Muhammad died of a fever at the age of 63, with his violent religion now firmly rooted in the Arab lands. Through his teachings, his followers viewed worldly life as a constant physical battle between the House of Peace (Dar al-Salaam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb).
Over the next fourteen centuries, the bloody legacy of this extraordinary individual would be a constant challenge to those living on the borders of the religion’s hegemony. The violence that Muslim armies would visit on people across North Africa, the Middle East, Europe and into Asia as far as the Indian subcontinent is a tribute to a founder who condoned subjugation, rape, murder and forced conversion in the cause of the spread of his religion.
In Muhammad's words: "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them..." (Bukhari 8:387)
It is certainly the basis not just for modern day terror campaigns against Western infidels (and Hindus and Buddhists) but also the broad apathy that Muslims across the world have to the violence, which is an obvious enabler.
As Indonesian cleric, Abu Bakar Bashir recently put it, "If the West wants to have peace, then they have to accept Islamic rule."
RE:The saga of Intolerance
by rediffblogger on Jun 28, 2008 11:49 PM Permalink
hey forget all this. the day is not far when common man from majority community will start taking law into his hands and teach this dadiwallas a lesson they will remember for eternity.
RE:The saga of Intolerance
by rediffblogger on Jun 28, 2008 11:54 PM Permalink
hahaha. what a joke. the whole world knows which community is mad and crazy. the most backward religion of all has no right to point a finger at others understood u fool. wait for 09. BJP will come to power and I pray that there r riots throughout India wherein every self respecting Indian participates and drive out the useless stinking dadiwallas like you.
RE:The saga of Intolerance
by ByTheWay on Jun 28, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
Do you have anything else to scribe other than the paragraph you are keep on pasting here...nuisance. Debate on the subject with fatcs and figures other than keep on crying and burning inside with the thought of BJP govt at center by Apr 09.
RE:The saga of Intolerance
by JGN on Jun 29, 2008 12:10 AM Permalink
True, but at another place it says "go and kill all the non-believers". The Quran is a book that contains contradictory verses and the mullahs brainwash the impressionable youths quoting some hate-filled verses.
whatever is happining in kashmir is pure Kashmiri nationalism" and it shouldn't be equated with fundamentalism. kashmiries aren't against the Amarnath Yatra - they are only protesting against the land transfer which is pure nationalism not a single yatri has been hurt in kashmir from last one week .Had this type of protests been done by hindu terrist organisations like VHP Bharang Dhal in places like Gujrat etc hundreds of muslims would have been killed. Kashmiries have been denied right of self determination since 1947 which india promised them in UN and is crushinp the public uprising since 1989 in which thousands of innocent kashmiries have been killed by indian (7 lakh )troops and 10000 kashmiries are still missing in custody. and worst form of human rights violations have been done in kashmir for which partially indian media is also responsible which has not brought a tru picture of kashmir
RE:Truth is this
by Rahul Singh on Jun 28, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
Karhmiri Nationalism is a misnomer. Before 1980 Kashmir was regarded as "Jannat of Earth". Everybody in Kashmir was happy. But once the Muslim fundamentalism taken over the majority of the unemployed musmlim youth, the trouble began. I consider this is purely vested politics. People of Kashmir should wake up from their sleep and look forward to build a strong india where Kashmir is regarded as a Head of India. Look the Pakistan and Bangladesh before going for new country.
RE:Truth is this
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 11:35 PM Permalink
This is the saga of intolerance: Muhammad died of a fever at the age of 63, with his violent religion now firmly rooted in the Arab lands. Through his teachings, his followers viewed worldly life as a constant physical battle between the House of Peace (Dar al-Salaam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb).
Over the next fourteen centuries, the bloody legacy of this extraordinary individual would be a constant challenge to those living on the borders of the religion’s hegemony. The violence that Muslim armies would visit on people across North Africa, the Middle East, Europe and into Asia as far as the Indian subcontinent is a tribute to a founder who condoned subjugation, rape, murder and forced conversion in the cause of the spread of his religion.
In Muhammad's words: "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them..." (Bukhari 8:387)
It is certainly the basis not just for modern day terror campaigns against Western infidels (and Hindus and Buddhists) but also the broad apathy that Muslims across the world have to the violence, which is an obvious enabler.
As Indonesian cleric, Abu Bakar Bashir recently put it, "If the West wants to have peace, then they have to accept Islamic rule."
RE:Truth is this
by irfan khan on Jun 28, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
You Idiot, who told you VHP & BHajrang Dal are terrorist orgs. Don't even dream of talking like this when you come talk about our unity with Hindus here in India. We are much safer here in India than being there in your country. Everyday people are being killed, no economy to survive, no future growth plans, no proper infrastructure. Don't talk hell of us like this. Mind your own business, we are much prosperous here. Kashmiris will prosper being part of India than suffer at your hands and mullahs.
RE:Truth is this
by QandA on Jun 28, 2008 11:46 PM Permalink
A Benezir was killed in broad day light. While a Roman Catholic lady called as Sonia Maino rules India..
