TV channels have no credibilty. One of the TV channels (perhaps CNN-IBN only) had earlier accused one lady school teacher of indulging in flesh trade by supplying School girls and in a sting operation even gave evidence of her reportedly indulgence in such trade by giving her pictures and voice recordings. It was later found the CDs were doctored. The TV Channel had to render apology. Another TV channel (again perhaps CNN-IBN) had shown 12 rooms of a hotel in Delhi that were hired where the Talwars (Arushi's parents) had reportedly spent that fateful night when Arushi was murdered.
Media knows no lows to which it can stoop just to gain TRP rating. It is shameful.
Who knows if this time too CNN-IBN has not doctored the CDs.
If the sting operation has been carried out on tapes they have no credible evidentiary value as they are more easily doctorable.
Did your reporters carry out the sting for the Speaker of Loksabha or for your viewers? They are reporters and once finished you should have published it on air-you are a television channel not private detective of the speaker of the lok sabha. Sure, the help investigations you can give a copy to him but not fulfilling your journalistic duty is highly despicable. Besides, by delaying the submission of the video you have lost all the more credibility especially keeping in mind your proximity to the congress party.
Well, thanks to the person and his clan. We still left with our hopes in this country intact. I think the politicians in this country ultimately will be erradicated by the goodness in its people.
His father was Dilip Sardesai, a great performer. This man is Raj-Dip Sardesai. Very immoral fellow compared to his father. Raj ( Govt) Dip ( Low) Sardesai
RE:Very Secular
by Jo Ho on Jul 24, 2008 06:11 AM Permalink
When UPA won the trust vote, I was watching this channel. The excitement among the presenters was worth mentionable. If it's a channel of the slave party (in other words, loyal to some Raj family), I've got a suggestion for the 'seculars'. Change the name of the channel to something more meaningful that signifies the views of the slaves. Correct?
RE:Very Secular
by Jo Ho on Jul 24, 2008 06:26 AM Permalink
If CNN-IBN and CNBC are not slaves to the royal family, how can this Secular Sardesai continue with his job there? I deeply respect CNN and NBC channels for about 2 decades. In US, I am not used to seeing any political bias - the question is why it's different in India. They must take action against the presenters particularly against this Sardesai. This degrades these 2 channels. I must inform it at the HQs in Manh unless some action is taken against them.
RE:Very Secular
by Jo Ho on Jul 24, 2008 06:16 AM Permalink
UPA's distribution of money is now a open secret. Now, we the regular people are afraid if there are some beneficiaries among TV channels too. I don't know what was stopping Mr Secular Sardesai showing it on TV. We just would have enjoyed the fun for a few moments.
Who knows how many MPs of the BJP the SP and Congress bought. No wonder there were such a large number of BJP/NDA MPs abstaining cross-voting. The nuclear deal being carried out in such a hurried manner is simply a way of ensuring a strong votebank come 2009.
I may have had a look. This I may have had a look kya je. English hai kya , kuch ut patang language. Either rediff has got the language wrong or Rajdeep is talking , writing chalta purat english. This "may have had a look", looks a bit like inquisition english.
