Coming first to the current hot topic of Left front's withdrawal of support to centre, I wish to inform you that first of they should not have supported a minority government. If they have done so, it is only because they wanted make hay while the sun was shining.
Ideologically both the groups differ by a long way and this was coming all the time. One is pro labour other is pro capitialists.
Regarding BJP being non communal - please let me know Why? The name of our country is Bharat named of after the son of Dushyanta and Sakunthala and grand son of the sage Viswamitra. Were there any muslims before Md.Gahazani invaded India ? Were there any Christians before britishers came to India? Do the Hindus have the same right the so called muslims have in Pakistan, Bangladesh orin other muslim countries. Hindus have been battered and butchered by every community and the day when Hindus will become minorities in India is not far way . Even judiciary has given verdict against hindu sentiments in the Ramsetu case. Any one can guess what would have been the judement if it was affecting the sentiments of muslims or christians .
It is true that west Bengal has unbroken record of sending the maximum numbers of left MPs in last 30 years and still it has no say in CPM Politbureau .... second leftist state Kerala has been sending and flip flopping between congress and left ,
Despite all the leftist MPs from West Bengal.. they are left out of any say at the center...
CPM politbureau has been hijacked by rootless fellows like Prakash Karat & power brokers like Yechury who have not won even a municipal elections.
These fellows have thrown out Jyoti Babu and prevented bengal leftist to occupy any important position in CPM.Karat is like Greg chappel who showed finger to Kolkat ,same way Karat/Yechury showed finger to Somnath da when Somnath da wanted to contest Vice president ..
CPM politbureau is full of oppurtunist like Karat & Yechry who are opposed to west bengal welfare..although they derive power from MPs ..
I think Bongs are realising that they are being taken for a ride for far too long!!!!
RE:West Bengal has been taken for ride by CPM politbureau & spoiled bengal ,once aprosperous state
by Koduvayur on Jul 17, 2008 01:02 PM Permalink
It seems Saha Kk has gone for damage control. The infighting in his party has upset him too much.
RE:West Bengal has been taken for ride by CPM politbureau & spoiled bengal ,once aprosperous state
by galilio on Jul 17, 2008 01:12 PM Permalink
why benagali people hate towards hinduva which
BJP talks to support majority in the light of minority appeasement? are bengalies not hindu?
do they not believe in hinduism ? bengal produced vivekanda,aravind ect who spread the
sanadana dharma throughout world. why bengalies
hate supporting bjp which is the only hope for hindus while congress,communists are engaged
in curtailing the growth of hindu dharma -
a) allowing bangaldesh muslims to settle down in assam and west bengal so that hindus are marginalised with vote power by muslims.
b)special quotas to muslims,special laws,special
subsidies to muslims,
c)conversion agenda by allowing christianity to
spread in south india and in northern states to reduce hinduism.
d)opposing all anti conversion laws enacted by bjp govt to stop conversion.
e)not checking the inflow of funds from missionaries who work closely with terrorists organisation like LTTE.land grabing,mass build up of churches in south india,hindu temples funds and money is spend for other religions.
one day hindus will realise the truth but it will be too late for people living in kerala and west bengal.
RE:it is ok to be corrupt, inefficient, morally bankrupt, opportunistic, dynastic,...
by shah jafar on Jul 17, 2008 01:02 PM Permalink
No Savarkar. One has to be chest beating, killer , rioter, shooter, murderer like, capable of burning , raping women, killer of unborn girl child. long live u and ur breed.or for a change anti national and beggar for mercy from foreigners.u must be knowing , whome i am referring?
RE:it is ok to be corrupt, inefficient, morally bankrupt, opportunistic, dynastic,...
by RAVINDRAN MANNYAN on Jul 17, 2008 01:12 PM Permalink
Mr.Shah are you mentioning about hapenings in Punjab and bengal during partition of india?
RE:RE:it is ok to be corrupt, inefficient, morally bankrupt, opportunistic, dynastic,...
by RAVINDRAN MANNYAN on Jul 17, 2008 01:15 PM Permalink
Mr.shah do you pakistan army failed to reach srinagar in 1947 followed by independence? They spend most of their time to rape hindus at the boarder.
RE:it is ok to be corrupt, inefficient, morally bankrupt, opportunistic, dynastic,...
by shah jafar on Jul 17, 2008 01:19 PM Permalink
THATS NICE. I WAS EXPECTING SAME MANYAN.HARPING ON SOME FALSE PROPOGANDA. BRINGING PAKISTAN IN EVERY DISCUSSION ABOUT INDIA WHEN U HAVE NO ANSWER.BUT U KNOW WHOME I AM REFERRING TO IN PRESENT SCENARIO.DONT U?
RE:RE:it is ok to be corrupt, inefficient, morally bankrupt, opportunistic, dynastic,...
by All Right on Jul 17, 2008 01:21 PM Permalink
:) When you bring the undefined term "secular" into the discussion, others will bring Pakistan into the discussion too...
You have your prerogative, what makes you think others don't have theirs? ... absolutely one sided thinking, in my opinion.. ;-)
RE:it is ok to be corrupt, inefficient, morally bankrupt, opportunistic, dynastic,...
by RAVINDRAN MANNYAN on Jul 17, 2008 01:31 PM Permalink
now you came to the platform Mr.Shah. I know what you have mentioned.But you please understand that killing and raping is an act of unsrupulous society. what has hapened in the current scenario is the balance sheet of 1947.those people at the border states might have ever remembering memories of atrocities.This is the cause of sharp divide in the relation between hindus and Muslims at the boarders. blaming every thing against hindu organisation increases make the situation worse.political parties may say any thing for vote bank.hanging behiond them will not make any thing good for the situation.
RE:it is ok to be corrupt, inefficient, morally bankrupt, opportunistic, dynastic,...
by shah jafar on Jul 17, 2008 01:10 PM Permalink
u know buddy. who is killer of unborn girl children. rioters. u know it. so i dont need to elaborate, SOD.
Democratic centralism is the uniqeness of CPIM.Every party member can question the party,not in public but in the respective party forums.And this man breached that.
Everybody who knows abt the functioning abt CPM knows,How they arrive at decisons. No prakash karat or jyothibasu can take a decision.In the case of Nuclear deal also,Prakash represnted his party opinions effectively(not his own).But meadia just tried to sabotage his image by saying, his ego is the reason behind the crisis. If u wnat to critizice cpim,u can do that. But y ur trying to protray a "man of integrity" as a villian?
The most important thing for rediff is the interest of America. This is because rediff is the owner of India Abroad, which is an american newspaper, founded by Gopal Raju. Thus, in order to make the Indians in US comfortable, rediff.com aggresively lobby for the American interest.
RE:Rediff
by RAVINDRAN MANNYAN on Jul 17, 2008 01:07 PM Permalink
exactly what it is! Also rediff employees participating in discussion under hide name to propaqate pro US sentiments.
i donot agree with somnath chatterjis statement that he is neutral as a speaker, and that he is opposing party line coz they are voting with bjp. i wud like to ask, him why did he ask for consensus while being elected, didhe not think bjp was communal?? at that moment he accepted, before he was speaker he belonged to cpm ,he continued to be one after he became speaker, now what is diff? i wud agree if somnath says after the elections are announced he will retire from politics coz he was speaker and the post is abv party affiliations. these guys talk fm their hats, they are always aligned and take sides. in fact the deputy speaker must toe the akali line if it comes to it, he is member of party first then dy speaker. cpm shud banish somnath if doesnot resign.
