-first of all let congress come out clear which is the original Ramayana? -secondly, if there is no proof of Lord Rama's existence or his sethu, let congress prove the existence of jesus or allah, else all the hindu organizations should take the initiative to raze to the ground all the churches and mosques. - is congress ready for it??
-first of all let congress come out clear which is the original Ramayana? -secondly, if there is no proof of Lord Rama's existence or his sethu, let congress prove the existence of jesus or allah, else all the hindu organizations should take the initiative to raze to the ground all the churches and mosques. - is congress ready for it??
-first of all let congress come out clear which is the original Ramayana? -secondly, if there is no proof of Lord Rama's existence or his sethu, let congress prove the existence of jesus or allah, else all the hindu organizations should take the initiative to raze to the ground all the churches and mosques. - is congress ready for it??
RE:Ramsethu
by devdass on Jul 23, 2008 11:10 PM Permalink
It looks like that the supreme sacrifice of Nathuramji has served no purpose and Hindus are as ever divided and alloow themselves to be exploited!
RE:CONGRESS IS NON SECULAR THOUGH THEY PREACH SECULARISM AND THEIR ASSOCIATES ARE EVEN MORE HINDU HATERS!
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Jul 23, 2008 10:46 PM Permalink
Abusing Hindu sentiment and appeasing jehadis and xtians is secularism in India.
Make no mistake, people are not going to allow this perverted approach for 2 long.
Ram may have needed that bridge then . But how is it relevent today when we need a passage that connects the east coast with the wwest coast of India, so that we can reduce money and time insted of curcumnavigating the srilankan island.Most of the crude that is comming from the gulf has to go through around srilanka costing a lot on shipping rates and delays. Let better sence prevail and let us construct the see tunnel that is needed now.
RE:Ram needed the bridge then India wants a tnnel now.
by Cricket s on Jul 23, 2008 11:07 PM Permalink
fair enough. As long as such rules are consistently applied irrespective of the religion then it is fair enough. Why people like MK are talking bad of Hindus? Will he do the same to xtians or Muslims?
This project is mainly implemented so that TR Balu and his DMK friends can make their money. One expert even claimed that ROI is not that good. Why waste tax payers money when you cannot prove the ROI?
You cannot worship something which has been destroyed," Nariman asserted - This is totally wrong. Several temples and shrines were destroyed during moghul emperors' time, some half destroyed. Still Hindus worshipped there! he must be mad to comment like this!
RE:Nariman and his logic.pooohhhhhh
by drax on Jul 23, 2008 10:54 PM Permalink
Good point for the opposing lawyer. May be this suggestion can be made to him.
