After all these people realised that they are not democrate Indians and they are touts of Pakistan and so they don't have right to sit in the legislation. Good. Der aye doorost aye. Now let God gives them more wisdom and they leave India as well. They are black spot of Indian constitution as well as Islam. They are nothing but just terrorist. That bloody Bin Laden would have died a miserable death, but they want to fight. Someone please teach them the way to live like humans or I think we sould send them to Mars and explore a battle field.
RE:Good Job done - these people don't deserve to sit in Parliament
by holirang on Jun 29, 2008 12:07 AM Permalink
1. Woe to every (kind of) scandal-monger and-backbiter, 2. Who pileth up wealth and layeth it by, 3. Thinking that his wealth would make him last for ever! 4. By no means! He will be sure to be thrown into That which Breaks to Pieces, 5. And what will explain to thee That which Breaks to Pieces? 6. (It is) the Fire of (the Wrath of) Allah kindled (to a blaze), 7. The which doth mount (Right) to the Hearts: 8. It shall be made into a vault over them, 9. In columns outstretched.
Can a similar reciprocity be seen in Muslims? No, Can a Hindu be a head of a Muslim Mosque?
It another matter that he will not 'Cos of the Violent nature of Islam... We know what happens during Muhharm.. All the boby bashing and blood splitting... How can a sane Hindu mind represent it.. But a Muslim mind like A P J Abdul Kalam can easily relate to Bhagwadta Gita which does not promote any violence against its non-believers...
RE:Abdul Rehman Antulay was the Treasurer of Mahalakshmi Temple in Bombay?
by QandA on Jun 29, 2008 12:10 AM Permalink
Black don't pretend to be whites in US or UK? When is your SRK going to represent just his divine Allah? We all know whats's going to happen to his fan base once he starts representing a True Muslim...
RE:Abdul Rehman Antulay was the Treasurer of Mahalakshmi Temple in Bombay?
by JGN on Jun 29, 2008 12:32 AM Permalink
He also drinks a lot and also smokes continuously. Does it make him a pious muslim? Would Allah be merciful enough to reward him with "wine, women, water, fruits, etc" in the Paradise?
RE:Abdul Rehman Antulay was the Treasurer of Mahalakshmi Temple in Bombay?
by Gopaal Dhussa on Jun 29, 2008 12:03 AM Permalink
Please don't talk loose about a pious religion like Islam just because of these Idiots who are actually not Muslims but just greedy dogs. And dogs do not have any religion.
RE:Abdul Rehman Antulay was the Treasurer of Mahalakshmi Temple in Bombay?
by QandA on Jun 29, 2008 12:20 AM Permalink
This the Justification of IDOL worshipp...
Muslims unknowingly try to make fun of Hindu IDOL worship. But they don't understand that Hindus found that the visible world (Atoms/molecules of the objects in nature that are being watched by Human eyes which themselves are Atoms and molecules) is representation of GOD. Some Ghostly vibrations forms electrons and protons which in turn forms Atoms and molecules which in turn forms the visible world. GOOD AND BAD things are both realtization of the same GOD including Humans. Hence nothing wrong in worshipping IDOLs which have Human forms.
The reality perceived by the Human is representation of the whole universe..
The Human Brain including its eays are electrons and protons. The Visioble world which reflects light on to a Human eye is made up of Electrons and Protons. So the question needs to be asked is who is expereicing the experience..
When I eat sugar the sweetnees of is felt by the soul which is part and parcel of GOD. Hence Hindus use Namaste to respect the Soul inside your body...
There is nothing wrong in worshipping IDOLS/Stones/Humans or anything visible in the Universe. "Cos they are all made up of Atoms and Electrons and Enery(Soul) which morphes as GOD...
If you want to know what the 21'st century Hindu minds are thinking about GOD then here is a starter..
RE:Abdul Rehman Antulay was the Treasurer of Mahalakshmi Temple in Bombay?
by ByTheWay on Jun 29, 2008 12:10 AM Permalink
Hey QandA, leave this 'sick creature'..he dont know the reality or may be do not want to know. he is here just spread hatred...a simi activist. leave him
RE:Negationism
by karuna nidhi on Jun 29, 2008 02:15 AM Permalink
Wait till your mother, wives, daughters, sisters will be sold by you for your living after terrorism is driven out of the world
RE:Negationism
by Rationalist on Jun 29, 2008 12:27 AM Permalink
Its not misinformation.Your ignorance. Try to come out of Madarass and get some first hand knowledge about the world. They say "ignaorance is bliss". But your bliss is not absolute. Learn to accept reality.
RE:Negationism
by QandA on Jun 29, 2008 12:33 AM Permalink
Give me your Email ID and I will send details to you.. At the moment here are some links
This is a link from a US school teacher. Since US does not allow religion based teaching in public school so this teacher is teaching her students using Google..
