RE:N deal.
by Aonecoolguy on Jun 27, 2008 01:33 PM Permalink
And sell India's sovernigty to US. Think y hasn't US had a new nuclear reactor for the past 20 yrs. If we sign the deal they will sell all their old equipment and decommision their reactors.
The USA is the most powerful nation on the surface of the earth; the President of USA is often called the “King of the World” by some commentators in jest. It has cleverly devised many ways to enslave the nations of the world, it enslaves some nation through culture, some nations like Chine through trade, some nations through export of armaments, some nations through outright occupation like Iraq, some nations through threats and black mail like the nations of the Middle East and Pakistan, same nations like Britain it enslaved them through regular supply of American prostitutes.
But India is powerful nation. The people of India are smart, well educated and qualified, they are independent minded and peace loving people, it not find any a way to enslave this great nation.
Firt it shrewdly armed pigmy nations like Pakistan with military hardware, injected turmoil in Afghanistan, de-stablised the region and raised the threat perception, Indians were made to think and feel they had no friends in this world and are surrounded by enemies. Now it is pressurizing India to sign a nuclear deal so that it can enslave India too and bring it under it’s armpit.
The PM need not be in any dilema.He should take immediate decision,go ahead and sign the deal.He should not bother about the results of next elections.It may be incorrect to expect the same party will come to power in the next elections in the present scenario of coalation politics
RE:pm's dilema
by Aonecoolguy on Jun 27, 2008 01:32 PM Permalink
And sell India's sovernigty to US. Think y hasn't US had a new nuclear reactor for the past 20 yrs. If we sign the deal they will sell all their old equipment and decommision their reactors.
The root cause of many problems in India is its population.
India must reduce its population to at least 80% of its current value within the next ten years.
Encourage families to have only one child.
Penalize families that produce more than two children. Scrap their right to vote also.
Reservation benefits, subsidies, cheap loans and other such benefits must be provided ONLY TO THE FIRST CHILD of the family, irrespective of whether the first child is male or female, healthy or unhealthy, handicapped or not.
India must take drastic measures to control its population.
My servant maid is poor and has four children at the age of 30. Is this necessary? In Hyderabad at every junction, we can find beggars carrying children. Is it not cruel to produce children when they themselves have no food to eat?
RE:reduce population
by Reporter on Jun 25, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
Great planning. Reducing the population to 80 % of the current population in 10 years !!!!
China introduced one child policy is late 70s and still the population is increasing, even after 30 years and they expect to see negative growth after 2015.
So if India introduce one child policy this year, u can dream abt a negative growth after 2045 and by that time Indian population will be 1.5 billion.
And as u said reducing it by 80 %, sorry .... my calculator is not able to do claculations above 1 billion !!!!!
RE:reduce population
by Ram Sharma on Jun 25, 2008 07:33 PM Permalink
Reducuing population by 80 % in 10 yrs is not possible. However yr proposals r worth implementation.
We will develop capability to develop nuclear energy from thorium within next 25 years acc to our scientists. Thorium we have in vast quantities we dont have to kiss any ones ass for that.
So 25 years is not 25 centuries. Be patient. By then we will be Real Superpower. MMS, Congress or BJP dont make us slaves until then by signing FOOLISH agreements
TRADE IS TRADE AND SHOULD NOT BE TIED WITH POLITICS...
USA has historically entered into trade agreements with all sorts of governments eg communists, dictators, rogue states when it suits its needs. Preaching and practicing is NOT one of USAs strong character quality.
USA is itself fighting vehemently internally for 'clean coal',nuclear power and refineries. Its been at a standstill for 25-30 years--ALL talk.
India similarly has unlimited coal for power generation, solar, wind. For bio diesel we have jathropha plants with 40% oil content, Leaving corn and other plants in the dust. India can produce ALL its oil needs from this plant.
BUSH wants legacy before leaving office. Americas track record as a long term ally is poor, it can change its position at any time, if it does NOT meets its imperialist or foreign policy needs.
