Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 186 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Freedom for whom?
by pavitran vittal on Aug 30, 2008 02:16 AM  Permalink 

From ancient time Bharath ( India) permitted diversity and accepted many culture to mingle with mainstream . History is very clear about Kashmir . We all are belong to one country and family since time Immemorial. Is it possible to get freedom from ancient root , culture and blood? No one can change his own root by changing affiliations. Kashmir people are part of India and India is part of Kashmir. Any illiterate lay man can under stand this very easily. The Kashmiri brothers and sisters are known for their hospitality , rich culture , brave and above all the humble respect and love for unknown visitors.

Only terrorist supports pretends as Freedom or the so called Azadhi lovers , they are not from Kashmir at all , If the terrorists group feel that they are not part of India Then have no right to stay in India, they should live the place. They may be welcomed some where in the original place where they come from. India is country for every existing religions of world and respect all religion very deeply. WE KNOW GOD IS EVERY WHERE since time immemorial.

It is very surprise to note the so called leaders of freedom , never raised question or wised to inform the people of Kashmir regarding the Pakistan Government donation of 5000 Sq . Kms part of Kashmir to China . It is clear proof that the so called lovers want to hide many facts of their black and secret killing business.

The terrorists and supporting leaders use the term freed

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Freedom for whom?
by pavitran vittal on Aug 30, 2008 02:13 AM  Permalink 

From ancient time Bharath ( India) permitted diversity and accepted many culture to mingle with mainstream . History is very clear about Kashmir . We all are belong to one country and family since time Immemorial. Is it possible to get freedom from ancient root , culture and blood? No one can change his own root by changing affiliations. Kashmir people are part of India and India is part of Kashmir. Any illiterate lay man can under stand this very easily. The Kashmiri brothers and sisters are known for their hospitality , rich culture , brave and above all the humble respect and love for unknown visitors.

Only terrorist supports pretends as Freedom or the so called Azadhi lovers , they are not from Kashmir at all , If the terrorists group feel that they are not part of India Then have no right to stay in India, they should live the place. They may be welcomed some where in the original place where they come from. India is country for every existing religions of world and respect all religion very deeply. WE KNOW GOD IS EVERY WHERE since time immemorial.

It is very surprise to note the so called leaders of freedom , never raised question or wised to inform the people of Kashmir regarding the Pakistan Government donation of 5000 Sq . Kms part of Kashmir to China . It is clear proof that the so called lovers want to hide many facts of their black and secret killing business.

The terrorists and supporting leaders use the term freed

    Forward  |  Report abuse
cont.. Measge
by r on Aug 25, 2008 08:46 AM  Permalink 

To all Porkistanis
I suggest you concentrate on your own problem specially the long neglected economy 25% inflation

    Forward  |  Report abuse
A MESSAGE TO ALL PORKISTANIS
by r on Aug 25, 2008 08:44 AM  Permalink 

To all those pakis calling for right of self determination in Indian kashmir,will you give the same right to balochistanis or pashtoons in NWFP.No?Why not?
I suggest you concentrate on your own problem specially the long neglected economy 25% inflation

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Kashmir!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
by r on Aug 25, 2008 08:35 AM  Permalink 

In 1947, Indian troops entered J&K AFTER the state signed the treaty of accession. The Maharaja was the person duly authorized to sign that treaty and he got the popular leader (Sheikh Abdullah) to endore it just for good measure. The Maharaja requested India to send urgent military assistance because his state was being ILLEGALLY attacked by Pakistan supported militia (very similar to the Taliban situation of recent years). After driving the invaders out from most of J&K, INDIA approached the United Nations for resolution to the dispute. The UN placed the blame squarely at Pakistan’s door and asked it to vacate the territory it was illegally holding and withdraw all military forces. 60 years later, Pakistan it yet to fulfil this UN demand.

Anyhow, Indian Kashmir has been governed (albeit ineptly) by local Kashmiri’s elected in open/free multi-party elections for a majority of the time since 1947. Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, on the other hand, is ruled by an appointee of the Pakistan government in Islamabad … the locals have no elections, no representation and absolutely no say in the matter.

The trouble in Kashmir is Pakistan’s mischief for the most part … conceived, trained and funded by ISI. As Indians, our dispute is not with Pakistan or ISI … they are simply doing what they think is in their best interest. We are mad at our government for not protecting the life and property of Indians …that is Job #1 for every government. We want govt of India to put an end to this no

    Forward  |  Report abuse
PROACTIVE NOT REACTIVE
by r on Aug 25, 2008 08:28 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

India should do what the Russians did in South Ossetia…
take decisive action instead of pandering to separatists who just want to keep this problem boiling for their political benefit and try to divide Indian muslims.

The problem is that we have a weak govt at the state and center to push through the needed action.

As a proud Indian muslim, I want them to ensure law and order prevails and then make sure the electoral process is set in motion. As it is the state govt is inept and that’s why the others are stepping into their leadership.

