UPA has now become a sinking ship. Rats are jumping out of it for their own survival. For common men nuclear deal is not at all an issue. Neither it is an issue for the largest party in opposition. The main issues are inflation due to the wrong policy of Dadhiwallah and Lungiwallah. Appeasement of Muslims and Christians is another burning issue. Hindus are being divided in the name of castes. Our PM is being operated by two remote. For domestic affairs the remote is in the hand of Ms. Sonia and for international affairs the remote is in hte hands of Bush. UPA must be thrown out at the earliest.
This cheat is talking about National Interest.Says N-Deal is not in national Interestas if he is worried about national interest.In fact in 2004,after the lok Sabha election 39 Muslim MPs,from Congress,Muslim League,Marxists etc got together to plan the 'national interest' viz to review the action taken by these MPs for advancing the cause of Islam in India.This is their National interest
People like Shahid Siddiqui are Traitors... they can go to any extent for their personnel benefits.. they use and spoil the name of religion for their benefits. Same Last time Najma Heptuallah join BJP for her benefit.. she thinks at that time that BJP will make her President of India.. and switch from congress. They dont have any thing for betterment of India or religion. these people are Opportunist.I am muslim Alhumdulilah but i support nuclear deal in the interest and betterment of my beloved country India.
RE:Siddiqui is Opportunist
by MumbaiChhokra on Jul 19, 2008 08:20 PM Permalink
Hats off to you my friend !!! WE all are first Indians and then Hindu,Muslims etc.What a nobel thought,but very few will acutally follow it.
RE:Siddiqui is Opportunist
by KHURSHID SHAIKH on Jul 19, 2008 09:00 PM Permalink
you are wrong. many will follow. One more thing if you are a true Hindu or a true Muslim than only you will be a true Indian. think over it. because it is difficult to find someone who has respect for and love for the country. patriotism is there only talks not deeds. If we strictly follow our respective religions than we will be afraid of God and not hurt our fellow brothers and sisters. we would help poor. we wont hate any one we will love all. we wont take bribes to do our job for which we already take salaries.we wont add water to the milk we supply to our fellow Indians. we wont manufacture and sell life sav ing spurious drugs. we wont take lacs of rupees to give admissions to students in the schools and colleges. the list is long I can not recall now. may be you can add something. If someone is fearing God and has the belief that after one is dead one has to go to either Heaven or Hell as per one's deeds. than, this country will be like heaven on earth.
RE:Siddiqui is Opportunist
by Virgo on Jul 20, 2008 09:25 AM Permalink
Khurshid, very noble thoughts. But, why do we need religions to tell us to do those things? Aren't those principles of humanism, compassion and integrity? Friend, we really don't need religions to tell us those high morals.
People like Shahid Siddiqui or Traitors... they can go to any extent for their personnel benefits.. they use and spoil the name of religion for their benefits. Same Last time Najma Heptuallah join BJP for her benefit.. she thinks at that time that BJP will make her President of India.. and switch from congress. They dont have any thing for betterment of India or religion. these people are Opportunist.I am muslim Alhumdulilah but i support nuclear deal in the interest and betterment of my beloved country India.
The LOK SABHA constituencies are being restructured. THE BASIS - Population of the region. What does this mean for us - 1. This simply means - if some region has grown in population , it deserves and will receive more representation in LS
2. Sounds good as a concept but we all know its a number game at lok sabha - one such game is on today in delhi, and like earlier games UP holds the trump card.
2. UP and bihar (original complete states) send 84 and 54 MPs resp. to Lok sabha
3. gone are the days when UP sent people like Nehru, lal bahadurji to lok sabha. Today people like mulayam, mayawati and goons sitting in jails hold the cards. This is JUST because they have numbers.
