DURING 1989, THE LEFT ALONG WITH BJP COMMONLY FOUGHT FOR THE OUSTER OF CONGRESS (RAJIV GANDHI) AND EVEN FORMED A GOVERNMENT. DURING THAT TIME WAS CHOMNATH CHATERJEE SLEEPING IN HIS TOILET?????? (BEEDA SECULARIST). BUT NOW SUDDENLY IN 2008, HE HAS WOKEN UP AND HAS BECOME JUDO-SECULARIST LETS US NOT FORGET THAT SOMNATH CHATERJEE FOUGHT FOR SAURAV GANGULI’S INCLUSION INTO THE INDIAN TEAM AS A BENGALI ,EVEN A LALLOO PRASAD WILL NOT DO. HE ALSO GOT A SLAP FROM CHAPPEL, THE EX-INDIAN COACH, TO MATTER HIS OWN BUSINESS IN PARLIAMENT RATHER THAN INTERFERING WITH INDIAN CRICKET SELECTION POLICIES FOR WHICH “SOMNATH THE GREAT” CRIED. HE IS THE MOST PARTISAN SPEAKER TO HAVE ADORNED THE POST AND A CHEAPEST POLITICIAN. HIS INDICATION TO HIS PARTY THAT HE CANNOT BE SEEN VOTING WITH THE BJP (IMPARTIAL SPEAKER????) IS HIS REAL FACE. NO SPEAKER IN THE PAST HAS BEHAVED AS CHEAPER AS THIS PERSON. BUT, NOW HE IS ACTING AS IF HE IS A GREAT POLITICIAN WHICH THE NEWS CHANNELS CHEAPLY POTRAY AND POOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU ACKNOWLEDGE.
RE:CHOMNATH DHAA-REAL FACE OF PARLIMENTARY AWARD WINNER./ SUPER SECULAR SPEAKER.
by Bharama Banekar on Jul 24, 2008 12:55 PM Permalink
"BUT, NOW HE IS ACTING AS IF HE IS A GREAT POLITICIAN WHICH THE NEWS CHANNELS CHEAPLY POTRAY AND POOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU ACKNOWLEDGE" i would request you to speak for yourself and not for the entire country..its ur opinion and we respect that and would expect you to reciprocate it too..thank you
RE:Hi
by Bunty thakur on Jul 24, 2008 02:53 PM Permalink
U r right, the right 2 nake assumption is reserved with u only who r supporting venal PM and an Idiot FM who is enemy no 1 of salaried class. He only know putting tax on salaried class.
Is Speaker was truly un-baised and did this as a speaker he should do it non partisan .. then why the reaosn that he siad did not wanted to vote with communal BJP ... is this the reson a non partisan person would give ...
If he truly belived in the deal,he should have said , that he truely belive in the deal and oppsoe the party stand ... atleast that would have showed his charater that he have to leave the company of 40 years of comrades to support the deal ... atleast many who oppose the deal(not on party lines) would have see some point in it.
He is not voting against the UPA because he did not want to vote along with communal BJP .. here no national interest .. no party with 50 years of association .... true he may belive and followed secular values what he believed and adhered to what he belived ,,,, But it cant not be said he was not partial .. he will go down as one of the speakers who was very partial and always oppose the opposition party .....followed rules when opposition members were involved , not bother when his party or congress MPs was there .. And to say he is above the party so he did not resign is just media spin with somnaths socialist friends in the media
RE:Is Speaker truly unbaised .... as he is made to belive
by Indian on Jul 24, 2008 12:36 PM Permalink
Friend, this is the news story narrated by Rajdeep....why do u put your comments here, express ur views about Rajdeep, CD & cash..anyway, nice comments
RE:Is Speaker truly unbaised .... as he is made to belive
by Hind on Jul 24, 2008 12:41 PM Permalink
rajdeep be kya karega .. he too has his political inclination , that is not wrong .... can he with stand the congress/sp goonadas on one side .. .govet machinery on other side .... no ... we know the CBI will arm twist him .... after all he to is bal bacche wala ... no point in Bad mouthing Him ... One thing now no one should allow him when acts smart .,.. as if he can do anything for journalistic values and air his know every thing attitude .... what a farce..
