Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 334 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:GUYS YOU ALL MISSED IMPORTANT CLAUSE OF THE N-DEAL
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 12, 2008 03:12 PM  Permalink
-
Too extreme.

Avoidable comment.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:GUYS YOU ALL MISSED IMPORTANT CLAUSE OF THE N-DEAL
by Deepak Yadav on Jul 12, 2008 03:14 PM  Permalink
I Apologise, if offended.

It was commented on a lighter node.

I love Sikhs for their bravery.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:GUYS YOU ALL MISSED IMPORTANT CLAUSE OF THE N-DEAL
by P Satishkumar on Jul 12, 2008 03:20 PM  Permalink
Mr.Manmohan Singh is the Prime Minister of the India and not heading sikhs community. Hence question of taking consent of sikhs does not arise.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
PM never consulted Sikhs on N-deal: SAD
by Hebbar R on Jul 12, 2008 03:02 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The PM and the Congress did not consult anyone on this subject. Unfortunately not even their most important ally the Left. Further more, the Congress has been trying to play religious card by seeking SAD support on the basis that the PM himself is a Sikh.

Whether this Deal is good for India or not will be known only after real implimentation of the deal and by then it will be too late. India would have tied itself up for perpetuity. If we later able to come out of the conditions, no one knows the price that we will be paying.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:PM never consulted Sikhs on N-deal: SAD
by Flanker MaLLUverick on Jul 12, 2008 03:19 PM  Permalink
THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS WHICH WE CAN'T DISCLOSE TO EVERYBODY REGARDING THE DEAL.FOR EXAMPLE DO WE REALLY REVEAL EVERYTHING ABOUT OUR SECURITY TO ALL COUNTRIES ...NO....SO, THIS DEAL HAS CERTAIN POINTS WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY FOR INDIA AND MAKING IT "ALL THINGS PUBLIC" COULD GIVE UNDUE PUBLICITY FOR THE DEAL.WELL, ALL THE MAJOR SCIENTIST HAS SUPPORTED THE DEAL.

DOES LEFT PARTIES HAVE KNOWLEDGE THAN THE NUCLEAR SCIENTIST OF OUR COUNTRY?

LEFT HAD CRIPPLED THE GOVERNMENT FROM DAY ONE, THIS IDIOTS NEED TO BE KICKED OUT FROM KERALA AND WEST BENGAL TO ===> CHINA..BECAUSE THEY ARE TRAITORS.

I APPEAL TO ALL MY FELLA MALLUS NOT TO VOTE FOR THIS IDIOTS IN NEXT LOK SABA ELECTION.THEY SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO KERALA BORDERS..THIS IDIOTS DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE SEATED IN PARLIAMENT...INSTEAD, OUTSIDE THE PARLIAMENT WITH A RED FLAG AND BEGGING BOWL..



   Forward   |   Report abuse
PM did not consult ..........
by A K on Jul 12, 2008 03:00 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The PM did not consult my puppies and pigeons on the nuclear issue !! Wow !! Is this democracy ??

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:PM did not consult ..........
by Rahul Sharma on Jul 12, 2008 03:33 PM  Permalink
merey Hutch waley (oops vodaphone waley)Dogie(oops pug ) sey bhi nahi poocha.
Ab woh kaha jayey, kiskoy follow karey ....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM did not consult ..........
by satyarthi on Jul 12, 2008 03:04 PM  Permalink
Except, Parliament PM is not answerable to any one individual community or political party. Unfortunately, Cons created an 'extra constitutional agency - UPA left coordination committee' to discuss the deal. The deal should have been discussed in Parliament long back. Cons avoided this for the reason best known to them.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM did not consult ..........
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 12, 2008 03:07 PM  Permalink
-
Too serious a response to AK's posting.