Hyde Act MUST be removed from the n-deal. If NOT India will be a colony of USA similar to British. Sonia will have no problem with that, she will be the Viceroy of India. Our tri colors will change to red-white-blue
USA has created Islamic Terror: 1) Jimmy Carter created Muzzahadins in Afghanistan 2) Reagan created Zia Ul Haque and Ben Laden 3) Clinton created Taliban 4) Clinton created Islamic state of Bosnia 5) Pakistan created 9/11 and got rewards from USA of $10 Billion so far plus all free weapons 6) George Bush created another Islamic state of Kosovo. 7) USA pushed up oil prices to make the Arab Skeikhs fantastically rich.
Thus, USA will not help India. Obama's father and step father are both Muslims. Those who are thinking just by surrendering India's nuclear weapons USA will be India's friend are the worse kind of stupid.
RE:MM Singh is trying to mislead the country.
by ashok on Jun 25, 2008 12:31 PM Permalink
Eisenhower and Truman made Saudi Arabia. ALL mosques and madrassas are supported by Saudi money. Bush paid money to Poristan to fight against its own troops in Afghanistan.
Actually American petro dollars are paying for the world over.
The oil American oil companies and families (Bush/Chenny types) have suppressed technological inventions and alternate fuels in USA for 50 years, even after the biggest eye opener in 1973 embargo.
Finally, USA and the world is at the end of the road. The oil producing countries have the world by the ballzs. It will be 10 to 20 years before this grip is relaxed.
Inflation is the main problem now, which is partly due to some American companies monopolistic control of the crude oil business. The other reason for inflation is fast growing demand in India and China.
Increasing Population & consumerism must b controlled for this. In 1800 the world population was 79 cr. Now only our population is about 110 cr and world population is 615 cr. Whereas the cultivable land has reduced due to other uses. This has caused Water and air pollution. Sub soil water table has gone down. Roads of all big and small towns r jammed with traffic. Forest land is getting depleted. Many plant and animals r getting extinct. Global warming is taking place.
The solution is forcefully enforcing one child norm on the lines of China, who started this policy in 1979. It is worth mentioning here that land area of China is many times that of ours. We hv 2.4% of land and 16% of population of the world.
Most of the religious leaders, foolishly ask people of their religion to have more children. It is catastrophic. They should know that God and Nature do not distinguish on the basis of religion.
Simple living should also b encouraged. Except fresh air and water, food, clothing and shelter all other requirements r psychological. We should cycle for travelling short distances and avoid fashion & beauty products to reduce energy consumption. Rich people all over the world, especially in USA waste lot of energy.
RE:Inflation is real problem - control population & consumerism for controlling this
by Money tvs on Jun 25, 2008 12:42 PM Permalink
Do you really grasp the effects of one child norm in China? in about 15 years 60% of the chinese population will be above the productive age, most of them living on hard earned pensions. Productivity goes down and number of mouths to feed remains almost the same. it will be a catastrophe. China realized this and they are looking at increasing their population. There are two sides to every coin. forcefully implementing one child norm might result in immediate results but it is not wise in the long run
RE:Inflation is real problem - control population & consumerism for controlling this
by Reporter on Jun 25, 2008 03:28 PM Permalink
OK. Agreed. Then dont opt for one child policy. People will fight and reduce the population India. Survival of the fittest. Those who are fit and productive will survive and we dont have to feed the unproductive people.
RE:Inflation is real problem - control population & consumerism for controlling this
by Ram Sharma on Jun 25, 2008 07:30 PM Permalink
No doubt there r two sides of a coin. But having more children is more disastrous than having one child. Unless we control population and consumerism, there will b fights for water, food, there will b more diseases from polluted water and air. More people will die of trafic accidents etc.
China is not thinking of increasing population, though it is following the one child norm since 30 yrs. Everyone likes to hv more children, but that wish has to remain unfulfilled for the good of the planet. Ocean level has increased by 530 mm during last 50 yrs due to global warming, though earlier estimate was that it will increase by 1.2 mm / yr. Cities like Mumbai etc will vanish, if it goes on.
RE:Inflation is real problem - control population & consumerism for controlling this
by mahabodhi on Jun 25, 2008 11:31 AM Permalink
I fully agree with sir !Your view is like a fresh air in this forum !All must read this and acknowldge it !
