Sir, You should understand the following facts: -you are a caretaker PM -you never chosen by the people -you never going to win an election your own -you are not a politician -you are not a leader Also it is crystal clear that: - you not going to get a seat in the coming election -you never going to project as next PM -you never going to support by congress party -you never going to supported by communist or other regional parties -congress never going to win projecting you as PM
So let me as you: What you going to loose or win in 6 months.
NOTHING:
So why can't you reserve in history as the brave PM by forcefully signing the treat.
Let the govt fall. But you won't loose.
So you this is your best chance to place you in history. The future generation will remember you if this deal is going to be win-win situation for India.
RE:Listen Man Mohanji
by All Right on Jul 01, 2008 10:27 AM Permalink
Not a caretaker PM. India will sign the deal. 5 years with an av of 9% growth, 4% growth in agriculture growth is a stupendous achievement - unmatched by any PM todate.
The Left as we all know for their China-oriented mindset is now suddenly crying hoarse that the nuclear deal is not good for India. It is quite surprising to know that this two-state party can think of what is good for the country. Their blind opposition to anything that is American speaks volumes as to this parties stupidity and lack of foresight. The oil prices are rising by the day and they do not have the guts or courage to tackle the issue despite OPEC making empty noises on increasing oil supply or managing the prices to more saner levels. Instead of seeing reason, they are trying to scuttle this deal to the detrimental of the country. I hope that the Congress has enough spine to go through this deal. The Indian polity including the BJP must join together at least on this issue of national interest and teach the Left parties a fitting lesson they never forget.
Dr Harsh, First of all four years back, Certainly India didn't not welcome Congress against all odds. It was sheer arithmetic of a democracy and manipulation of both congress and the ever so irresponsible parties of the left that came into power. And also Sonia didn't willingly leave the seat to MMS, it was again the circumstances that made her make way for him. And all this hype of renoucing of the prime ministrial post was another greatest gimmick of this century.. how can someone forget all the fracas that was going on live in the loksabha that four years back.
and here again the author is trying to make himself politically correct by quoting "Indian Muslims are far too intelligent for this kind of scaremongering to work"... infact they are the only people who flock to the election booth enmasse and cast their vote to a particular party who satisfy them for the given day.. do u ever think they cast their vote on national interest.. they are only people who never use their intelligence while casting their votes.. not for no reason they are the block vote banks that all political parties try to cache.. u never sense intelligence here.. it is cult following! and then finally u find another secular columnist taking potshots at Narendra Modi when the context of his column is something else.. grow up people!
Left does not care about Lok sabha elections. Ruling Bengal is a higher priority for them. At this point Mamata Banerjee has formed unofficial alliance with the Congress to hurt Left Front in the panchayat elections. But if BJP comes to power at the centre, Mamata will lean more towards BJP because she wants to impose article 356 in Bengal under any pretext. This will alienate Congress and the anti-left vote will be split. In other words, arithmetically Left wants to face a Mamata BJP combo than a Mamata Congress combo.
Dr. Manmohan Singh Saved India after started Economic Reforms in 1991 when we Sold out our country gold reserve. We should not forget that those dayes of 1970s and 1980s situation. When We sold our country gold reserve to maintain the minimum balance required for our imports. Inflation was high that time also high. Land lines were few and mobile phones were a luxury. The people had to wait for years for a telephone connections after booking. We had to wait in long queues for the railway reservation. Waiting list of 5 years for getting the allotment for car or scooter. In 1988 India had changed 4 Prime Ministers PM in one year, Mr A.B Vajpayee,Chandra Shekhar,V.P.Singh and H. D. Deve Gowda.
RE:Dr. Manmohan Singh should complete 2nd Term
by j j on Jul 01, 2008 08:28 AM Permalink
Man Mohanji's completion of term - credit should go to opposition not CPM
RE:We managed Inflation at 22%, without us it could have been at 42% !!!
by j j on Jul 01, 2008 08:30 AM Permalink
Lost in the wild and very poor with numbers...ha ha ha
RE:We managed Inflation at 22%, without us it could have been at 42% !!!
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 01, 2008 08:34 AM Permalink
- I interacted with top BJP leaders as a media consultant for some time and I know exactly how they think.
RE:We managed Inflation at 22%, without us it could have been at 42% !!!
by All Right on Jul 02, 2008 12:50 PM Permalink
Good.... pity you didn't get a chance to interact with the GREAT Rahul Baba and Mandali
Good article till the very end when the author drags Mr. Narendra Modi and compares him with the fear mongers. I have listened to a few of Modi's speeches and all I have heard is good governance and prosperity for the people. It is precisely the likes of this author that confuse tall leaders like Modi and continue to search for tall leaders! Can the author quote any fear mongering speech from Modi?
harsh did you forget the bashing Amitabh gave you , when you wrote a stupid artile on him.
In your last 4 paragraphs you say India is bereft of Leaders. Actually it is not.
u want to sit in london and comment on India.Better come here and involve in some positive process. really....thats beyond ur capability and capacity..
even he borned in lahore before independece, he has bowed his head in front jinnah, better than two tongue leader.if he was not there as finance minister in 1991,majority was them on bankrupty.
RE:BETTER THAN
by j j on Jul 01, 2008 08:32 AM Permalink
patel, very poor in History. Look on a map where you born that was drawn before 1947 and comment