After Independence from British, the Muslims violently demanded a separate state and insisted it to be based on a single religion. They wrote a Constitution which was/is a joke to minorities in Na-pak Pakistan..
Then they attacked Kashmir based again on majority/minority religious sentiment. The legal joining of the Kashmir territory is no longer a dispute..
What the fanatic LUNGIS ARE CHALLENGIN is that a Hindu Maharaja cannot represent the Kashmiri Muslims and hence that viods the legaltiy which made Kashmir the part of India...
Now Abdul Rehman Antulay can become a Chief Minister of Maharashtra but a Hindu Maharaja cannot represent Kashmiri Maslims.. Why is that?
Why is Islam above others?
Why can the signed treaty be considered as the will of the people?
Why do U need a Plebisite?
Was Pakistan made using a Plebisite?
Was Bangladesh made using a Plebisite?
If Muslims CM can represent Hindus in India why can't the Muslims recipocrate that...
But we all know Islam is superior to anybody... Lets ask these questions to SRK or Shabana or Javed Akhtar?
RE:RE:Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 2:217
by Rationalist on Jun 29, 2008 12:08 AM Permalink
A**le,Stop justifying terrorism bringing irreleavent issues.First look at yourself in the mirror and then talk about others you supporters of killing and converting.
RE:Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 2:217
by karuna nidhi on Jun 29, 2008 02:17 AM Permalink
Not born to single father as usual. Challenge that you know your fahter's name and your own mother's name bcos u muslims B$$D have more than 1 relation. Many-to-Many
RE:Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 2:217
by manoj on Jun 29, 2008 03:07 AM Permalink
Do muslims have sex?I wonder even that duty is done by us, after all we are trained by those porno fairytales...i am searching for some muslim pu*s*s*y
RE:Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 2:217
by Rationalist on Jun 29, 2008 12:32 AM Permalink
You got what you deserved. Fools never learn.Looking for another justification.Then what about Godrah?Why was that instigated? Geeta says " It is not sin just to inflict atrocities, but to tolerate also". You got what you deserved or lesser. If the attocities of your founder or rather inventor is listed then it starts from 7th century.
RE:Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 2:217
by JGN on Jun 29, 2008 12:01 AM Permalink
Good. So you admit that Lord Rama and Lord Krishna are Avatars of Lord Vishnu. Now don't say "there is no god but allah and Muhammed is his last Prophet". There are other gods also (as admitted by you and also by the great Aalim Dr. Zakir Naik).
RE:Those who die in their disbelief will burn forever in the Fire. 2:217
by JGN on Jun 29, 2008 12:16 AM Permalink
If the books of hindus are fairy tales, the book of those who swear by one god and one book is a "terrorist manual". You can get category-wise verses like Absurdities, Contradictions, hatred, good-stuff etc from The Quran from "The Skpetics Annotated Bible" Pl read and understand for yourself. Anyway, there is no god, either of muslims or hindus or of any other religion. So don't fight in the name of non-existent gods.
RE:Disbelievers worship false gods. The will burn forever in the Fire. 2:257
by manoj on Jun 29, 2008 03:10 AM Permalink
yaar ek baat bataooo....tumhara prophet Mohammad sahi mein bahut haraami tha bey....uske jamaane mein dance bar nahin tha....bad luck....aaj hota to main usko mumbai ki raunak dikhata
RE:Disbelievers worship false gods. The will burn forever in the Fire. 2:257
by JGN on Jun 29, 2008 12:19 AM Permalink
Who married a six year old girl at the age of 53????
RE:Disbelievers worship false gods. The will burn forever in the Fire. 2:257
by karuna nidhi on Jun 29, 2008 02:18 AM Permalink
Ur father and Allah ha ha ha
8:65 O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence
4:74 Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.
RE:RE:The disbelievers are a folk without intelligence!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 11:51 PM Permalink
So you are aware of such things. Good. Beware.
RE:The disbelievers are a folk without intelligence!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by JGN on Jun 29, 2008 12:03 AM Permalink
No need of elaborating. Every one reading your posts are aware of that.
Chapman Cohen, in his "Theism or Atheism," clearly states: "We know that man does not discover God, he invents him, and an invention is properly discarded when a better instrument is forthcoming. To-day, the hypothesis of God stands in just the same relation to the better life of to-day as the fire drill of the savage does to the modern method of obtaining a light. The belief in God may continue awhile in virtue of the lack of intelligence of some, of the carelessness of others, and of the conservative character of the mass. But no amount of apologizing can make up for the absence of genuine knowledge, nor can the flow of the finest eloquence do aught but clothe in regal raiment the body of a corpse."
Religion arose as a means of explanation of natural phenomena at a time when no other explanation of the origin of natural phenomena had been ascertained. God is always what Spinoza called it, "the asylum of ignorance. “When causes are unknown, God is brought forward; when causes are known, God retires into the background. In an age of ignorance, God is active; in an age of science, he is impotent. History attests this fact.
