guys wait for nxt election.. Advaniji ll bcome PM and Modi ji LL BE home minister.. den we ll c How POrkistani ppl stop us for doin worship in Taj Mahal..
All my muslim brother Please remember 200 gujurat. Refer wikipedia
RE:Wait for nxt election
by HP on Jul 25, 2008 12:19 AM Permalink
then lets break it , where are the Kar Sewaks, I finally got it, they came to Taj for surveying the Area and chalking out the plans for demolition , but only takklu buddha is busy fulfilling his last wish so i think modi is fit for the job he can team up with mayawati, any ways she had already planned to build Maya Taj Grand so some portion cud be left for these guys.
RE:Wait for nxt election
by HP on Jul 25, 2008 12:24 AM Permalink
so much for Modi and Taklu Buddha , they ruled for 5 years and cudnt build ram mandir in ayodhyay which was personally demolished by buddha, uma bharti and one other buddha , i forgot his name, anyways so you could understand these guys are incapable, i think you have to do the job and initiate it.
RE:RE:Wait for nxt election
by vaibhav garg on Jul 25, 2008 12:17 AM Permalink
how many revenges will you take? what was the reason of attacking parliament. asses like you should be thrown into arabian sea. it means you are a supporter of terrorists activities going on in india? why were the passengers burnt in godhra first of all? answer this, which events revenge was that? coward, justifying blasts as revenge.
RE:Wait for nxt election
by Rasheed on Jul 25, 2008 12:23 AM Permalink
Vaibhav, I agree blasts cant be justified. But I beg to disagree with people who refuse to club the Trishul wielding, blood hunting Sangh Parivaris as pacifists. By what stretch of imagination is that act different from terrorism.
RE:Wait for nxt election
by raju on Jul 25, 2008 12:17 AM Permalink
BON TON V REMEMBER GUJARAT GENOCIDE.U B HAPPY THT THIS IS THE WORST TIME FOR MUSLIMS.DO WHATEVER BAD OR EVEN WORST THING U WANT TO DO NOW.CUZ U WILL NOT GET BETTER TIME THAN THIS.NOT ONLY U BUT UR GODS IN US N ISRAEL AND OTHER WESTERN COUNTRIES R UNITED AGAINST ISLAM.V KNOW MUSLIMS WILL BE BUTCHERED AND MAIMED N GENOCIDE LIKE IT HAPPENED IN GUJARAT WILL B REPEATED BUT FUTURE WILL DEFINITELY BE FOR ISLAM.
RE:Wait for nxt election
by satyarthi on Jul 25, 2008 12:12 AM Permalink
think beyond elections. Start thinking in a positive way. Strenthen hindu organisations.
RE:Who is rama
by sanjay rai on Jul 25, 2008 12:12 AM Permalink
After sleeping with so many people wasym's mother never conceieved. finally she slept with few demons and the outcome was wasym. That is why he is playing with Gods and proving that he is a ba as ta rd. Be it Rama or jesus or Allah...they were saint of their times. People worship them and try to adopt their good habbit and those who can not they become Wasym!!! good luck..carry on with ur evil thinking.
RE:Who is rama
by ChalapathiRao R.M. Mudigonda on Jul 25, 2008 12:08 AM Permalink
Dear Wasym, Simply you can't understand it. One has to take birth after birth till he understands it. One has to strive and struggle for it. That's all' There can't be other answer to douting Thomasses!
25. Tavernier, a French jeweller has recorded in his travel memoirs that Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near the Taz-i-Makan (i.e.,`The Taj building') where foriegners used to come as they do even today so that the world may admire. He also adds that the cost of the scaffolding was more than that of the entire work. The work that Shahjahan commissioned in the Tejomahalaya Shiva temple was plundering at the costly fixtures inside it, uprooting the Shiva idols, planting the centotaphs in their place on two stories, inscribing the koran along the arches and walling up six of the seven stories of the Taj. It was this plunder, desecrating and plunderring of the rooms which took 22 years.
26. Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra recorded in 1632 (within only a year of Mumtaz's death) that `the places of note in and around Agra, included Taj-e-Mahal's tomb, gardens and bazaars'.He, therefore, confirms that that the Tajmahal had been a noteworthy building even before Shahjahan.
27. De Laet, a Dutch official has listed Mansingh's palace about a mile from Agra fort, as an outstanding building of pre shahjahan's time. Shahjahan's court chronicle, the Badshahnama records, Mumtaz's burial in the same Mansingh's palace.
RE:Europian doccumentation of Tejo Mahalaya and not Taj Mahal.
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:55 PM Permalink
28. Bernier, a contemporary French visitor has noted that non muslim's were barred entry into the basement (at the time when Shahjahan requisitioned Mansingh's palace) which contained a dazzling light. Obviously, he reffered to the silver doors, gold railing, the gem studded lattice and strings of pearl hanging over Shiva's idol. Shahjahan comandeered the building to grab all the wealth, making Mumtaz's death a convineant pretext.
29. Johan Albert Mandelslo, who describes life in agra in 1638 (only 7 years after mumtaz's death) in detail (in his `Voyages and Travels to West-Indies', published by John Starkey and John Basset, London), makes no mention of the Tajmahal being under constuction though it is commonly erringly asserted or assumed that the Taj was being built from 1631 to 1653.
RE:Europian doccumentation of Tejo Mahalaya and not Taj Mahal.
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:52 PM Permalink
28. Bernier, a contemporary French visitor has noted that non muslim's were barred entry into the basement (at the time when Shahjahan requisitioned Mansingh's palace) which contained a dazzling light. Obviously, he reffered to the silver doors, gold railing, the gem studded lattice and strings of pearl hanging over Shiva's idol. Shahjahan comandeered the building to grab all the wealth, making Mumtaz's death a convineant pretext.
29. Johan Albert Mandelslo, who describes life in agra in 1638 (only 7 years after mumtaz's death) in detail (in his `Voyages and Travels to West-Indies', published by John Starkey and John Basset, London), makes no mention of the Tajmahal being under constuction though it is commonly erringly asserted or assumed that the Taj was being built from 1631 to 1653.
RE:SEE MAD PEOPLE -
by wasym on Jul 24, 2008 11:51 PM Permalink
not mental pateints but sons of demons and evils,who are always looking to create rift among the peace loving people of india.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidence in historical Doccuments
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:47 PM Permalink
24. Moreover, the three mention neither the Tajmahal, nor Mumtaz, nor the burial. The cost and the quantity of the stone also are not mentioned. This proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was needed just for some supercial tinkering and tampering with the Tajmahal. Even otherwise Shahjahan could never hope to build a fabulous Tajmahal by abject dependence for marble on a non cooperative Jaisingh.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidence in historical Doccuments
by Bon Ton on Jul 24, 2008 11:52 PM Permalink
Dude dnt hate history..dere only u can c sum gud words for Islam. In current world Islam refers to terrorism.. And in future Islam will become itself a history !!
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidence in historical Doccuments
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:45 PM Permalink
20. Prince Aurangzeb's letter to his father,emperor Shahjahan,is recorded in atleast three chronicles titled `Aadaab-e-Alamgiri', `Yadgarnama', and the `Muruqqa-i-Akbarabadi' (edited by Said Ahmed, Agra, 1931, page 43, footnote 2). In that letter Aurangzeb records in 1652 A.D itself that the several buildings in the fancied burial place of Mumtaz were seven storeyed and were so old that they were all leaking, while the dome had developed a crack on the northern side.Aurangzeb, therefore, ordered immediate repairs to the buildings at his own expense while recommending to the emperor that more elaborate repairs be carried out later. This is the proof that during Shahjahan's reign itself that the Taj complex was so old as to need immediate repairs.
21. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his secret personal `KapadDwara' collection two orders from Shahjahan dated Dec 18, 1633 (bearing modern nos. R.176 and 177) requestioning the Taj building complex. That was so blatant a usurpation that the then ruler of Jaipur was ashamed to make the document public.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidence in historical Doccuments
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:46 PM Permalink
21. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his secret personal `KapadDwara' collection two orders from Shahjahan dated Dec 18, 1633 (bearing modern nos. R.176 and 177) requestioning the Taj building complex. That was so blatant a usurpation that the then ruler of Jaipur was ashamed to make the document public.
22. The Rajasthan State archives at Bikaner preserve three other firmans addressed by Shahjahan to the Jaipur's ruler Jaising ordering the latter to supply marble (for Mumtaz's grave and koranic grafts) from his Makranna quarris, and stone cutters. Jaisingh was apparently so enraged at the blatant seizure of the Tajmahal that he refused to oblige Shahjahan by providing marble for grafting koranic engravings and fake centotaphs for further desecration of the Tajmahal. Jaising looked at Shahjahan's demand for marble and stone cutters, as an insult added to injury. Therefore, he refused to send any marble and instead detained the stone cutters in his protective custody.
23. The three firmans demanding marble were sent to Jaisingh within about two years of Mumtaz's death. Had Shahjahan really built the Tajmahal over a period of 22 years, the marble would have needed only after 15 or 20 years not immediately after Mumtaz's death.
9.The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it.
10.The tradition of removing the shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have to be removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.
11.Visitors may notice that the base slab of the centotaph is the marble basement in plain white while its superstructure and the other three centotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs. This indicates that the marble pedestal of the Shiva idol is still in place and Mumtaz's centotaphs are fake.
12.The pitchers carved inside the upper border of the marble lattice plus those mounted on it number 108-a number sacred in Hindu Temple tradition.
13.There are persons who are connected with the repair and the maintainance of the Taj who have seen the ancient sacred Shiva Linga and other idols sealed in the thick walls and in chambers in the secret, sealed red stone stories below the marble basement. The Archaeological Survey of India is keeping discretely, politely and diplomatically silent about it to the point of dereliction of its own duty to probe into hidden historical evidence.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidences in Temple construction
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:42 PM Permalink
And lastly and most importantly...
17.The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats. Their name of Shiva is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of The Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28,1971) mentions that the Jats have the Teja Mandirs i.e., Teja Temples. This is because Teja-Linga is among the several names of the Shiva Lingas. From this it is apparent that the Taj-Mahal is Tejo-Mahalaya, The Great Abode of Tej.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidences in Temple construction
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 11:42 PM Permalink
Continued from above....
14.In India there are 12 Jyotirlingas i.e., the outstanding Shiva Temples. The Tejomahalaya alias The Tajmahal appears to be one of them known as Nagnatheshwar since its parapet is girdled with Naga, i.e., Cobra figures. Ever since Shahjahan's capture of it the sacred temple has lost its Hindudom.
15.The famous Hindu treatise on architecture titled Vishwakarma Vastushastra mentions the 'Tej-Linga' amongst the Shivalingas i.e., the stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu deity. Such a Tej Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.
16.Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an ancient centre of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents have through ages continued the tradition of worshipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal every night especially during the month of Shravan. During the last few centuries the residents of Agra had to be content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva temples viz., Balkeshwar, Prithvinath, Manakameshwar and Rajarajeshwar. They had lost track of the fifth Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Apparently the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev Nagnatheshwar i.e., The Lord Great God of Agra, The Deity of the King of Cobras, consecrated in the Tejomahalay alias Tajmahal.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidences in Temple construction
by wasym on Jul 24, 2008 11:43 PM Permalink
hello mr.illiterate, please go and take tutions from RSS and Bagrang dal.
RE:Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya evidences in Temple construction
by smash on Jul 24, 2008 11:46 PM Permalink
u guess u passed out from madrasa university..
