagal mullah who got crazy after he bit his dog.. The dog instantly became normal while Aurangzeb start biting people of other religions..as well as his father.
The problem of Islam is, it is stagnent and rigid. Not allowed any modification/adjustment according to new time. Barring couple of them, all of the Muslim rulers are curial and tryed to convert to islam. Aurgenzeb is typical and most curuial.
I never seen a Hindu king imposed tax on non hindus. That is the difference between Hindu and Islam. Idon't belive Islam is religon of peace, action speak louder than words. This only politically correct statment but not real.
I appriciate the effort of this Franchman, We should understand out past to what happens if muslims come to power, you need to pay tax just being hindu. wakeup know our history...
Look at this piece of garbage "Prince of Arcot" ! In this day and age, in the democratic republic of India, there should be no kings and princes. Yet, this treacherous Muslim scoundrel has been given a huge palace right in Chennai city by our foolish government. He gets huge annual funds from the government. Did the government not ban the system of giving Privy Purses to these guys ? This Prince of Arcot is descended from Turks, who were hired by the Mughals to fight Shivaji's armies in the southern parts of India. Later, during British times, the ancestors of today's Prince of Arcot agreed to kiss British ass, in return for which, the British granted them the title of Prince of Arcot. So, essentially, this family betrayed India, and kissed the ass of the British invaders, and got rewarded for it. Now, instead of summarily seizing his palace and ending his annual grants, the Government of India is busy pampering this backstabbing piece of sh*t. This Prince of Arcot is today supporting Aurangzeb, who was about 18 times worse than Hitler. Aurangzeb's crimes against Hindus are too enormous to even be comprehended by any human being. And here is Rediff, mouthing the comments of this worthless Muslim garbage "Prince of Arcot".
And of course the DMK wallahs have to shut down the exhibition in the name of "communal harmony". They are a bunch of un-intellectual, anti-Hindu thugs. Is there no freedom of expression in India? Or is it only for MF Hussain and his ude paintings?
