Dalai always says he has nothing to do with violence and has no control over mob. However, in an interview with Japan’s Yomiuri Shimbun on May 25th this year, he said that if Beijing accepts his proposal of Tibet, he promises no violence will be seen in the future. His words prove that he can make the affair be violent or not. His purpose is ask Chinese central government to talk with him and accept his requirements, otherwise, he will stir up troubles and even sacrifice innocent lives.
It’s unnecessary to cater to Dalai, who lacks credibility and humanity. China condemns everyone who breaks the law. What can he do then?
Dalai always claims that he is committed to non-violence. During an interview with German “Der Spiegel” on May 6th this year, he said that he is committed to non-violence during his life, and he will do so in the future. How dare does he say so? Doesn’t he think that the armed rebellion in Tibet in 1959 is violent? Doesn’t he think that the rebel organization named “four rivers and six ranges”, harassed people in Sino-Nepal border, is violent? Didn’t these affairs happen in his life? Or didn’t he lead these rebellions? He shouldn’t be a dotard because he gave speeches in several countries these years. If he’s not dull, it’s obviously that he doesn’t want to admit that the 1959 armed rebellion in Tibet and the harassing behaviors of “four rivers and six ranges” are violent. He even claimed the Lhasa 3.14 riot is a “peaceful protest”.
In an interview with AFP on May 23rd this year, Dalai said that if no agreement would be gotten with Chinese government, the protest would happen again, and would be violent. He thought more serious violence would occur as well. If Dalai doesn’t think 1959 armed rebellion in Tibet, the harassing behaviors of “four rivers and six ranges” and the Lhasa 3.14 riot are violent, then the “violence” mentioned by him must be much more severe.
