RE:PORNOGRAPHY IN RAMAYANA
by BustYourThoughts on Jun 12, 2008 12:28 PM Permalink
I really appreciate that you have got to the bottom of the truth. And in all those texts it may be detailed in such form. I appreciate the details of the practices held during those days. And I appreciate the openness of such facts if they are all true.
Mr. Samuel, I just cant believe, if at all you follow your religion, the so called Mother Mary was a virgin mother. Now do not bring deity-ism into this. She should have been really be satisfied all her sexual desires by some great personality, for otherwise the so call Jesus Christ wouldn't have born with such great qualities. Moreover you do not have any references on how it happened. The fact is unknown, or hidden in the deep oceans.
RE:RE:PORNOGRAPHY IN RAMAYANA
by JGN on Jun 12, 2008 12:42 PM Permalink
samuel, there much more atrocious things in The Bible. Pl visit the web of "Positive Atheism" or put search words "incest in Bible" and understand for yourself. What you are doing is pot calling kettle black!
RE:PORNOGRAPHY IN RAMAYANA
by Venugopalan on Jun 12, 2008 12:16 PM Permalink
Excuse us but we are discussing "Pak army and the jihadi's second coming". You just do not try to divert the attention from the main topic. You are not at all qualified to talk about immorality and indecency. We know how decent you are. First try to improve yourself and then correct others.
RE:BRAHMINS AS BEEF-EATER
by Khan on Jun 12, 2008 12:05 PM Permalink
very good samuel, why this hindu not following their god. they can handover their wives to muslim and can get more baby.
RE:BRAHMINS AS BEEF-EATER
by anirban banerjee on Jun 12, 2008 12:29 PM Permalink
U stupid convert. Don't forget during those days even your fore father were hindus.
RE:BRAHMINS AS BEEF-EATER
by Sonia on Jun 12, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
Dear Samuel , I am sure you have not read the Ramayana and gathered all the above facts from your friends who think like you.Hinduism is one of the oldest religion in the world and it also have survived many changes which is a must for any religion.Also may be I should tell you the fact that according to recent discovery by archaeologist , there was nothing called "Aryans" invading South India. Thats all a crap story.
Since 60 long yrs Indian are fighting so-called islamic jihad at all sectors of intrernational borders. It is high time that we need to re-think the policy of ours. We sometimes make move to UN, to USA, to other Big 8countries in world that Pakistan is doing such-& such,the are helping funding provocating Islamic terror to disable and break india.ISI their known govt.agency is always to be found behind that.India sud get rid of its noutankis in front of World & Pak,showing proofs of Pak hands in all sort of bomb blasts and attack which took us to 5 wars?India joining palm always requests to the world to pressure Pak to counter cross border terror & requesting world to declare this state A TERRORIST STATE.Y India in turn itself makes such move to declare Pak a terror state,without a nautanki cry to world.India should have taken such step to declare PAKISTAN:A TERRORIST STATE & ties severed,much before finding attacks on its parialment,but the chance was lost.On the other side Pakis are enjoing India nautankis. Indian citizens are been looted as taxes on their earning just because of ill-policy of the indian govt.& feeding Kashmiris.Y not India take a bold step to repeal Article 370, as it is approx 50 yrs been tried and no result found, isnt it a high time now? Rest of Indian citizens r paying for what so-called Kashmiri are enjoing.Think.Its would be easy to any1 to oppose my lines,but arent we citizens in looted conditions due to ill foreign politics of our govt.
RE:INDIA'S CRYING ATTITUDE ( INTERNATIONAL NAUTANKIBAAZ)
by ABCABC on Jun 12, 2008 11:57 AM Permalink
Leave kashmir to kashmiris if India has to prosper. Independent Kashmir will mean prosperous India.
RE:INDIA'S CRYING ATTITUDE ( INTERNATIONAL NAUTANKIBAAZ)
by Bakwaas on Jun 12, 2008 12:38 PM Permalink
we would have left it if Porkis and chinkis also leave it.
RE:RE:INDIA'S CRYING ATTITUDE ( INTERNATIONAL NAUTANKIBAAZ)
by vikas saboo on Jun 12, 2008 12:32 PM Permalink
thanx viki for ur aggression, betr show this to our HIJRE netas, but not to me........
RE:INDIA'S CRYING ATTITUDE ( INTERNATIONAL NAUTANKIBAAZ)
by vikas saboo on Jun 12, 2008 12:29 PM Permalink
well, i saw replies to my point, and Mr. Golden wat if i m not gud at grammer, atleast i hv made a point. 80% of our netas do not know to speak in English, I wrote here so that ppl read and make points to my thots its not that u marked petty things(GRAMMER PE MAT JAO, BHAONAO KO SAMJHO). further, its not the point to left out kashmir and make a independent state, its time to make TIT-FOR-TAT stituation against pakis. India shud make its policy wch suits itself, as Americans do and they are firm on their policies to make all effort for a PRO-USA policies. Thanx Viki too for ur aggresion, better show up these to our netas not me.
RE:INDIA'S CRYING ATTITUDE ( INTERNATIONAL NAUTANKIBAAZ)
by ABCABC on Jun 12, 2008 11:56 AM Permalink
Leave kashmir to kashmiris if India has to prosper. Independent Kashmir will mean prosperous India.
the article is good talks about the reality. but what it fails to address is all these people, zia, butto and all politicians had to give something for getting something.
all these jihadis had to fight, but waht does these army do is get the poor jihadis to fight aganist India in kashmir and many other states and keep the people of pakistan under fear that India might take pakistan in absence of army. Inreturn they get a huge salary and power to get what ever they want. so to get a hefty salary and to get things done without hardwork they need jihad or anything you claim
