Every informed Indian knows that the Nuclear Deal is important for country. However the communists have used their 60 MPs as bargaining chip against it. If the congress thinks that it is necessary to sign it now , then it should go ahead with it. Congress has done reasonably good in last 4 years. They should have faith in people and if necessary face elections.
It is not only the Prime Minister or Congress which is responsible for the future of country. Every Party every citizen is equally responsible. At worst congress will have to sit in opposition after election. But it is far better than succumbing to adamant Communists.
RE:Nuclear Deal
by drax on Jun 24, 2008 01:53 PM Permalink
Nuke deal is good provided the Hyde act is not implemented. Otherwise just for 3-5% of Power we will be mortgaging our sovereignity to an unreliable USA which only looks for its own self interest.
RE:Nuclear Deal
by Ramesh Reddy on Jun 24, 2008 02:01 PM Permalink
Undermining National Security for little than 5% of energy requirements.Why not spend the billions of dollars meant for the Nuke deal on research.Elec. can be generated from Thorium aswell.
RE:Nuclear Deal
by kush chatterjee on Jun 24, 2008 02:13 PM Permalink
If every informed indian knows that the Nuke Deal is important for the country, wonder why the major opposition BJP is against the deal. Are they too anti nationals like the commies??!!
RE:Nuclear Deal
by Aajka Lalu on Jun 24, 2008 03:40 PM Permalink
BJP STATRED THE DEAL.!!! NOW THEY ARE OPPOSING BY HIDING BEHIND HYDE ACT. THEY HAD AGREED FOR UNILATERAL MORATORIUM ON FURTHER NUKE TESTS.
THEY ARE THE MOST ANTI NATIONALS WHO SURRENDERED BEFORE FOUR TERRORISTS AT KANDHAHAR
RE:Nuclear Deal
by K.B.ANAND on Jun 24, 2008 05:57 PM Permalink
Mr.Aajka Lalu,
You seem to know more than PM himself. BJP had agreed for UM on nuke tests!! Funny Indeed !!
BJP never had agreed for this moratorium, FYI. Hyde act is the most imp aspect of the deal. Congies are interested in pushing this deal before tackling Inflation because, they get fat Kickbacks. It is the weakest PM and brainless Sonia who didn't do their homework properly in the beginning itself. If only they had shown political maturity , we would have inked the deal minus the Hyde act/123. It is high time this congie Looters are shown the door.
RE:Nuclear Deal
by K.B.ANAND on Jun 24, 2008 05:56 PM Permalink
Mr.Aajka Lalu,
You seem to know more than PM himself. BJP had agreed for UM on nuke tests!! Funny Indeed !!
BJP never had agreed for this moratorium, FYI. Hyde act is the most imp aspect of the deal. Congies are interested in pushing this deal before tackling Inflation because, they get fat Kickbacks. It is the weakest PM and brainless Sonia who didn't do their homework properly in the beginning itself. If only they had shown political maturity , we would have inked the deal minus the Hyde act/123. It is high time this congie Looters are shown the door.
RE:BJP has no another option than Congress, because BJP says it will sign Nuclear deal with the US.
by kiainth on Jun 24, 2008 01:57 PM Permalink
Sahadevan(Chinese Dog)- Wait !Don't bark. Sonia Madam will invite you people on Dinner and will serve you good foods. Everyone knows that MMS has not given dinner party for you people and hence from last 10 days you are barking.
RE:BJP has no another option than Congress, because BJP says it will sign Nuclear deal with the US.
by aarshabharata on Jun 24, 2008 01:54 PM Permalink
Commie ... why did you stop there. The tsunamic was caused by BJP, the earthquake in china was caused by BJP, the nandigram killings was caused by BJP, indian cricket team's loss to paskistan in the bangladesh was caused by BJP. You commies are parasites.
The Left parties to explain why they are opposing the nuke deal. To a common man it seams that once nuke deal is signed we will get atomic energy which will reduce the usgae of fuel(petrol/diesel) hence there will be decraese in prices of all commodities.
RE:LEFT PARTIES (Pl explain why nuke deal should not be signed)
by Kaushik Dev on Jun 24, 2008 01:58 PM Permalink
Its all explained. One who reads the whole store, the Hyde act etc. will know. Use Google and go through all the articles.
RE:LEFT PARTIES (Pl explain why nuke deal should not be signed)
by All Right on Jun 24, 2008 01:54 PM Permalink
I'm not saying Left is completely right in their reasoning, but it might help to read the other Rediff article: "Don't go ahead with N-deal: Top Scientists"..
RE:RE:LEFT PARTIES (Pl explain why nuke deal should not be signed)
by All Right on Jun 24, 2008 01:56 PM Permalink
:-) :-) Another bit of entertainment....
what's corporates to store food items upto 50000? When did BJP pass the bill? In 2001?.... boss wake up, it's 2008.... someone else is in power now.. some people called Communists are running the government along with some other jokers
RE:LEFT PARTIES (Pl explain why nuke deal should not be signed)
by Ramesh Reddy on Jun 24, 2008 02:03 PM Permalink
Please understand that the deal will supply lot less than 5% of the energy requirements.
RE:LEFT PARTIES (Pl explain why nuke deal should not be signed)
by sunil p on Jun 24, 2008 01:50 PM Permalink
Can't we really use Solar energy which is free of cost and is plenty too atleast in India.
