Now our comrade Somnath chatterjee is expressing his displeasure to vote along with Communal BJP.
I put 2 questions to somnathji:
1. Where had gone your sanctity when voted with coomunal BJP during the (3) no confidence motions against PV Narasimha Rao's government.
2. You are reluctant to work together with communal BJP. But what permitted you to work with more coomunal and pro pakistani parties Muslim League and MIM. Your secular credentials not effected when working with Pakistani parties
Is there any hypocrate than these chamchas of China i.e. communists
RE:Problem to vote with unholy BJP
by Nageswara Rao on Jul 17, 2008 03:25 PM Permalink
It is not BJP which told that they are ashamed to vote along with Coomunists. It is Communist who told they feel ashamed to go along with BJP
RE:Problem to vote with unholy BJP
by Sudharsan on Jul 17, 2008 03:17 PM Permalink
I asked a similar question before. Left and Congress are all pseudo secular. They only believe Hindus are communal and others secular. They dont understand a religion is a strong belief just like they themselves believe in their leftist ideologies. Its time to show the doors to the UPA. Sick of these idiots.
The communist leaders show their poor sense of economics when the speak of IT engineers salary, film star's compensation, cricketer's earnings, etc.
They should know it is the market price - based on what is the potential value delivered by the person providing the service. If a SRK is paid X crores, it is the producer who is taking a risk. The producer knows he can recover it by selling the end product at a profit.
If one goes by the Minister's logic, all of us will have to be paid only what can pay for two square meals and nothing else, because many others do not have that kind of earning potential.
The minister loses focus of the administrative and executive responsibility in enabling the poor to overcome the hurdles they face. If they are not able to ensure two square meals inspite of so many sops, one knows what is happening in the name of the sops. The ministers, their cronies in administration, the contractors, etc gobble up all the funds the ministries release. The poor man is used as a tool by those manning the executive machinery, politicians, and the contrator network to swallow tax payer money.
For how long can the poor tolerate the foolish policies of such politicians.
Now if one were to really raid ALL the politicians, government officials, and contractors to find out how much ill gotten wealth they have stashed - you will be shocked.
Let there be raids on all politicians to uncovered stashed wealth.
RE:Catch the corrupt politician and official machinery, not the enterprising private sector...
by Super Star on Jul 17, 2008 03:45 PM Permalink
This is communist speaking, my dear friend. This is what CPM stands for. Make every Indian poor and miserable like the cycle rickshawallahs of Kolkata!
Communist ideology. Better to die with hunger & poverty but not work and earn money under a capitalist system.West Bengal is the biggest Example of Communist ideology where 60% of population lives in Slums.
RE:Subhas Chakraborty and Somnath Chattrejee revolt against communist ideology.
by raj on Jul 17, 2008 03:13 PM Permalink
citymayors.com/report/slums.html
RE:Subhas Chakraborty and Somnath Chattrejee revolt against communist ideology.
by Demo-crazy on Jul 17, 2008 03:12 PM Permalink
How many communist leaders live in Slums? How many of them die of hunger and poverty?
They are sucking the blood of the poor by such idiotic thoughts, instead of enabling the poor to overcome the hurdles posed by population growth, lack of education, healthcare, wrong policies on agriculture and irrigation, etc.
RE:Subhas Chakraborty and Somnath Chattrejee revolt against communist ideology.
by Ramesh Mure on Jul 17, 2008 03:16 PM Permalink
Raj is pheku...More than 41 per cent of Kolkata’s (Calcutta) slum households have lived in slums for more than 30 years.
"There is something wrong with the deal for India"-Whats wrong?Why cant u explain it to the commomn man of India instead of creating this situation where u r forced to be on the same side of BJP, where the common man ie ur votebank (not the party cadres & forced voters)donot understand what u r upto, where the internal party conflict-difference of opinions over the santity & priority of the speaker's post in line with Indian Constitutional Democracy/Parliamentarian ethics over the duty of a party cadre- come out in the open? Everything what u have created over last 60 years or so, whatever progress u have made is lost. This will cost u as the blunder u have caused by disowning Netaji. See how they r projecting it as proIndia -pro country & Left as antiIndia. What a mess u have cerated the Left movement!
if you are talking about HINDUS you are comunal.......if you are talk about terrorist muslims.....your party is secular......that is the definition of both the words in indian politics........some day congress will change the name of coutry from hindustan to musilimstan.........mera bharat mahan.