IN INDIA, IF YOU ARE AN MP/POLITICIAN, YOU CAN HAVE MANY KEEPS. ONE OF YOUR KEEP MAY ALSO CAN HAVE A KEEP OF HERSELF BESIDES YOU. SO, THAT KEEPS DOG HAS ALSO GOT THE IMMUNITY/SPECIAL TREATMENT TO ENTER THE LOK SABHA OR ANY INFLUENTIAL PLACE BY BRIBING OR THROUGH INFLUENCE. SO, IT IS NOT SHOCKING/ DOUBTFUL THAT HOW THE MONEY CAME INSIDE. CERTAINLY THE MONEY WOULD HAVE NOT APPEARED ON ITS OWN.
The Hindu (and its offshoot Frontline)....Do not get misunderstood by the name, for it has nothing to do with the Hinduism. Though it is owned by the Joshua Soc.,Swizt., it is infected /proliferred by native (so called) leftists. Its (Left) editor in chief N.Ram along with Journalyst Chitra Subramanian went to northern Europe in 1988-89 to investigate the notorious Bofors scandal and their investigative journalism was funded by the Capitalyst Goenka (the express group). Both these "journalysts" are now tight-lipped wrt Bofors eversince their left masters supported the UPA. As for Rajdeep Sardesai; this man barking on the Modi's Govt.... may be aspiring Ramsesay or like...never heard crying for his fellow professional Daniel Pearl, who was butchered in Pakistan while approaching conclusive evidence to establish the nexus between the Paki militants-Taliban /Al Kaeida and the Pak Govt.
Our politicians are only a reflection of the people we are, we as a nation are a corrupt lot, we are fuming in anger over alleged MP taking bribes, if they did and abstained or cross woted its the MPs who should be taken to task not Manmohan Singh, friends this is politics and its the dirtiest of all conducts world wide in every nation, for centuries kingdoms and dynasties have been lost due political misdemenours and change of favours, if we need better governance we need to think why we wote for such unethical people.
RE:The CD that will be lost in translation..
by Indian on Jul 24, 2008 12:25 PM Permalink
thanks for preaching, friend....btw, speak out something about this incident.
RE:The CD that will be lost in translation..
by Bharama Banekar on Jul 24, 2008 12:45 PM Permalink
its not preaching....its his opinion based on above report..take it sportively and respect other's views .
It was BJP who consulted him for sting operation, but BJP was under impression that Rajdeep will take immidiate action & will broadcast it (as tehalka did), when Rajdeep has not done so & batrayed BJP, BJP was not having any option but display the same in the parliament, if this would not have been done, world would abuse BJP next day.
Having said this, there are series of questions. 1- Sting operation completed at 12-30, why did he not broadcast the news, immidiately (as Tehalka did)(perhaps he was negotiating his share of chunk)? 2-Under whose direction, he has not broadcast that news? 3-Where the loyalty of this person belongs? 4- Has he justified journalism- dharma?, 5- Was that news not worthy of being Breaking news, (like Shahrukh Khan got fever or Sachin Tendulkar is bleeding or Amar Singh's birth day celebration ?).........6- By the way, what are his credentials, credibility & contribution to indian journalism, so to award him with "Padmashree"?
He is not pro-congress, he is an anit-national guy & have displayed enough vulgarity & partiality during Gujarat riots.
It's high time that Media's business is tightly regulated, stringently monitored and code of ethics is fixed, these media persons has become extremely powerful in India.
RE:Rajdeep is Intecllectual Idiot - real threat to the country
by john thomas on Jul 24, 2008 12:34 PM Permalink
it seems the BJP was willing to pass this deal. but they wanted this deal to be done in their wule so to ascept defeat they did the last drama. if Advani had known that his MPs will be bribed then why he did not keep them locked in hotel or party offices as they used to do in assembly elections? this shows that they supported this deal but had to oppose the govt because they had no other options these parties are not intrested in nations growth but instead there own political setups there by growing there own pockets... let god save these politicans....
