I HAVE NOT OBSERVE IN ANY COUNTRY WHO'S PRIME MINISTER IS AN ECONOMIST AND THE INGLATION AND PRICE RISE CAN NOT BE IN CONTROL, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF THE COUNTRY, I PRAY THE GOVT. LOOSE VOTE OF CONFIDENCE.
Dr Singh is trying too hard in kowtowing to the US's Dikat. May land up in foisting an unwanted election to coincide with the US Election. All the best Dr in ur efforts.
Dr.Singh is a honest person. Hardly he takes his family on his official trip to foreign countries. He does not know cheap and road side politics. But, BJP when it was ruling the country,Sh.Advani involved in all kinds of trading to coverup the MPs. During that time, he was roaming with money for horse trading. If govt collapsed means, Mayavati will become PM and ruin the nation with the help of criminals. On one final day BJP will withdraw support and like chandrasekar, mayawati will become unkown address in politics
RE:Its True
by Balaji on Jul 21, 2008 03:04 PM Permalink
Dear Mr.Rohit
Before decide about Sonia Please go through the history foreign country womens' services to India. Dr.Annie Besant for indian freedom movement,Nivedita for spiritual,Mother therasa for caring. So why you resent Sonia in Politics
RE:Its True
by rohit samm on Jul 21, 2008 03:10 PM Permalink
Dear mr. balaji, we are not here to qurell, the desk is for the discussion in the interest of the country, you tell me some respective name, but all they have done in their own interest. and i think we can not understand their purpose. so please keep concentrate on today's political population. please
RE:Its True
by Nautanki on Jul 21, 2008 03:12 PM Permalink
bals, Annie besant and Nivedita did not ride on Gandhi- Nehru family names. Also Mother Teresa. Sonya did not even seek Indian citizenship till Rajiv became PM. History thoda pado...
RE:Its True
by Govardhan Brown on Jul 22, 2008 04:29 PM Permalink
This Balaji sounds like Varghese who has been posting propaganda for Sonia Gandhi.
The 3 women cited by you did their bit, and left it at that. They did not seek to perpetuate their hold by passing on a 'gaddi' to their offspring like Signora Sonia is hell-bent on doing for Rahul Gandhi.
the ones who r against this deal r Al-Qaeda, Pakistan, China n the communists...........so, it is obvious whether the deal is good for the country or not......n wht the intentions of the left r......
what is the problem if the deal with US is being inked in such a way tht the americans have laid out certain special provisions for india which they havent even for China........whts the issue if we r building relations with US??......our enemies r against the deal n we r helping their cause, if certain illiterate sections of indian politics r opposing it........
RE:Nuclear deal if for the betterment if the nation....
by Halum on Jul 21, 2008 03:04 PM Permalink
you are too ignorant person..your 1st sentence prove that you are merely a 10 2 grade fail person who accedentally know how to write english.. 1st...If we sign this deal we will never be able to test or build Nuclear arsenal, while china will continue to do so.. 2nd..Us arms dealer will have a touch of huge thorium present in Indian soil.. 3rd..almost 90% of N-reactor will come under supervision of US.. 4th..Our N-energy will reach from 5.1 to 6.1%..but prices will be as high as 10%..is it worth to go for..?
RE:Nuclear deal if for the betterment if the nation....
by Balaji on Jul 21, 2008 03:11 PM Permalink
Do you feel that the meaning of "too ignorant". Insulting a person with his education is just shows your foolishness. Infact many of inventors of physics objects are school drop outs. You have to appreciate a person, who wants to communicate with his little knowledge. There is a story about a chinese guide. One day a chinese guide was narrating the great wall to group of US tourists. They all started laughing when he started narrating it in english. The chinese was very calm and finaly told them. My english is better than your chinese
After Rajiv Gandhi's death all the leaders have been spineless servile idiots...slaves of "phirangis". Just look at the body language of our leaders at the UN or other international gatherings and you will feel like they owe their life to the western leaders. I am not saying the western leaders are bad but rater that our leaders behave like Chaprasis in their presence. It is so insulting especailly given the fact that so many Indians are educated professionals and instead have people working for them in the west. The whole South Asian region behaves the same way. So in spite of this economic boom what has India done internationally to flex its muscle? NOTHING! This mentality will not go away I tell you. India doesnt have to be in the security council to make itself heard. I have yet to hear a novel idea or a political stance that would make people say we better listen given India's new found status at the world stage. How come I never hear India telling others how to solve energy issues. Or how come India doesnt speak out when Indians abroad are victims of racism or discrmination? They say that you are recognized by the status of your enemy. And believe me Pakistan doesnt have any at the world stage because its leaders have sold their country to foreigners. So India needs to stop obsessing about Pakistan etc and start frying bigger fish!
RE:RE:Stop Colonial Rule!
by Sahadevan KK on Jul 21, 2008 03:35 PM Permalink
Criminal MPs will come to the parliament tomorrow. If there is a lack of space in the jail please leave the criminals and take the Nuclear Criminals to the jail. It is a peace of advice.