Net net, India needs to act and not just talk.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re: PROACTIVE NOT REACTIVE
by Guest on Aug 29, 2008 09:19 PM  Permalink
At a time when the world talks about freedom of press, people in Kashmir have been restricted to go through the dailies or watch news and current affairs programme on local channels. Due to curfew, local newspapers have not hit the stands and TV channels have stopped airing their programmes since Monday morning. It's days now since the international media watchdog, Reporters Without Borders, called upon Government of India to lift the restrictions on media in Kashmir. The state government on Thursday came up with a statement denying that any restriction has been placed. Reacting to this, a spokesperson of Reporters without Borders told Greater Kashmir said, "Of course, the areas affected by press freedom violations are Kashmir and North East states. He informed that in 2007, India was at the 120 rank on 169 countries in press freedom index by RSF. The index measures the state of press freedom in the world. It reflects the degree of freedom that journalists and news organizations enjoy in each country, and the efforts made by the authorities to respect and ensure respect for this freedom. According to the report by RSF Israel (Israeli territory) was at 44, Kosovo was at 60 rank and Iceland stood at the top rank. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers. "We are bei

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: PROACTIVE NOT REACTIVE
by manoj n on Sep 01, 2008 11:17 AM  Permalink
my dear muslim friend.. all this is due to the militant insurgency in kashmir...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: PROACTIVE NOT REACTIVE
by RealIndian on Sep 08, 2008 02:40 PM  Permalink
You kashmiri's,jis thali mein khate ho usimi ched karte ho..you are talking about freedom of opinion and expression,,are you not getting it..15th august you guys only missused the freedom of expression,,taking extraadvantage of freedom by hosting pakistani flag on lal chowk..any answer for this?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: PROACTIVE NOT REACTIVE
by Guest on Aug 29, 2008 09:13 PM  Permalink
you r proud to be indan Muslim and should be but think of your brothers who are showered bullets everytime they ask for their rights. You as a reposponsible Indian should must be aware that India a so called democratic nation is responsible for Human Rights voilations in kasmir for the last 60 yrs and the latest in the list is information blackout.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Peoples for Dead Pakistan=PDP
by r on Aug 25, 2008 08:21 AM  Permalink 

All harboured the desire of separatist Islamic state, during their period of Chief Ministership, and they supported it. After Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad, Ghulam Mohd. Sadiq was installed as Prime Minister of Jammu and Kashmir in February 1964. During his time the State witnessed many political changes. The nomenclatures of Sadr-i-Riyasat and the Prime Minister were changed to Governor and the Chief Minister respectively. As a result of the efforts of Sadiq, the National Conference was merged with the Indian National Congress. The Praja Parishad Party had already merged with Jan Sangh. Sadiq adopted a policy of liberalisation towards Sheikh Abdullah. On the other side the Sheikh had not abandoned his old policy and activities and naturally he followed the same old path.

Government of India did not try to come out of its politics of self-interest to see the real shape of the dangerous problem in Kashmir. It did not even bother to examine the gravity of the situation. Political leaders of Kashmir too spoke different languages and kept on changing their stances. A nationalist of today became a traitor tomorrow and after sometime the same became a nationalist again. In Delhi, Kashmiri leaders are Indians. These very people remain worshipper of "Kashmir nation" in Kashmir and whenever they go to Pakistan, they become pro-Pak. This character of politics of Kashmir continues till today without any hindrance.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
This is the truth
by R Prasad on Jul 18, 2008 05:37 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This gentleman is telling the truth.
The PDP is actually a wolf in the garb of a sheep.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:This is the truth
by Malay Roy on Jul 20, 2008 12:22 AM  Permalink
I have heard General Roychowdhury mentioning twice on TV that PDP was the overground wing of the Hizb ul Mujahideen. He should know, and has not even been contradicted.So our secular state,had the distinction of having a terrorist as Union Home Minister and later Chief Minister.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Congress politics
by sg sg on Jul 17, 2008 11:51 AM  Permalink 

Congress will share power with a party totally opposed to India soverignity a party that seems to be taking orders from across the border. What kind of national party do we have. And what kind of people do we have in this country that gives them support. But then the congress has never given them enough for the first 45 years that they can think beyond the struggle to get the next meal, so where does national security fit into the aam admi's agenda. With that they have played games so harmful to the nation and refuse to learn. So what is their agenda in bull dozing their minority appeasemnt policies without a hitch.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
POD LEADER MUFTI MOHD SAYED A WORST COMMUNAL / PRO PAKISTAN POLITICIAN
by vijaybareth on Jul 17, 2008 10:26 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

PDP Leader Mufti Mohd. Sayed has a worst record of selfishness, greediness during his political life. Anyone can remember the event of releashing of hardcore terrorists in the exchange of his daughter Rubia Sayed, while being Union HOme Minister, which gave a very coward example of tackeling the situation. Instead he might have shown his courage and nationhood to battle with the terrorism. Thereafter he many times become the master destablising the elected government and thereafter imposing the governor rule in the state thrice during his political career. Influneced by greediness he formed PDP, and from the day one he is engaged in pro pakistani, anti indian propoganda in the name of healing touch. He spent crores of rupees of indian taxpayer in providing the monetary support to the families of terrorists in the name of healing touch, however, he never had a blink over the problem is being faced by the kashmiri pandits, the bonafide resident of that state. Such a worst, selfish, cowardish Politician should by boycotted by the rest indian public. However, he is enjoying the benefits of indian politics but loyal to the indian nationhood.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re: POD LEADER MUFTI MOHD SAYED A WORST COMMUNAL / PRO PAKISTAN POLITICIAN
by zaheerkhan on Sep 01, 2008 07:17 PM  Permalink
The truth is she wasnt even kidnapped. She went on her own and the propoganda was that she was kidnaped. She used to get food from her house every day. They just wanted to release the terrorists and thats whay created all this drama. In fact PDP is the worst party I have ever seen. They are totally pro-paki. people should teach them a lession in the elections if & whenevr it happens.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 186 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message