Please check this link ........it adds as a visual proof. stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm This site bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A5220 gives the BBC's view on The Taj Mahal and briefly explains both sides of the story that maybe Shah Jahan built the Taj and maybe he didn't.
ANY self respecting hindu will not vote for cong in next elections.
hindus do not want any special treatment but will actively oppose pseudo secularism activities like:
1 revocation of amarnath land transfer.
2. ram stu
3.afzal guru. etc etc.
madam treat hindus like shit-do you know inside coterie consist of christians only.she also wanted to make margret de cilva as cm of karnataka instead of sm krishna.
please vote out this anti common man congress govt.
RE:VOTE OUT CONGRESS(I)
by smash on Jul 25, 2008 01:37 AM Permalink
i am not able understand when some sixer hindus(who are not supporing BJP) will understand the fact.
RE:Ram was an Engineer
by rocker on Jul 25, 2008 01:28 AM Permalink
he is a known anti hindu and can stoop low to any level to humiliate hindus.his name means karuna(daya) and nidhi(treasure).but he exactly the opposite of his name.
RE:Ram was an Engineer
by SachinTheGreat on Jul 25, 2008 01:29 AM Permalink
Karunanidhi will be assasinated by his own party people one day.................
RE:Ram was an Engineer
by SachinTheGreat on Jul 25, 2008 01:27 AM Permalink
Kaunanidhi will bcome naked when his Dhoti is torn even if He eyes Ram Sethu, Now dont try to incite Communalism here, I abused Congress that does not mean U should get involved........................
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace. Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj.Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time. Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jaha
RE:Muslims dont understand their own problems............................
by Rasheed on Jul 25, 2008 01:20 AM Permalink
Fanatics are there in every religion. Backward thinking could reduce you too to that level.
RE:RE:Muslims dont understand their own problems............................
by SachinTheGreat on Jul 25, 2008 01:24 AM Permalink
The problem is when Congress encourages Fanatics of one particular Religion in the name of Secularism then the Fanatics of other main Religion grow and show their frustration.
History repeats itself, It has happened earlier duing Congress regime and it will happen again in Congress regime................
RE:Muslims dont understand their own problems............................
by HP on Jul 25, 2008 01:19 AM Permalink
wht will happen if these 32 million collectiviely scre*w your gusti
RE:Muslims dont understand their own problems............................
by SachinTheGreat on Jul 25, 2008 01:21 AM Permalink
Indian Army is enough for those 32 Million, BTW dont use internet so much and keep an eye on ur Amm-i coz She is Unfaithful just like U, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, LOL.
BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb it was a Hindu Temple !!
NOW READ THIS.......
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N.Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal:The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya). In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle,Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he
RE:Fact about Taj Mahal
by Rasheed on Jul 25, 2008 01:18 AM Permalink
Gopaal, I can't be your pal. Coz, you are much above me. You are king. you are "Emperor of Cut and Paste."
RE:Isnt this Hyporisy..........................
by Sunil D on Jul 25, 2008 01:15 AM Permalink
whats the co-relation between bombing in pakistan and a film in bollywood?? BTW have you seen "Ramchand Pakistani" ?
RE:Isnt this Hyporisy..........................
by HP on Jul 25, 2008 01:14 AM Permalink
maire samman ko tu lingam baanaa kar apne mandir me puj ta hey saale, bool apne behan ko use dud dale aur muje maza de
RE:Isnt this Hyporisy..........................
by Rasheed on Jul 25, 2008 01:15 AM Permalink
Sachin seriously, do you think Hindus and Muslims can live in peace. I just wanna know the radical viewpoint.