Allow us to enjoy some good humour. Life has as such become very stressful.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM did not consult ..........
by RAVEENDRAN on Jul 12, 2008 03:08 PM  Permalink
Are you AK.ANTONY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM did not consult ..........
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 12, 2008 06:02 PM  Permalink
-
Do I sound like AK ANTONY ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM did not consult ..........
by satyarthi on Jul 12, 2008 03:12 PM  Permalink
Well, agreed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
N Deal
by ram anand on Jul 12, 2008 02:58 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Let us be Nationalist instead of talking about caste creed and community.We should feel proud of saying that we are Indians first and then something else and not listen to people of mean thinking.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:N Deal
by Prasanta Majumdar on Jul 12, 2008 03:06 PM  Permalink
you mean to say by supporting the deal and santa singh, we call ourself American

   Forward   |   Report abuse
really shocking
by Rahul Bhatia on Jul 12, 2008 02:55 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

dat means da govt has 2 consult every 1 b4 takin ny initial step....wen da great kalam saab said dat how much imp is da N-deal ..as far as thorium future prospects are concernd da man who gave us da nuclear energy power....still v hav 2 tke care of all oder parties......this is wat know as biggest democracy of da world......wat sort of democracy is dis.....!!!!
ask abt every issue 2 every 1 coz u never know who withdraw its support 4rm da centre...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:really shocking
by All Right on Jul 12, 2008 02:59 PM  Permalink
The NDA opposition to deal stands exposed with one of their constituents advocating that we sign NPT when NDA has been harping that their opposition against the deal that it impinged on our on-going militarisation

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:really shocking
by satyarthi on Jul 12, 2008 03:02 PM  Permalink
No, this SAD was creation of a prominent leader in Congress, who later held a very high post.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:really shocking
by Cutlet Gravy on Jul 12, 2008 03:04 PM  Permalink

That's really very sad.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:really shocking
by Prasanta Majumdar on Jul 12, 2008 03:04 PM  Permalink
All right, everything is wrong with you, SAD(Amritsar) is not in NDA its SAD (Badal)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:really shocking
by Prasanta Majumdar on Jul 12, 2008 03:09 PM  Permalink
I have very much respect for Mr. Kalam as great scientist and human being. But this people don't know anything like economists. There are many things beyond science and economics.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:really shocking
by satyarthi on Jul 12, 2008 02:58 PM  Permalink
This SAD is different from SAd (badal group) ruling in Punjab.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
PM please............
by Don on Jul 12, 2008 02:54 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

PM please consult Sikhs then Tamils then Gujratis then Himachalis then Rajasthanis then Maharashtrians then Malyalis then Kannadis then Oriyas then Bengalis then Pujabis then Haryanvis and then Delhiites...perhaps then you should have approved the N-Deal

Friggin Akalis

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:PM please............
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 12, 2008 03:01 PM  Permalink
-
Then
- Chakrabartis, Chakravartys,

- Aggarwals, Aggarwals, Agarvals, Agrawals, Aggrawaals.

- Pandya, Pandia

AND DO NOT FORGET ME

"MOHANTY"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM please............
by Cutlet Gravy on Jul 12, 2008 03:06 PM  Permalink


Hey hey hey !

Can't leave out the Meenas and the Gurjars, can we !?!.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM please............
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 12, 2008 03:10 PM  Permalink
-
No way.

I am on my way to Kalahandi to collect the whole list of Santhaals tribes and sub-tribes also.

Please ask Man Mohan to wait for me.

I would be back soon before US Congress takes a break.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM please............
by Guest on Jul 12, 2008 03:29 PM  Permalink
Mr.Prabhat Mohanty, you seem to have plenty of free time like me.Any way you are doing Social Service.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PM please............
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 12, 2008 05:37 PM  Permalink
-
I am 24 hrs online.

Posting in between phone calls, client appointments, debugging, attending credit card calls.


And for entertainment I do look up to Rediff board.

By the way the biggest piece I write is always under 4/5 minutes.

Advani & Vajpayee are so inspiring !

Now Mr Mann!

Forward   |   Report abuse
This SAd is different from the SAD (Badal Group) ruling in Punjab.
by satyarthi on Jul 12, 2008 02:52 PM  Permalink 

This SAd is different from the SAD (Badal Group) ruling in Punjab.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Total 334 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >
Write a message