I support BJP and hence I support the Nuclear Deal because BJP has initiated the Deal. I do not support BJP in not supporting the Deal because I will have to support the Deal if BJP comes back in power and supports the Deal. So better I support the Deal now itself and continue with my stand. Long Live BJP..
If you get one great man in power he will do miracles with all the petty selfish foxes barking around him. Well done MMS. MMS coupled with APJ Abdul Kalam would have been an unbeatable combination for the cpuntry.
safeguards agreement is not good. We will not be able to use Uranium supplied to make nuke bombs.... This clause should be removed... We should get right to test anytime,anywhere and should be free to use fuel at our will....
RE:safeguards agreement is not good
by SI on Jul 10, 2008 10:31 AM Permalink
hey! noone is going to sell you uranium to make bombs! If that was the case, we could have asked for bombs, not uranium, to save time and energy! hahaha. The uranium we have in our country can be used to make bombs, thats one benifit of the deal.
RE:safeguards agreement is not good
by Activist on Jul 10, 2008 10:41 AM Permalink
darling, uranium has to be enriched to make bombs. now we dont even have enough uranium for the existing plants. if the deal materialises, we will get more uranium.. then we can think about bombs.. ;)
RE:Text of Safeguard Agreement in rediff
by USamanta on Jul 10, 2008 10:27 AM Permalink
Congress Party repeatedly declared (till now) the full text of the agreement can not be made public. Congress Party is hiding the fact and playing dangerous game on National security and sovereignty.
RE:Text of Safeguard Agreement in rediff
by Activist on Jul 10, 2008 10:43 AM Permalink
have all the deals signed between countries made public ever by any country? whtz t obsession with making it public??? is t public more knwoledgable than the experts working on the deal?
RE:Text of Safeguard Agreement in rediff
by soorma on Jul 10, 2008 10:26 AM Permalink
safeguards agreement is not good. We will not be able to use Uranium supplied to make nuke bombs.... This clause should be removed... We should get right to test anytime,anywhere and should be free to use fuel at our will....
RE:Text of Safeguard Agreement in rediff
by All Right on Jul 10, 2008 10:59 AM Permalink
Dude. We t make bombs using uranium supplied through the deal. The deal is as its title - Indo-US Civilian Nuclear Agreement. It is not meant to make bombs.
India has 22 reactors, out of which we selected 14 reactors to be part of this deal. This means what we do with the other 8 reactors is none of the business of either the US or the IAEA. So our bomb program continues unfettered. We get extra power generation from the 14 we put under the deal.
So where is the problem.
Where in the IAEA or the 123 Agreement does it indicate that we have foregone our rights to test. Please cite the relevant clause or clauses.
If you can't, I resume you haven't really read these documents and simply blabbering
Well only time will tell us whether this deal will be fruitful one for our country.There are still other options on the table which our scientist are looking forward to.At the moment we are just focusing on the IAEA and NSG agreement.Time will give us more information as to where we can use our resources so that we generate electricity via friendly environment.We still have the options of using wind energy and solar energy both are eco-friendly. I think by going forward with this agreement we will secure our place at least when needful of shortages. At this point this deal will be beneficial to us.Still there is lot of confusion with the go ahead on the deal.Lets wait and watch.......
I wrote a lot of blogs; but it could not open MMS eyes. He was a blind because George Bush. India is starving, but 100 billion dollar defense pact with US. That is the reason Left withdrew support and will vote in the place of poor Indian.
RE:I wrote a lot of blogs; but it could not open MMS eyes. He was a blind because George Bush. India is starving, but 100 billion dollar defense pact with US. That is the reason Left withdrew support and will vote in the place of poor Indian.
by Activist on Jul 10, 2008 10:44 AM Permalink
Left are always pro-poor. thats why they killed all those rich people in Nandigram and Singur and Kannur..
