DURING THE NDA RULE SONIA AND CONGRESS OPPOSED AMERICANS, SHE OPPOSED THE KARGIL WAR, SHE OPPOSED GLOBALISATION AND TRADE AGREEMENTS WITH AMERICANS..SHE AND HER PARTY WAS A MORE LEFT THAN THE LEFT..FOR THE CAUSE OF SUICIDE COMMITTING FARMERS....FOR THE CAUSE OF POOR PEOPLE (OF COURSE NOW EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT WAS A SHAM)....NOW SUDDENLY BOTH THEM HAVE TAKEN A SOMERSAULT AND ARE SITTING IN AMERICA'S LAP. WHAT A CHANGE....BUT WHY DOES EVERY PARTY COMING TO POWER SITS IN AMERICA'S LAP AND WHEN OUTSIDE THROWS ABUSES AT AMERICA?
RE:UPA paid a lot to Karat-gang for four years...Now Cong ditched expensive commis gang.
by Jitendra Kumar on Jul 11, 2008 03:49 PM Permalink
Unfortunatly you did not get anything. Just counting
RE:UPA paid a lot to Karat-gang for four years...Now Cong ditched expensive commis gang.
by Ram Sharma on Jul 11, 2008 03:54 PM Permalink
No, Mulayam - Amar jodi is not foolish. CBI will now go slow against Mulayam regarding disproportionate assets case.
I invite your attention to ARTICLE 103 of safeguards agreement. Even for minor non-compliance from part of India with the safeguards agreement, IAEA can report to Security Council to take military action against India. Please read the article given below.
"103. If the Board determines in accordance with Article XII.C of the Statute of the Agency that there has been any non-compliance by India with this Agreement, the Board shall call upon India to remedy such non-compliance forthwith, and shall make such reports as it deems appropriate. In the event of failure by India to take full remedial action within a reasonable time, the Board may take any other measures provided for in Article XII.C of the Statute."
“To make such reports as it deems fit” - is the UN language for saying "report for military action to security council".
This article 103 must be corrected to the effect that in case of non-compliance, IAEA can decide to stop or reduce further supply of nuclear material for a definite or indefinite term and the decision to be reviewed annually by IAEA.
Why? We know last year IAEA nearly recommended military action against Iran, It is a political body and if in future Indo US relation becomes bad, US can do this kind of things.
Saddam was once best friend of US (like India now) and finally US captured Saddam and was hanged “Live Telecast”. So relations can go sour anytime and we mush be careful.
INDIA act to avoid risking Security Coucil decison
RE:BJP: CONGLOMARATE OF STUPID ILLETERATE PEOPLE
by Ram Sharma on Jul 11, 2008 03:51 PM Permalink
Except BJP, JD(U) & Left, all other parties r controlled by either a single person (Mulayam, Navin Patnaik, Paswan, Sharad Pawar, Jaylalitha, Mayawati, Mamata Banerjee, Ajit Singh, Raj Thakre etc) or by a dynasty (Sonia Parivar, Karunanidhi Parivar, Lalu Parivar, Badal Parivar, Farookh Abdullah Parivar, Bala Thakre Parivar etc).
These r the most undemocratic and opportunistic parties of the country, as their decisions r influenced by the whims of the person or a member of the dynasty.
RE:RE:BJP: CONGLOMARATE OF STUPID ILLETERATE PEOPLE
by vinit trivedi on Jul 11, 2008 05:02 PM Permalink
ae shane jyada bol mat woh nahin hote to hindus minority mein aa jate
The Article 103 of the safegaurd agreement with IAEA could help US to mount pressure on India to sign CTBT in the event of any non- compliance on the part of india, if reported by the inspection agency
SONIA AND CONGRESS OPPOSED AMERICANS, SHE OPPOSED THE KARGIL WAR, SHE OPPOSED GLOBALISATION AND TRADE AGREEMENTS WITH AMERICANS....NOW SUDDENLY BOTH THEM HAVE TAKEN A SOMERSAULT AND ARE SITTING IN AMERICA'S LAP.
The Indo-US nuclear deal is facing criticism not only in India but also in the US. A senior Democratic lawmaker Ed Markey has slammed the safeguards agreement as pathetic.
Markey says the India-IAEA safeguards agreement is worse than useless; it is a sham.
Markey is a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the founder and co-chair of the House Bipartisan Task Force on Nonproliferation.
He has been opposing the nuclear deal from the very beginning.
''It should ensure a bright red line between civilian and military nuclear facilities. Instead, it lays out a path for India to unilaterally remove international safeguards from reactors,'' he said.
He adds that ''Contrary to everything the Bush administration has claimed, if this safeguards agreement is approved, India will be allowed to make electricity one day and bombs the next.''
''This pathetic safeguards agreement not only seriously undermines the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but it also sends the exact wrong message to Iran: that international nuclear safeguards are only for show. With this agreement, the IAEA has thrown its principles out the window and has abandoned its most important responsibilities,'' he said.
No it will not...it is full of oppertunists exploiting the psyche of indians from the days of freedom struggle....they are corrupt ,incapable and minority/reservation licking....... exploiters...Earlier they go out better for india...yes any good govt will have to work hard ...but i am sure we have good alternatives....
There is nothing to worry or speculate about the continuance of UPA goverment. The nuclear deal with US would be clinched. No party of the UPA wants early elections as general elections are not very far off. As it always happens, when some bodies hut is burning others would like to light a cigerette in stead of rescuing the hut from the fire. This attitude is nothing new for opportunistic politicians who would like to encash to fatten their purses by black mailing the UPA set up.They are in no way bothered about the country's integrity and sovereignity.
90s - BJP opposed economic reforms before that - BJP opposed computer, IT, telecom 2005 - BJP opposed patent bill (the same bill was drafted by them while in power!) IT TELECOM HAS GENERATED SO MANY THINGS ITS CONG ACHIEVEMENT-DO U NOT FEEL?BJP- CONSERVATIVE THEIR EYES/BRAINS R NOT OPEN YET-THIS IS A PITY.
RE:BJP------------------------KE DIN YAAD KARO KYA KIYA THA
by Rakesh Sharma on Jul 11, 2008 03:39 PM Permalink
SONIA AND CONGRESS OPPOSED AMERICANS, SHE OPPOSED THE KARGIL WAR, SHE OPPOSED GLOBALISATION AND TRADE AGREEMENTS WITH AMERICANS....NOW SUDDENLY BOTH THEM HAVE TAKEN A SOMERSAULT AND ARE SITTING IN AMERICA'S LAP.
RE:BJP------------------------KE DIN YAAD KARO KYA KIYA THA
by Vikas on Jul 11, 2008 03:39 PM Permalink
bullsh1t. bjp never opposed computer, IT, telecom. It was CPM who opposed it.
RE:BJP------------------------KE DIN YAAD KARO KYA KIYA THA
by hmm on Jul 11, 2008 03:50 PM Permalink
fool u r joking i think, the paper was with bjp govt. n bjp sat over it upto their exit from govt.
RE:BJP------------------------KE DIN YAAD KARO KYA KIYA THA
by Sathish N on Jul 11, 2008 04:01 PM Permalink
You must be reading some Italian newspaper.