Its unfortunate that vote banks, ability to come back to power, impact of decisions on vote banks are the driving forces for policy making in the country. What about a Nation's Interests. What about the Visions like 2020. Where is the roadmap of Where we want to be 10 , 20 , 30 years from now and how are we going to reach there. There should be a Common Agenda which every government should follow irrespective of whichever party it is. All we see is stop gap measures within a 5 year timeline.
I am not supporting or bashing the nuke deal. The real details regarding this are not made public so obviously as citizens we are not able to debate whether it is good or not. But it is heartening to read above that parties decision making process is dependent on other variables apart from national interest.
RE:National Interests !!!!
by bhimsen on Jun 24, 2008 02:00 PM Permalink
I think the day Congress chose Sonia as its leader that was the day when India became slave of USA / NATO / Italy. I don't know if China, Pak, Israel can get uranium without any such agreement then why can't we from Russia.
The full text of this Agreement is not available for public consumption which itself smacks of shadyism. MMS is free to throw tantrums but the fact is he will have to eat dust at the hands of Left.
UPA's agenda is now complete having divided the country for the benefit of some western power. False promises, minorityism, terrorism, spinless foreign policy and no guts these are the traits of this Govt. The legacy of this government will take a decades to be wiped out. Yet my friend there are enough citizens who want slavery rather than freedom. The worst thing is their tribe is growing.
If the dealer is OK why the scientists are opposing it. Is India going to become a slave to the USA once the deal is through ? Are the Americans slowly but steadily taking control of the neclwear regime by wrapping India first then Pakistan and the others? There are numerous loose ends in the deal for which CPM is opposing it.
RE:neuclear deal
by rajeev on Jun 24, 2008 01:49 PM Permalink
How do you know Dr kalam read the iaea agreement.The agreement is not even shown to left allies.It is quite possible Dr kalam was misled by showing parts of deal.
RE:neuclear deal
by Dinesh on Jun 24, 2008 01:56 PM Permalink
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO HARM IN SIGNING THE DEAL. IN LATER STAGES IF IT IS FOUND THAT THIS DEAL IS BIASED OF NOT USEFUL TO US, WE HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO WITHDRAW FROM THE DEAL.
Nuke deal with the USA is only for our leaders prestige not for our people. every single day in our country one farmer sucide or poisioned and our poket money day by day going down. nobody stop our inflation and today share market down and inflation going higher side. these finanacial execuitives are sleeping in parliment. who asking nuke deal. its bad time to prime minister. he's only seeing his personal sentiments to US. not for us.
RE:prime minister's dilemma
by jagar singh on Jun 24, 2008 01:48 PM Permalink
petroleum is reigning at 136/140 dollars a barrell.nuclear energy is one alternative.may be it reduces use of petroeum and reduce inflation.
The PM should look more into rising prices, why is he taking the Nuke deal as personal. If US cant wait let them do what ever they want to do with signing of the IEAE and NSG we can go ahead with the discussions with Russia and France. The last nuke reactor installed in US was in 1979 and most of the nuke rectors are been termed as unsafe for operations and will be dismantled, US wants to dump them in India at a premium cost. There is something really Fishy in this Whole Nuke deal.
RE:Why so much hype on Nuke Deal
by Sherly Dsouza on Jun 24, 2008 01:53 PM Permalink
dr is very little dat can be dn to bring the inflation down immediately...the indian politicians have allways lacked vision ...they never saw what tmorow holds..for the 1st time we have a PM looking in to the furure..n we have a complain with that also...he is trying to push forward what culd b achieved ...inflation will come down only after sept.we cant bring down the prices of commodities down...according to u US must be using Cow shit to generate electricity.
Please read the lines carefully "In states like Madhya Pradesh, where the Congress is pitted against the Bharatiya Janata Party, they would have no choice but to go with the Congress". These are the same words uttered in Gujrat but now you can see even Muslims voting for BJP there. It had happenned in Karnataka & will happen in other BJP States. How long Congress wants to insult Muslims like this? and live in dreams Paradise that Muslims will vote for it as they have no other options? The hung election results is only because Muslims are not voting enmass to any party. The smaller parties are getting few seats and becoming king makers. The only option left is that the national parties should understand who are the real king makers and work for there benefits. The so called Muslim appeasement by congress has been exposed and Muslims knows well that all said and done only on papers. The BJP should stop shouting Muslim appeasement stand by UPA and come out to do something good for Muslims. Then only we will have a single party rule. And for Dr. Singh's dilemma, he has no option but to continue or leave gracefully. Nuke deal will not change the inflation equation and one year is too less to bring back the life to normal. Mansoon havack is already seen in Assam, WB and Orissa. Should we still belive that good mansoon is good for govt. Even if it is not flooding where are the fertilizers? (Example Karnataka). So UPA you have lost, please go now. We want a good govt.
RE:Congress in dreams Paradise.
by jagar singh on Jun 24, 2008 01:53 PM Permalink
for the first time,the country has seen 9% growth for four years.employment growth is higher than population growth.the supply-demand mismatch will balance in time.we need greater devolution of prosperity and augment production in primary sector.core areas like food have not seen high inflation.it is basically manufaturing inflation.
RE:Congress in dreams Paradise.
by All Right on Jun 24, 2008 02:01 PM Permalink
:-)... yeah, pulses, rice, flour, vegetables etc. fall in manufacturing sector.... We should start eating Motorcycles, scooters, cars and drink petrol, when it's price will come down under the magnificent governance which has given us 9% growth.... by the way there was never any "India Shining" examples before Dr. Manmohan Singh took over, I guess.. ;-) The outsourcing boom and the associated growth probably happened in 1969, and not 1999, innit?.. :-)