RE:Stop Colonial Rule!
by Sunil Kumar on Jul 21, 2008 05:33 PM Permalink
Mr. Nawaz, you have hit the nail on the head. I feel ashamed to be an Indian. All of our people are gutless, spineless cowards and suck up to the white man!!!Absolutely agreed. But why did you not put Rajiv Gandhi in the list. The only person who really stood up to the West was a woman, Indira Gandhi who defied the West and liberated our thankless Eastern neighbour. Even the great diplomat, statesman Nehru wanted support from global powers and did not form a strong army with his lackey boy, the learned V.K. Krishna Menon. India is a servile country because its mentality is servile, same for Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Jews, Parsis. What we need is to use the West, strategize and then bring them down and enslave them.
RE:Sinngh is king part II
by c k on Jul 21, 2008 02:53 PM Permalink
After Govt. gets trust vote you will not get any reactor for Bengal or Kerala commie states.You deserve to live in dark stone ages.
RE:Sinngh is king part II
by Halum on Jul 21, 2008 03:06 PM Permalink
Ohh..yeah..really..?...only fool like you can say that India will be enlightened by only N power..ha ha what a joke..Nuclear energy only serves 5% of our daily needs..pathetic moron..
RE:Sinngh is king part II
by Rocky on Jul 21, 2008 03:32 PM Permalink
It is a fact that US Govt can very easily convince Indians trained (read bribed) earlier through the cushy jobs of World Bank, IMF etc. The entire lot of (Dr/Mr) ManMohan Singh, Montek S Ahluvalia, NK Singh, Rakesh Mohan, Sam Pitroda, P Chidambaram, RBI Gov. etc etc are oriented towards American Work systems and ethics. They are unable to look from the Russian, Chinese or Iranian outlook as they hardly know their ways and systems of governance or ploicy. Under the circumsatances they are going to speak the Bush or Clinton Language. They are not the ones as their earlier predecessors like Nehru and Saha etc who did not sign on the dotted line of NPT (Non Proliferation Treaty) - even Indira Gandhi did not buckle under the pressure of Nixon and LB Johnson. And here we are trying to bow down to the monopolistic Americans (who preach values and practice Abu Gharib, Guantamo, Iraq, Afganisatan and now maybe Iran). The falacy of the situation is when half of the Indian Polity is against the treaty then how can a country decide on a issue by a mere vote or two in the Parliament. The matter is more economic than political. The price for years of money paid in the form of postings and what not is being extracted from the Indian public. If Americans were so worried about the Indian nuclear energy scenario then let them first take back the sanctions appilied by Bill Clinton. A very small %age of GDP viz 0.05 - 0.1% if applied for solar or alternate enrgy res, prod wud solve this.
dear manmohan singh, Every indian rulers and kings who made relationship with british in pre-independence era acted only in national interest. but wat was the consequense and the price that they need to face it and citizens of india? Cant we really learn from all those things frm our previous experience and history? R u not ashamed of biting second time frm the same hole of a snake again? ofcourse we need nuclear energy as iran demands. but that should not be by keeping our head keeping on others. U got too late. it was ur fault without having a proper discussion on opposition.
Pakistan is already rejoicing that the nuclear treaty is being thrown to the dustbin! In this country and BJP and the Left also do not need to the treaty. We know that Pakistan is the enemy of India. So, if BJP and the left oppose the treaty, then they are supporting Pak indirectly! It also means that BJP and the left are anti-national!
Why can't we retaliate to what is happening right now, we can say yes to deal as whole .. and no to what is going around these days in politics.Don't we as an Indian have any right to say yes or no. We are the ones who made these politicians.
RE:n-deal is a bold step.
by Halum on Jul 21, 2008 02:51 PM Permalink
1t of all who told you that i am a talibani communist..? rather i presume you are a perfect taliban in your thought..The question is why India should sign the N deal, not what is happening between CPIM and Police..you are a pathetic joke..can give some reason why india should sign this deal..?..moron
RE:n-deal is a bold step.
by rajesh on Jul 21, 2008 02:46 PM Permalink
americans and britishers have good vision towards country and economy. do u agree this???if yes what wrong to become a slave to those visionary people. how america is commanding the entire world with just one third of india's population??
RE:RE:n-deal is a bold step.
by Halum on Jul 21, 2008 02:56 PM Permalink
Actually they have good vision about how to improve their economy and country not the others..The britishers developed so much because of stealing indian resources..Remember the economic movements in Manchester..they used us (since we were slave)...I pity on Indian freedom frighters..if they could have been visualised that one day India will produce son like you surely they would not fight against the britishers..
RE:n-deal is a bold step.
by rajesh on Jul 21, 2008 02:59 PM Permalink
dear halum, don't be like a frog in a well. can u name any sectors which has grown after democracy???before democracy there is no inflation at all. indian is showing progress only in rising population and creating global food crisis.
