And reasons Taj Mahal is a Temple Tejo Mahalaya with its Temple traits.
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 10:21 PM Permalink | Hide replies
9.The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it.
10.The tradition of removing the shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have to be removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.
11.Visitors may notice that the base slab of the centotaph is the marble basement in plain white while its superstructure and the other three centotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs. This indicates that the marble pedestal of the Shiva idol is still in place and Mumtaz's centotaphs are fake.
12.The pitchers carved inside the upper border of the marble lattice plus those mounted on it number 108-a number sacred in Hindu Temple tradition.
13.There are persons who are connected with the repair and the maintainance of the Taj who have seen the ancient sacred Shiva Linga and other idols sealed in the thick walls and in chambers in the secret, sealed red stone stories below the marble basement. The Archaeological Survey of India is keeping discretely, politely and diplomatically silent about it to the point of dereliction of its own duty to probe into hidden historical evidence.
RE:And reasons Taj Mahal is a Temple Tejo Mahalaya with its Temple traits.
by Gazanfar Z Azmi on Jul 24, 2008 10:25 PM Permalink
Yes I do agrre with your reasoning...Taj mahal should be demolished immediately...LOLz...
RE:And reasons Taj Mahal is a Temple Tejo Mahalaya with its Temple traits.
by Rasheed on Jul 24, 2008 10:24 PM Permalink
Since it is in Sanskrit and None other than Brahmin could not understand.
Now we have to teach it to Dalits and ask them to destroy ASAP.
RE:And reasons Taj Mahal is a Temple Tejo Mahalaya with its Temple traits.
by alert on Jul 24, 2008 10:52 PM Permalink
what is the shias and sunnies.. kurds.. muslims killing each other in massive way in the name of subsects of islam... it has never happened in hindus in such alrming proportion... even recently BUDHA stautues were destroyed in afghan by terrorists... why??? because of casteism in BUDHISM???? Terrorists because of their mad ideology have been doing this for the past 1400 years...
RE:And reasons Taj Mahal is a Temple Tejo Mahalaya with its Temple traits.
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 10:22 PM Permalink
Continued...
14.In India there are 12 Jyotirlingas i.e., the outstanding Shiva Temples. The Tejomahalaya alias The Tajmahal appears to be one of them known as Nagnatheshwar since its parapet is girdled with Naga, i.e., Cobra figures. Ever since Shahjahan's capture of it the sacred temple has lost its Hindudom.
15.The famous Hindu treatise on architecture titled Vishwakarma Vastushastra mentions the 'Tej-Linga' amongst the Shivalingas i.e., the stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu deity. Such a Tej Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.
16.Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an ancient centre of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents have through ages continued the tradition of worshipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal every night especially during the month of Shravan. During the last few centuries the residents of Agra had to be content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva temples viz., Balkeshwar, Prithvinath, Manakameshwar and Rajarajeshwar. They had lost track of the fifth Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Apparently the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev Nagnatheshwar i.e., The Lord Great God of Agra, The Deity of the King of Cobras, consecrated in the Tejomahalay alias Tajmahal.
RE:And reasons Taj Mahal is a Temple Tejo Mahalaya with its Temple traits.
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 10:22 PM Permalink
And Lastly and Most importantly.......
17.The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats. Their name of Shiva is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of The Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28,1971) mentions that the Jats have the Teja Mandirs i.e., Teja Temples. This is because Teja-Linga is among the several names of the Shiva Lingas. From this it is apparent that the Taj-Mahal is Tejo-Mahalaya, The Great Abode of Tej.
1.The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
2.The ending "Mahal"is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as "Mahal".
3.The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters "Mum" from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
4.Since the lady's name was Mumtaz (ending with 'Z') the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a 'J').
5.Several European visitors of Shahjahan's time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
6.The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
RE:Taj Mahal is indeed Tejo Mahalay evidence by Name
by BostonTechee on Jul 24, 2008 10:19 PM Permalink
Continueed ....
7.Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal, i.e., mansion apply to it?
8.Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Both its components namely, 'Taj' and' Mahal' are of Sanskrit origin.
RE:Taj Mahal is indeed Tejo Mahalay evidence by Name
by Tathagatha Mukherjee on Jul 24, 2008 10:20 PM Permalink
I agree that Hindus are to BLAME for this corrupt rotten system...nobody is to blame but ourselves. we have a slave mentality to some masters always in history...NOW our latest master is our babu political leaders. So it is unfair to blame any other community and Hindus have to take blame.
If you are sure that it was not a temple, then why don't you allow the interested folks to explore and find the really. That does not mean demolition. By not allowing, people to visit certain sections, Govt unncecessarily created an issue. This is similar to the issue of Netaji's life. Givt did not disclose and people are still suspecting Nehru.
RE:If you are so sure
by Rasheed on Jul 24, 2008 10:21 PM Permalink
You want another Babri Masjid. But, remember Indian people suffered a lot. Still....
Anyway Advani is tired, Bal Thakkeray is old, we have to find a new champion. But, the problem is now Mayavati is in news. She can also try.Anyway let us find out more issues for communal rift
RE:If you are so sure
by Aarti on Jul 24, 2008 10:38 PM Permalink
Rasheed,
First be a sensible person and then an Indian.
When something is said look at it from both sides.
Like a typical backward Muslim don't think that people are blaming Muslims. Understand, debate and think fairly.
The Mughals had perpetrated lot of atrocity on the Hindus and people who failed to convert to Islam. Because of the foolishness of Hindus though they were majority they had to be ruled by Mughals. Read history books to find out the facts for yourself.
RE:RE:If you are so sure
by khayum pasha on Jul 24, 2008 10:40 PM Permalink
Advaniji Dont worry for your failure in recent trust vote. You were desperately searching for reasons to boycott and save your face. Get ready Now Taj Mahal is ready for your agenda. You can have a cause to mislead paople and conduct andolanas for the demolition of Taj Mahal.
RE:If you are so sure
by Tathagatha Mukherjee on Jul 24, 2008 10:19 PM Permalink
I agree that Hindus are to BLAME for this corrupt rotten system...nobody is to blame but ourselves. we have a slave mentality to some masters always in history...NOW our latest master is our babu political leaders. So it is unfair to blame any other community and Hindus have to take blame.
Politicians are worse than terrorists. Killed innocent muslims in 2002 and sikhs in 1984 and made our hands stained with their blood...made me feel ashamed of being indian which i was always proud of...i can no longer say that i am proud of being hindu due to innocent broad minded nature of my religion.
RE:Hindus should behave more responsible....
by Milind on Jul 24, 2008 10:22 PM Permalink
innocent muslims, where did you meet them last... all muslims must be laughing at you Mr Tathagatha...
RE:Hindus should behave more responsible....
by Ravindra Saraf on Jul 24, 2008 10:19 PM Permalink
You should not forget to add that they also killed innocent Brahmins in 1947! (Well they are still doing it).
