Sincerity need not be taught by anyone to manmohan. It is easy to trap any one by saying that if u give bribe, i shall do. So the one who brings the proposal is making a bigger mistake
RE:RE:RE:Please answer these questions for yourself
by pramodm on Jul 24, 2008 04:20 PM Permalink
Look ahead. Never look back. No country that is divided on religion, language has prospered. But parties/individuals that engineered that division always prospered. Harmonay in diversity is the only route to properity. Do not fall victims of division
RE:RE:RE:Please answer these questions for yourself
by syedabdul azeemrizwan on Jul 24, 2008 04:54 PM Permalink
Dear brother,
Seems like you have a lot of venom against Muslims. Good that you have spit this out. I only have one suggestion for you, get your facts right and do not fall prey to partisan ideologies. All these politicians (BJP/RSS/Congress/Muslim League...)need some sensitive issues to divide people and rule. I urge you not to waste your valuable energy on spreading this hatred rather do your best in building bridges across various communities and regions. Our politicians are a smart breed, if religion does not incite people they will bring regionalism. Lets outsmart these politicians and make India one of the best places of this World.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Please answer these questions for yourself
by sanjoy goswami on Jul 25, 2008 10:37 AM Permalink
No venom against muslims Islam is a great religion like Hindu and Budhism Christianity and so on we are only devided by the politics like Saha Bano case common civil code and other preference in USA religious minorities are not given reservation. Muslims should start taking up modern lerning insted of studying in Madrasas we have dont learn sanskrit now but opt our children to go for modern schools where science language arts etc are taught only through knowledge one can enlighten him or herself.They should send ther son and daughter to learn then only there can be true upliftment or elso no way Sanjoy
Common indian public is smart enough now to understand the so called "Nexus" between Congress & major sections of Media (NDTV,CNN-IBN) in particular. As our politicians, this immoral journalists are also now exposed. Rajdeep should not try & claim high moral ground that they handed tapes to Speaker & abide by Law. Rather, you've been instructed to do so by Congress as now it seems even Speaker is in their bag. Only God/Bhagwan/Allah can save this nation. Didn't want to sound "Communal" :)
RE:Indian Politicians & Journaslist, who isn't immoral?
by Bharat Kr on Jul 24, 2008 05:52 PM Permalink
This ChampchaSri submitted the CD, after doctoring it. He have to save his ChampchaSri award giver fraud MM Singh and his Italian fraud master.
CNN-IBN is owned by CNBC and master is RAGHAV BEHL. IT IS SAID HE GOT PANICKED AS HIS CNBC DEPENDS UPON FINANCE MINISTRY
SO MR RAGHAV BEHL MUST EXPLAIN AS SOME BLOGGER POINT OUT THAT ACTUALLY HE WHO STOPPED TELECAST. SECOND SPEAKER OFFICE MUST RESPOND AS TILL MORE THAN 24 HOURS PASSED AND WE HAVE NOT HEARD FROM SPEAKER ON YESTERDAY DISGRACE INCIDENT HAPPENED IN PARLIAMENT.
TO BE NOTED OUR SPEAKER HAS NOT RESIGNED STATING HE IS ABOOVE POLITICAL PARTY SO HE MUST HAVE ACTED OR ISSUED STATEMENT TODAY ITSELF. PEOPLE WANTS TO KNOW THE TRUTH OF YESTERDAY DISGRACEFUL INCIDENT IN PARLIAMENT.
My question to Rajdeep Sardesai is this. Would he have done the same thing, if BJP had initiated such an exercise against Congress? Certainly not. He would have telecast the tape saying that upholding the freedom of information was more important than politics etc, etc.
Does anybody know what happens to the 3 crores now. Noone can claim it as the claimant would immediately become the prime suspect!!!!!! My suggestion would be that it is deposited in the PM's relief fund. Harini
This journalist is the worst amongst rabid reporters. It seems that he tried to do 'tehelka' but it backfired when the money was shown in the parliament. The link with CNN is highly suspicious. But the it is a loss of CNN to be seen as an associate of this not only most biased reporters but a biased channel.