If VHP/Bajrang Dal were terrorist we know what would have happened to Sonia
RE:Truth is this
by Terminator on Jun 28, 2008 11:33 PM Permalink
We Indians fooled and have been fooling the stupid kashimiris since 1947 on self determination.
..mullahs are happy to romp in saudi arabia on taxpayer's hard earned money, while they won't even allow land in India for Amarnath pilgrims. these 2 faced hypocrites must be kicked out of the country, along with their lickers, the congress.
RE:mullahs..
by ByTheWay on Jun 28, 2008 11:36 PM Permalink
You fool, even if I take your 'misinformation' or 'false agenda' in face value then also govt is booking tickets in advance and giving 'discount' to Haj trip..right ? Have you heard of anything like that for the majority population? And govt will use the tax paid the nation for this ? I know you are not an Indian and you are here just to spread hatred which you terrorists have been trying for decades..you may win the battles , but no the war you fool.
RE:mullahs..
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 11:37 PM Permalink
amitabh badchalan, arrange chartered flights of Saudi Airlines for the next Haj and see how much discount you can get. Don't travel by Air-India and also don't take any Haj subsidy if you think that the same is not for real.
RE:Is it OK for Politicians to negotiate with Human Killers aka Terrorists?
by QandA on Jun 28, 2008 11:35 PM Permalink
Does that allow U to take a life of another innocent person who is not related to this incident at all?
RE:Is it OK for Politicians to negotiate with Human Killers aka Terrorists?
by holirang on Jun 28, 2008 11:32 PM Permalink
poliician r biggest terrorist like mo, bu, etc
RE:RE:Is it OK for Politicians to negotiate with Human Killers aka Terrorists?
by QandA on Jun 28, 2008 11:40 PM Permalink
So prove that in the court of law and punish them.. This is true in most of the countries except the Islamis world where a Taslima is chased on streets instead of debated with ideas in the court of law..
The Blacks won the injusice done by Whites in the court of law using white lawyers.. It was impossible for them to use violence to acheive their goal..
The Pakis think that they got a Bangladesh and a Pakistan using violence against poor non-violent Hindus.. That history now... If violence is used as a tool of negotiation then please tell the Kashmiri terrorist to marry more wives 'Cos more blood shed will happen... 'Cos now we r ready...
My job is to eddicate people to get rid of Gandhigir and I think it is history now...
RE:Congress busy appeasing Hindus
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 11:25 PM Permalink
Good, there should be somebody to appease the hindus also. If all of them appease only muslims where would the poor hindus go? Will the Saudis accept all hindus in India??????
RE:RE:NRPs
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 11:28 PM Permalink
What is the difference between Khakhi Chaddi and Skull Cap? Two sides of same coin. So long as Skull Caps exists, Khakhi Chaddi also will exist.
RE:NRPs
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 11:27 PM Permalink
Though the Indian muslims live in and benefit from the Indian soil, their loyalty is to the sands of Arabia (and by extension to Pak also)!
RE:NRPs
by Terminator on Jun 28, 2008 11:29 PM Permalink
Like Hindus in Sri Lanka who favour India or independent Ealam over their Sri Lankan motherland.
RE:RE:NRPs
by lets go on Jun 28, 2008 11:30 PM Permalink
and those guys are branded as terrorists in India, but you guys consider osama as your saviour
RE:Cong is about to loose another state
by holirang on Jun 28, 2008 11:26 PM Permalink
Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; 2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; 3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; 4. And there is none like unto Him.
RE:Cong is about to loose another state
by QandA on Jun 28, 2008 11:23 PM Permalink
Question is not about Advani or Modi. A Daud can easy kill them on a Friday afternoon... WHat needs to be done it Institution have to be build which lasts beyond Modi or Advani.. The task of these institution should be to hunt and kill terrorists the moment they are born...
DO you guys agree? Buy the way Subhash Ghai has a Muslim wife so I can underdstand his points of view? But can a Terrorist really transfor?
Lets say Mussharaf was ACTIVELY FUNDING terrorist act? Was it morally correct for Indians to even talk to him? He was not even democractically elected like the terrorist Hezbollah is eleced in Palistine?
So what do we say to all the politicians who sit next to table and negotiate with Terrorist?
RE:A moron know as Subhash Ghai potrays that a Terrorists can be reformed with love..
by QandA on Jun 28, 2008 11:29 PM Permalink
Do U think I care about his wife?? His centrists attitude is what needs to be corrected which is what I am debating... He is a moron when he potrays films about terrorist who explode bombs which kill innocent people and stop lives of other people...
RE:A moron know as Subhash Ghai potrays that a Terrorists can be reformed with love..
by jack back on Jun 28, 2008 11:22 PM Permalink
hey don't say a word about RSS.Because of them you can call yourself by hindu name. Are you so intimidated that you can not see the truth?
And by the way when misinformation is corrected it becomes a true information for sane mind.But those who are tangled within misinformation, they will call a true information a misinformation.Learn to check facts.I know it is hard to follow RedCon & see the truth.Like they say 'eat a cake & have it too'
