RE:crying crying crying only crying in rediffmail. carry on friends.
by Inquilaab Zindabad on Jul 17, 2008 06:22 PM Permalink
its good for frustrated mind
RE:WHO IS THE MOST HATED IN THE LEFT FRONT
by Vijay Swaminathan on Jul 17, 2008 07:20 PM Permalink
Theek Bola - "Yeh Churi" - Back stabber of the nation
RE:WHO IS THE MOST HATED IN THE LEFT FRONT
by praful nikam on Jul 17, 2008 07:09 PM Permalink
What u people are doing is this a way, u know how they all are loyal to INDIA, last 60 yrs congress change, BJP change but left still as it is.......... Loyal means loyal to distruction of country..... they are lot superior in distruction i cannot give any budy no one all are master in distruction...... Best example:= west bengal now become Waste Bengal
RE:WHO IS THE MOST HATED IN THE LEFT FRONT
by abc ghi on Jul 17, 2008 06:17 PM Permalink
u r right but you forgot to add surjit..i think he is after karat
RE:WHO IS THE MOST HATED IN THE LEFT FRONT
by Arindham Samanta on Jul 17, 2008 07:58 PM Permalink
Don't forget Mr Joti Basu.. I think he should be in the first position
RE:RE:WHO IS THE MOST HATED IN THE LEFT FRONT
by Deep Gupta on Jul 17, 2008 08:27 PM Permalink
All Commies are alike. Illegitimate coz Indian communist parties were formed in Russia and China. Mind they call themselves Communist Party of India (Marxist) Communist Party Of India bla bla bla and not Indian Communist Party. Jab China ya Cuba mein barsat hoti hain tab ye log chhatri khol ke bahar nikalte hain.
RE:WHO IS THE MOST HATED IN THE LEFT FRONT
by Sudharsan on Jul 17, 2008 06:02 PM Permalink
I think there is enough hatred within themselves - at each other ;-)
RE:WHO IS THE MOST HATED IN THE LEFT FRONT
by dAytimE sAinT on Jul 17, 2008 05:59 PM Permalink
My choice is Prakash Karat. he is the most venomous snake.
Many honest Congressmen come to me or write to me from the various provinces that communists have no principles save of keeping their party alive and beating their opponents with any stick that came to their hands.
In this letter, it is also mentioned that Bhulabhai Desai who was preoccupied and not keeping well was one of the members of the tribunal suggested by communists to have the charges against them examined)
Now in Communist own party people started revolt against Prakash Karat and his ideology. Somnath Chattrejee & Subhas Chakraborty 2 shocking betrayal see lot more revolt for Karat & party to come from West Bengal. You can't make poor people fool for long time by not doing any progress and forcing your ideology.
RE:Somnath Chattrejee & Subhas Chakraborty srarted revolt against Prakash Karat and his ideology.
by ashok patil on Jul 17, 2008 05:57 PM Permalink
This is a sign of something like Garbochev initiaetd in Ex-Soviet Union. Independent thinking person in CPM
RE:RE:Subhas Chakraborty???
by dAytimE sAinT on Jul 17, 2008 05:50 PM Permalink
ALL LOSERS ARE NOT COMMUNISTS...BUT ALL COMMUNISTS ARE LOSERS...he heee
RE:Communal party-
by Sudharsan on Jul 17, 2008 05:53 PM Permalink
I think we need to advice the likes of Oxford to change dictionary meaning of the word secular. It just means anti-hindu.
The left Party is like a private limited company with bunch of fools. Karat himself could not win an election and he dance as per his Chinese counterpart’s tune. Now a days we can view so many “Left leaders’ on the TV media, good for nothing and they can’t win a general election with their own. With the support of 3 states, they are ‘controlling’ whole India. They have no vision, no concrete ideology and nothing and worthless. Once they opposed Computer, then machineries, Tractors, Express Highways, Metros etc. After 20 years they recognised. This is their agenda. Now they are opposing Nuclear deal, after 20 years they will support. For each and everything they have to oppose but they have no alternative. They will not let others to accept ADB fund, World bank fund, American treatment. But once they in power there is no problem to accept it with both hands. Now it is happening in Kerala. During the previous UDF government at Kerala, these so called CPM and company opposed ADB fund but now they enjoying with the funds. They opposed self financing Institution during the previous govt and that time 50% quota reserved for poor students. Due to Left’s blunder strikes now there is no quota reservation, no fees concession and also these left party has no issue at all. One thing Buddhadeva Bhattacharya can do, Manmohna can’t. That is their policy. India’s ex-President, Nuclear Scientist and also a Muslim Dr.APJ says the deal is good f
RE:Left & their ideology !!!
by joydip bhattacharya on Jul 17, 2008 06:44 PM Permalink
Budhhadeb come out with your strength in Bengal and go against this Karat...... how he can run a Party when he does not have any mass Support......
RE:Somnathbhai' Stance
by Taral Prakash Bhatt on Jul 17, 2008 06:35 PM Permalink
Why did he tolerate his party's nonsense for this long? He should be dumped in the garbage bin along with other communists and their n number of parties. Taral
The story of Communist betrayal of the freedom movement is sickening. The CPI newspaper kept denouncing Gandhiji and Subhas Chandra Bose as "blind Messiahs" and accused them of decadence. In February 1941 the Communist wrote that "the national movement under bourgeois leadership has entered into a blind alley". The Communists heaped abuse on Gandhiji, the Congress. Jayaprakash Narayan and Subhas Babu, and denigrated the clarion call of "Do or Die" as an indication of bankruptcy of thought.