RE:I wrote a lot of blogs; but it could not open MMS eyes. He was a blind because George Bush. India is starving, but 100 billion dollar defense pact with US. That is the reason Left withdrew support and will vote in the place of poor Indian.
by SANJEEV SRIVASTAVA on Jul 10, 2008 10:48 AM Permalink
SIT back and think where u are in 60 years with this HUGE of population, leg pulling politics, democracy , free press etc .... See Pakistan... we are the best man power country in the word and now each and every one in coming to us for JV and business tie ups. Pl. recall 10years back finance from bank means celebration in house (and a bit under table to bank officer) now... It’s at door step... Roads, infrastructure and education at its peak. What else you want boss. Left says " chalbo na chjalbo na" what is this!!! Even today they (left) believe in strikes and neither working nor allowing any one to work... So how could we young generations support them. MMS is not a politician he is an economist and has proofed his capabilities earlier also... Friends i request u to support him and make the nation ahead of all... Remember you can play only when you are in ground ... from out side you can only clap...clap and clap... let's be in the field and win the game. Regards,
RE:I wrote a lot of blogs; but it could not open MMS eyes. He was a blind because George Bush. India is starving, but 100 billion dollar defense pact with US. That is the reason Left withdrew support and will vote in the place of poor Indian.
by SUDHAKAR on Jul 10, 2008 10:27 AM Permalink
Yoy might have written "RUBBISH" as Commis do speak
RE:Lets convince MMS
by Vikram on Jul 10, 2008 10:15 AM Permalink
do you want energy or ram temple. Advani should start a rathyatra for solar, wind and other renewable sources of energy. That can give good motivation for Indian development.
India would require 500-600 thousand MW of power by 2030 up from 132,110 at present. Thus nuclear power is the only way forward for India. Energy needs of India are increasing exponentially and only nuclear power is the way forward. Increased price of oil and gas internationally, issues of climate change associated with coal as well as the breakdown of consensus on big dams, India needs Nuclear Energy. India generates 132,110 lakh MW of power annually. Of this, 64.7 per cent is generated from thermal power, 26.2 per cent is generated through hydro electric power, 5.9 per cent is from renewable power sources and only 3.1 per cent through nuclear power.Nuclear power would contribute 10 per cent of the country's energy needs by the year 2022 and 26 per cent of the needs by the year 2052. Share of nuclear power in world wide energy production was one per cent in 1960 and between 1960 to 1986, it rose to 16 per cent of world's energy production. The share has remained constant since then.There are 439 nuclear power reactors operating around the world and the US accounts for 104 of these reactors followed by France at 59, Japan at 55, Russian Federation 31 and Republic of Korea 20. Out of the 35 new nuclear power plants under construction in the world, Asia accounts for 24 of these. While China is building six new nuclear power plants to get 5,222 MW power for its grid, India too is building six such plants which would add 2910 MW of to its grid.
RE:India would require 500-600 thousand MW of power by 2030 up from 132,110 at present.
by naresh pant on Jul 10, 2008 10:33 AM Permalink
all of us should understand this fact. this deal is very good for us.
RE:India would require 500-600 thousand MW of power by 2030 up from 132,110 at present.
by a h s on Jul 10, 2008 11:03 AM Permalink
Similar emphasis should be given for solar and other energy sources. As these will not have a problem of waste also.
RE:India would require 500-600 thousand MW of power by 2030 up from 132,110 at present.
by jaison mulerickal on Jul 10, 2008 10:16 AM Permalink
Thank you very much for the post. I already saved it.. Very informative
RE:India would require 500-600 thousand MW of power by 2030 up from 132,110 at present.
by pravin on Jul 10, 2008 10:27 AM Permalink
we people like you in the forum, who can present facts and statistics. Good one. I hope, everybody can do similar analysis, before they vote. whichever party they might want to support, but if they can apply thought, before voting, it will be a great benefit to our country.
Do you believe congress that it will work for the benefit of country?The party who have divided Indian for the sake of power , and we have faced so many times riots in the name of casteism and religion.
Actually they want people's sympathy in the name of nuclear deal, because during last 4 years their government is totally failed in almost all the fronts economic indicator showing fall in every front, inflation is going up and up. nothing is in their control. For their failure they want to give blame to Leftists. 4 years they constituted only Committees and nothing has been implemeted. They talk about country's benefit(so called Rahstra Hit). I dont agree with them, there must be something in their mind, they dont do anything for coutry's benefit, they do everything for their own benefit.