4. restructuring based on population would mean more MPs from these states
5. States like kerala and some north eastern states will be the biggest losers - their crime - they worked hard to control the poulation growth. - result - LESS NUMBERS IN LS - less say in central politics
These 2 states are at the bottom of all the growth indicaters - economic or social. industris, employment, social grounds like infant mortality, girl child death, rapes, crimes agnst women - they are at the bottom in each list. These figures show the performance of the governance (read politicians - and NOT POOR PEOPLE) and we are likely to have more of them on national level. SOUNDS PSSIMISTIC BUT GET READY TO BE GOVERNED BY GOONS GUYS
RE:indian parliament restructure - From bad to worse
by Joy Abraham on Jul 19, 2008 08:45 PM Permalink
If we believe in democracy, the numbers are vital. An individual in Kerala and in UP/Bihar has equal rights. So number of MPs will be based on population. If Kerala controlled population, they benefit from it - of cource having fewer MPs is a slight disadvantage. But will there be big difference in the development of Kerala, if Keral had 24 MPs instead of the 20 now?
RE:indian parliament restructure - From bad to worse
by Vikram on Jul 19, 2008 08:48 PM Permalink
Such restructuring will divide India. Why should those states which make attempts to control population should pay for idiocy of UP, Bihar, etc.
RE:indian parliament restructure - From bad to worse
by Vishy on Jul 19, 2008 09:08 PM Permalink
The process of restructuring is already on my friend - this could be the scene in next gen. elections. and having lesser MPs is naturally a big negative - in a house which has serious money / food crunch its important that the resources are divided equally and the lazy guys are kicked so that they improve, but if the lazy guy has the might he will eat others' food and equality will remain a CONCEPT to be studied by PHD aspirants only. so like i said its a number game - forget regionalism we simply want more good guys in Loksabha isnt it ? which looks impossible with this new formula
RE:indian parliament restructure - From bad to worse
by Vikram on Jul 19, 2008 09:16 PM Permalink
A state like Tamilnadu whose population has seen limited growth since 1960's(when the last restructuring of loksabha according to region was done) will not allow it's MP's to be dwindled. Even AP, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat have not seen so much growth. These are very powerful states. Things are not as simple as you think. If they go ahead with such stupid ideas, India will certainly be divided. Let the ullu, agarbatti, kanchiram, go to hell or shut their mouth.
RE:indian parliament restructure - From bad to worse
by Vikram on Jul 19, 2008 09:23 PM Permalink
Forget all other states. One Tamil Nadu will make a lot of noise if they go ahead with such policies. It will only increase separatist mindset.
RE:RE:indian parliament restructure - From bad to worse
by Vikram on Jul 19, 2008 09:25 PM Permalink
It's better if people in UP/Bihar are withheld of their voting rights. They deserve nothing more than cattle..all they do is produce is babies and crap.
uptill now what wrong soniyajee has done?Bechari she lost her mother-in law,her husband.she was not ready to enter active politics after rajeevjees death.after years of persuasion by congressmen she came into active politics.india was in a precaurios situation after bjps rule with kandahar and kargil.finally indian ppl brought soniyajee.she refused prime ministership which no politician will do addu at this age is dyeing to become pm.she managed the coalition for 4 years. long live soniyajee-saviour of the nation.
RE:soniyajee
by RK Express on Jul 19, 2008 08:09 PM Permalink
INDIA WANTS "LEADERS" and "NOT JUST PROOF READERS". Sonia can't be a good PM and she knows that better, than an Indians of your caliber.
Myth #14: The deal is not primarily about making money; it is about creating a new U.S. strategic relationship in south Asia.
Fact: The deal is primarily about making money. The main effect of the deal will be to pardon India – to remove it as a violator of international norms. After such a change in status, there will be no impediment to U.S. arms sales. This is where the real money is, not in nuclear reactors. U.S. exporters have mentioned selling as much as $1.4 billion worth of Boeing airliners, hundreds of F-16 or F/A-18 fighter jets, as well as maritime surveillance planes, advanced radar, helicopters, missile defense and other equipment. The Russian press has even complained that the nuclear deal is a ploy to squeeze Russia out of the Indian arms market.