K.K. Chaudhari in his Book Quit India Revolution: The Ethos of Its Central Direction:
Chaudhari says that "on many occasions the Communists were indeed more royalist than even the King of England". In submissions to Sir Reginald, Joshi showed what a splendid job he and his party were doing to break up the Quit India Movement. Chaudhari writes that the 120-page report "could not have been improved by any other collaborator of the British or by any quisling". Joshi was so anxious to prove the CPI's utility to the British rule that he claimed that he was doing a better job of stemming the Quit India Movement, of denouncing Subhas Babu and leaders of the Congress underground. than the government itself! Notes Chaudhari: "The tone and contents of Joshi's performance report reveal crystal clear what the CPI had done to sabotage the 1942 movement."
On the Communist Support for Creation of Pakistan he writes
RE:Traitor Left before Independence:
by Pappu Nuni on Jul 17, 2008 05:45 PM Permalink
By incessant and vociferous repetition Communists proclaimed the thesis that (1) India was not one nation but a collection of several separate nationalities. (2) the demand for Pakistan is a just and democratic one because Hindus would oppress them in future; (3) the Muslim League itself has become progressive and secular and Jinnah himself was secular and anti-religious and (4) the Congress must concede to the Muslims the right to self-determination."
Benediktov Diary:
The diaries of former Soviet Ambassador to India IA Benediktov give a good Insight on various acts of CPI. The Benediktov diaries form part of the Russian Archives Documents Database at the National Security Archive of George Washington University, Washington, DC. Excerpts from the diaries can be accessed on the website of the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson Centre in Washington, DC.
One of entries describe a conversation with the Secretary of the National Council of the Communist Party of India (CPI), Bhupesh Gupta. During the conversation, Gupta urgently requests Soviet financial aid for the Indian party for use in an upcoming election campaign; the answer conveyed by Benediktov ten days later suggests that the Soviets responded positively to the request, although the amount is not indicated:
RE:Traitor Left before Independence:
by Pappu Nuni on Jul 17, 2008 05:46 PM Permalink
Followed by:
Today I received Gupta at his request. Gupta communicated that on 16-17 January a meeting of the Secretariat of the CPI took place in Delhi, at which was discussed the future work of the party apparatus in connection with the death of A[joy]. [Kumar] Ghosh….Gupta said that he desires that the ties of the CPI and CPSU do not become weakened in any way after the death of Ghosh. The assistance in various forms and the comradely advice of the CC CPSU have always been enormously useful to us, he underscored….Gupta said that no other party, not even the communist party of China, can occupy in the hearts of Indian communists the place which belongs to the CPSU… Gupta reported that after the death of Ghosh at the present time in the party there is an acute insufficiency of means for the preelection campaign. He expressed the fear that with the death of Ghosh the source for receiving means for the communist party from the CPSU might be closed. These questions were handled by Ghosh alone, Gupta underscored. He never consulted with him /Gupta/, and even less with [Elamulam M.S.] Nambudiripad and G. Nair/ with the latter two only about using the assistance/. All these matters were held in strictest secrecy from other leaders of the party and members of the National Council. This explains the fact that not a single report on this question has appeared in the press.
RE:Traitor Left before Independence:
by Pappu Nuni on Jul 17, 2008 05:47 PM Permalink
Gupta said that he cannot singlehandedly take on responsibility in questions of assistance, therefore he considers it necessary to consult with Nambudiripad, whom he characterized as a person of crystalline honesty and whom Ghosh trusted. Gupta confidentially reported that A. Ghosh had not consulted on this problem with Akhmed or with [Shripad Amrit] Dange, who once proposed that he entrust to him alone all matters connected with the receipt of aid from abroad.
The Mitrokhin Archive II: "The Mitrokhin Archive" refers to the collected notes taken by Vasili Mitrokhin over 30 years. They became public following his 1992 departure from Russia to Great Britain. The notes purportedly contain Soviet intelligence operations details obtained from KGB archives. Mitrokhin was a Major and senior archivist for the USSR's foreign intelligence service and the First Directorate of KGB.
In this he describes:
The CPI was funded in many ways, including transfer of money through car windows on Delhi roads: “(C.) Rajeshwar Rao, general secretary of the CPI from 1964 to 1990, subsequently provided receipts for the sums received.” Then there was the infamous rupee-ruble trade: “In 1959, the CPI general secretary, Ajoy Ghosh, agreed on plans to found an import-export business for trade with the Soviet bloc, headed by a senior Party member codenamed DED...Within little more than a decade its annual profits had grown to over 3 million rupees.”
RE:Traitor Left before Independence:
by Pappu Nuni on Jul 17, 2008 05:48 PM Permalink
Mrs Raj Thapar former communists of "Thapar couple Fame:
Mrs Raj Thapar former communists of "Thapar couple"' fame in her memoir "All These Years (Penguin, 1991)" writes "To this day I cannot fathom what lay behind the communist support for the idea of Pakistan, what vested interests possessed them to waste their cadres, their energy, to help what obviously the most reactionary trend in our political life. And of all people, (Mohan Kumaramangalam), who I then thought had devoured all the basic writings of Marxism, how could he hold, support, back and supply Jana was with the intellectual arguments he so urgently needed."
A Glimpse thru Mahatma Gandhi's Letter
His letter to Communist leader P C joshi on June 11, 1944 on How Communist Betrayed Labour Leaders: Role of Communists was so illustrious that even Mahatma Gandhi got wind of their deeds.In his letter to Communist leader P C joshi on June 11, 1944 Gandhi himself talked about the Communist party helping the authorities arrest the leaders of labor unions.
