Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 219 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Mamtha Banerjee
by Hariharan shankaran on Jul 21, 2008 06:31 PM  Permalink 

If voters abstain from voting as she does which party she will head in Election!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
What a Shame
by rajesh on Jul 21, 2008 06:24 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

//"People of Bengal are known for their individuality. And the Trinamool Congress has always stood by it. Therefore, Bengal will not go to New Delhi to vote. Rather, it wants New Delhi to come to our land and feel the pulse of the people," she added.//

what shame... she is asking the parliment to come bengal.. chi what kind of woman she is..i donno why people choose this type of people

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What a Shame
by bukkaraya krishna on Jul 21, 2008 06:40 PM  Permalink
After enjoying as a Central Minister under both the leadership, Didi now says that she cannot vote for BJP/Congress? Does she thinks that the memory of the people is so poor as Bengal people who forget all the mishappening in their state for 5 years and again vote for Commies and electing them for 30years.

She says that she doesn't want to go to Delhi and Delhi want to come to Bengal? If such is the case why she has contested the Parliament seat, to enjoy the salary & other benefits of an MP?
By keeping the Nandigram/Singur issue burning and forcing the people loose their lives she want to be in limelight and win alone this time that is why she doesn't want any help from BJP & Congress this time.
I challenge through this forum to Didi to make an announcement whether she is fielding her party candidates in the next coming Parliament elections, if so she has to clarify that on what basis she is doing so, as New Delhi cannot come to West Bengal.
Above all I want a clarification from Didi that is she thinking that no confidence motion against the Prime Minister is placed in west Bengal assembly, if not how she is thinking New Delhi to come to Bengal.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:What a Shame
by rajesh on Jul 21, 2008 06:38 PM  Permalink
hahaha
well said mamta kulkarni is far better than this mamta benerjee atleast she entertains the people with her exposing

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Heard Arjun Singh is modifying Vande Matram
by Sachidanand Shetty on Jul 21, 2008 07:03 PM  Permalink
Instead of Bharat mata ki jai he will make Italy mata ki Jai.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
MAMTA HAD MAMAT FOR CPI
by bhardwaj arvind on Jul 21, 2008 06:21 PM  Permalink 

Mamta is responsible for cpi m in power in west bengal because she shifts loyalties.In past she had done well when with BJP.Didi u should wake up and realise

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mamta Banerjee
by riten dash on Jul 21, 2008 06:16 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This lady is the worst face of Bengal.She and CPM are opposite side of the same coin.Like CPM she is escalating Bandh culture in Bengal and like CPM her policy is to muslimise the state.BC Roy gave away Berubari and was given Bharat Ratna. Jyoti-Buddha has given away the rural bengal to Bangladeshis through a systematic Vote-bank strategy so much so that muslims sucessfully tasted their muscle power in Nandigram.Now Mamta Banerjee is waiting in the wings to circumcise the hapless hindu community.She is being ably assisted in her target by ETV,Telegraph.Statesman and great intellectuals and artists like Aparna, Shuvaprasanna etc,etc.Days are not far off when we have to go to Unani hospitals for medical treatment and our children will go to madrasas for education.Allah-ho- Akbar.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
How to elect only the eligible & good candidates
by prashant pilewan on Jul 21, 2008 06:14 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Did any of us know that there is a system in our constitution, as per
the 1969 act, in section "49-O" that a person can go to the
polling booth, confirm his identity, get his finger marked and
convey the presiding election officer that he doesn't want to vote
anyone !!!!

Yes, such a feature is available, but obviously these seemingly
notorious leaders have never disclosed it. This is called
"49-O".

Why should you go and say "I VOTE NOBODY"... because, in a
ward, if a candidate wins, say by 123 votes, and that
particular ward has received "49-O" votes more than 123, then
that polling will be cancelled and will have to be re-polled. Not
only that, but the candidature of the contestants will be
removed and they cannot contest the re-polling, since people had
already expressed their decision on them.

This would bring fear into parties and hence look for genuine
candidates for their parties for election. This would change
the way, of our whole political system... it is seemingly
surprising why, and election commission has not revealed such a
feature to the public.... please spread this news to as many as
you know... Seems to be a wonderful weapon against corrupt parties
in India... show your power, expressing your desire not to vote
anybody, is even more powerful than voting... so don't miss your
chance. So either vote, or vote not to vote (vote 49-O) and pass this
info on...


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:How to elect only the eligible & good candidates
by Nandan Kumar Dey on Jul 21, 2008 08:28 PM  Permalink
Dear Friend, an excellent piece of information. However, I fear maybe many or most of these existing politicians are not aware of this and even if it is executed they will amend it to their convenience. And for sure for these kind of wrong purpose we may find like in or two such situations before that all the 543 MPs will come together whether secular, non-secular, castiest, communist (total national integration)....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:How to elect only the eligible & good candidates
by Parthasarathi Mridha on Jul 21, 2008 09:36 PM  Permalink
Very good piece of information, thanks a lot Prashanth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:How to elect only the eligible & good candidates
by bukkaraya krishna on Jul 21, 2008 06:29 PM  Permalink
Very grateful to you for such an important information and I try to share the same with all the people I know.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mamata
by bukkaraya krishna on Jul 21, 2008 06:11 PM  Permalink 

After enjoying as a Central Minister under both the leadership, Didi now says that she cannot vote for BJP/Congress? Does she thinks that the memory of the people is so poor as Bengal people who forget all the mishappening in their state for 5 years and again vote for Commies and electing them for 30years.

She says that she doesn't want to go to Delhi and Delhi want to come to Bengal? If such is the case why she has contested the Parliament seat, to enjoy the salary & other benefits of an MP?
By keeping the Nandigram/Singur issue burning and forcing the people loose their lives she want to be in limelight and win alone this time that is why she doesn't want any help from BJP & Congress this time.
I challenge through this forum to Didi to make an announcement whether she is fielding her party candidates in the next coming Parliament elections, if so she has to clarify that on what basis she is doing so, as New Delhi cannot come to West Bengal.
Above all I want a clarification from Didi that is she thinking that no confidence motion against the Prime Minister is placed in west Bengal assembly, if not how she is thinking New Delhi to come to Bengal.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mamta - politics as usual
by Rahul Guha on Jul 21, 2008 06:06 PM  Permalink 

There you go ... don't put your skin in the game. It's all about regional/power hungry politicking ....
This is the kind of polticians need to be ousted from Indian politics ...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mamata Benerjee should understand
by Khangembam Romesh on Jul 21, 2008 05:59 PM  Permalink 

As a leader, Mamta Benergee should think that it is not the right time to play dirty politic Indo-US nuclear deal is people's agenda. If Trinamool Congress stands with people, then she would come to the Parliament and join two day debate on the issue. To abstain from trust vote, is not a right decision. It indicates that she is waiting for a political gain, not for people's gain. If she thinks N-deal is against the nation, she can vote against the motion. And if she thinks it is national interset, then she can vote in favour of the motion. Her decision shows her lack of responsibility for the country.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 219 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message