RE:The deal is primarily about making money
by santosh satpathy on Jul 19, 2008 09:33 PM Permalink
Read again its a 'deal' between two countries ,not charity??
whats wrong if some one makes in exchange his service ??
Since February 20th, Bhopal survivors are once again risking their health and livelihoods with an 800-km walk to Delhi to assert their fundamental rights to justice and a life of dignity and health. Their demands are straight forward, reasonable, and are urged a second time, because promises given by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh after the 2006 march to Delhi are yet to be met.
Your support will make a huge difference. Send a free fax direct to the Prime Minister's office to tell him that he MUST meet his promises and end the ongoing disaster in Bhopal.
The fax is made up simply of the image below and the details that you enter at the bottom - we require ALL of these in order to guarantee authenticity (as we are not able to get your signature online)
After you press send, your message will be queued by our web-to-fax system for delivery!
RE:Send a FAX to the Indian Prime Minister
by HP on Jul 19, 2008 08:12 PM Permalink
Why are you wasting yours and everyone time here you think PM is bothered to receive your Fax msg.....only Fax he wants to receive is from Left....declaring bandh in Vijay Chowk area on July 22 .....but must be in his dreams......if he was interested in fulfilling his promise he wud have done it after receiving 2nd or 3rd reminders not after 5617th of them.
Taking a perch in BSP now and his past run show what he is. Running around parties each day is his firm stand. Such people will be good for nothing and they only looks for money.
At the end of the road missiles and bombs are waiting for us, after a few kg Uranium for which a few billion USD will go to USA. Art 103 says that IAEA can make any report against India (means report for sanctions or military action to Security Council) for ANY non-compliance by India regarding the safeguards agreement. So wait for US missiles over Mumbai, Chennai and Bangalaru in 2014.
If anyone knows an MP tell him so that he can consider National Interest - let him not be ignorant.
RE:Caution: Dangerous Article 103
by Vishy on Jul 19, 2008 08:18 PM Permalink
india isnt banana republic my friend - we are not a small country now in terms of popln and ECONOMY- this lack of confidence is one of the main diff. between us and chinese. Mumbai, Kashmir or Kanniyakumari is safe. As much safe as any city of the world. US fobia is stupidity
RE:Caution: Dangerous Article 103
by Dinesh Sharma on Jul 19, 2008 08:19 PM Permalink
So it'll be better idea to run away & save your life. China will definately be a safe harbour for all commies. BTW , it will be a Paki Nuclear Bomb which will destroy India & not a US one. And India will be more safw with strategic alliance with USA , as their Intelligence are deep indside Pakistan & they have better control over their Nuclear Arsenal than any other country. US had already saved India in 1962 , against Chinese Aggression & Now also US will never want to destroy India due to their Business Interest & as a stretegic counter weight against China. Only becuase of America , China is afraid of attacking India , otherwise they had already occupied Arunachal Pardesh & Sikkim. So , in the scenario of two Powers, you've to be on the side of any of these & India was with USSR in Cold war Days & nor when China had taken place of USSR , there is no option left for India than to be on the side of USA , as it cant trust on China , who has already occupied thousands miles of Indian Land & want Arunachal & Sikkim as well.
RE:Caution: Dangerous Article 103
by Joy Abraham on Jul 19, 2008 08:50 PM Permalink
US saved India from Chinese agression in 1962? Funny story. China captured whatever they wanted to and still keeping it.
Did you forget the more recent Bangladesh war? US sent their 7th fleet navy to attack India to help their ally Pakistan. Because of the communist soviet support and the courage of Indira Gandhi, USA was humiliated and went back without firing a shot and we won the war.
US is afraid of India overtaking them economically and militarily in 20-25 years. So they will try all they can to delay it. An attack under some pretext is one way of achieving that goal.