RE:bjp communal????
by Rajunov Singh on Jul 17, 2008 03:11 PM Permalink
Its not the congress or the communists that are to blame. We Hindus are to blame. Anyway it is too late. Just pray for another partition. We will get it right. No Nehru, no communists or stinking liberals. Only hard-core Hindus. Hindu Republic shall prevail.
RE:RE:bjp communal????
by Demo-crazy on Jul 17, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
Why do you need a partition to achieve what you wish? Even now those who do not love to be part of Bharat / Hindustan can go to wherever they wish.
RE:bjp communal????
by Demo-crazy on Jul 17, 2008 03:16 PM Permalink
The communists could be wearing burqas to celebrate the day congress does what you say!
For patriotic Indians (particulary those who are not ashamed to call themselves Hindus), communists and congress are one and the same. Both need to be banished if India were to progress.
Subhash Chakraborty has raised a non-issue. The issue before the people is whether to reject the anti-national nuclear agreement or not.. After all, we are not signing a bilateral agreement. we are signing an agreement under the US energy act, 1954. Manmohan singhji is doing the same what King Jehangir did in 1600. People should firmly reject the agreement.
RE:Unnecessary issue
by Kakali Chatterjee on Jul 17, 2008 03:09 PM Permalink
He Bhagwan! Why cant u explain the 1954 Act & 1600 deed for those who were not there at that time for better understanding
RE:Unnecessary issue
by sam thomas on Jul 17, 2008 03:19 PM Permalink
subhash chakravarty is a man of steel and has guts thats why he is questioning PRAKASH KARAT.It is the brahmin prakash KARAT Rulling after all what was he doing all these 4yrs .he found virtue in withdrawing support today only ..WHY? .yES IT IS KERALA VERSUS BENGAL .Kerala politicians especially the leftists only know how to get rice from the centre whereas bengal politicians take away all industries to bengal and now PRAKASH KARAT is crying fowl on nuclear deal .He is planning to align with BJP ....
Somnath is no angel. He has sold his constituency to the real estate sharks. It was such a pristine land of the nobel laureate Tagore, which is now so ugly!!
The only reason Somnath wants to stay on is the power and prestige. No reason of the country is his concern or worry. He is simply too arrogant for that.
RE:Somnath is no angel
by sameer bhosale on Jul 17, 2008 03:18 PM Permalink
You are perfectly right!I will further add that when the Congress has alliance with the Muslim League,he doesn't find it wrong but as BJP tries to protect interest the pseudosecular politicians like him find BJP as communal party.What an hypocrisy!
RE:RE:Somnath is no angel
by sameer bhosale on Jul 17, 2008 03:19 PM Permalink
I mean when BJP tries to protect the interests of the majority community.
1) A person who has entered the LOK Sabha on a party ticket, how can he claim to be an independent person ? 2) A person who is supposed to act against erring MPs who do not toe their party line.. in this case what will be the remedy for the CPI M if he does not resign. 3) Was the Speaker not aware of the political tension between the UPA and left group for a couple of months wherein the General Secretary of the CPIM has time and again threatened to withdraw support and vote against UPA Government. Why the Speaker kept quiet all these days so also his protege at Kolkata, Subhas Chakraborty. Why they did not take up these issues in the inner party forum and sort out the issues before the leftists withdrew support.
The above questions need answers.
Though I have personally no liking for CPIM or Prakash Karat, Chatterjee is unnecessarily making an issue of it.
1) Please go through the our contitution. Speaker must a member of Parliament who is elected on a party ticket.Right. Now he is elected as Speaker by all MPs(includes opposition).Right. He then becomes the coodinator in the parliament who must be independent. ok Mr.Ramakrishna.
2) What do you about Mr. Somnath Chatterjee? Do you know his background? He has been elected best MP three times a row. Do you know this?
Here I can say that CPIM must not force Mr.Chatterjee to resign because Speaker is above the party politics.
3)Do you know the party stucture of CPIM(oops !!! I forget you don't have any personal liking for CPIM)? There is a central committee ,whose general secretary and the members decide what are agendas. If I am right niether Mr. Somanth Chatterjee nor Mr. Subash Chakraboty are the members of central committee.So they are protesting niether aganist withdraw support from UPA nor aganist to Vote against UPA.
RE:Somenath chatterjee
by Umesh Sharma on Jul 17, 2008 04:45 PM Permalink
tuhin, pls tell us if the vote is a tie, does the speaker vote or not? he does, where is the case of being non partial. again as per the rolls he is cpm mp if party issues a whip and his name figures in the list then he has to follow the party diktat.