I would like to have comments of all of you on this.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by shyam ayachit on Jul 10, 2008 10:26 AM Permalink
hi first i want to say that india is not democratic
country becaue indian voters are fools thay cant give vlear mendate to any one party
if b j p or any other party come to powar same thing will be repeated all the elected mps are either gangster or pro amrican pro china they dont see our own interest if it is possible they will sell our country no one can do anythying so stop worring
RE:RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by Activist on Jul 10, 2008 10:50 AM Permalink
why dnt u contest in election then? we will vote for u.. :D
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by Activist on Jul 10, 2008 10:49 AM Permalink
who else to believe in? the Left who cannot see beyond China or BJP, who is also playing the same silly politics which congress does? Its better to have a Prime Minister thinking about a nuclear deal with US than one thinking about Rath Yatra.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by pravin on Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM Permalink
Congress has done well to manage our economy and country as whole. But for Congress, it would have been disastorous, if BJP was in power. If somebody is blinded by their hate towards Congress, they cant see the overall development, what Congress has brought to country...
RE:RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by sabkelagade on Jul 10, 2008 10:24 AM Permalink
Inflation rate has passed 11 and you talking the congress has managed economy well. LOL, are you deff,dumb, and blind, Do you ever listen to news or go to market to see the hiked prices of comodities.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by patriotsunite on Jul 10, 2008 10:47 AM Permalink
u idiot. the economy doing bad is not because of the current govt. all countries in the world (except mebbe oil producing countries) are going through a tough time. plz listen to international news also.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by pravin on Jul 10, 2008 10:44 AM Permalink
Your language confirms , what you are. Do a relative comparison of inflation rates across the countries around the world, and compare with that of inflation rate in India.You will understand, how well Dr.Singh and team have managed it...Calling you fool might be an very generous term...
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by Ram Sharma on Jul 10, 2008 02:15 PM Permalink
Inflation in developed countries is around 3%.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by Job KK on Jul 10, 2008 10:09 AM Permalink
Who ruled India for the benefit of our Country?
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by Onlooker on Jul 10, 2008 10:10 AM Permalink
Any day! Sonia is not the double speak Vajpayee, Advani type. You can count on.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by sabkelagade on Jul 10, 2008 10:20 AM Permalink
Bull sh it sonia is just good for nothing, the lady who didn't took India's citizenship for 13 years after her marriage, still can't speak properly any of our Indian languages.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by Onlooker on Jul 10, 2008 10:31 AM Permalink
Correct. Also once she didn't want Rajiv to enter into politics because of the sycophants. This is a plus for Sonia. She is not making any hasty decisions after all she is moving in to India you know. Now it is a different story I am talking about years back when Sonia had to make that decision. You could say it was a sacrifice for her husband.
RE:RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by pravin on Jul 10, 2008 10:18 AM Permalink
I agree. Any day team of Dr.Singh and Sonia is better than all these crooks(Advani,Modi & gang)
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by raj on Jul 10, 2008 10:11 AM Permalink
Why i believe you. First Give example of any one good work which you have done for your country in your whole life.
RE:RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by sabkelagade on Jul 10, 2008 10:22 AM Permalink
abe to tune kya kiya hai. at least he creating awareness, not a lazy person like you, who can't do anything nor want the others to do.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by Job KK on Jul 10, 2008 10:14 AM Permalink
I replied your stupid question. That is the best thing that I done in my whole life.
RE:I am asking question from each of you , Do you believe Congress?
by JISHNU KHOSLA on Jul 10, 2008 10:24 AM Permalink
fantastic, "maza aa gaya" This is answer he deserve.
Netaji used to say that if the British newspaper praise us for something, we should become careful and see if we r on the right path.
Now Bush, who has being strong pressing India to sign the during his rule, is praising MMS as a strong and good leader. We all know how 'strong' MMS is, as he does not hv any power, all power is in the hands of Sonia Parivar. We also know that this deal is definitely very good for the nuclear business lobby of USA, who will sell its equipment at exhorbitant prices to us. Hence we should be careful in signing the deal.
We should not sign the deal unless Hyde act is made redudant for our deal.
RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by pravin on Jul 10, 2008 10:21 AM Permalink
I agree, if BJP cant think of any issues other than Mandir/Masjid
RE:RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by Ram Sharma on Jul 10, 2008 10:35 AM Permalink
Moreover during NDA rule, Mandir was not at all an issue.
RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by pravin on Jul 10, 2008 11:01 AM Permalink
Thats exactly the issue, they take up Mandir/Masjid issue only during elections, not when they were in power, this shows that, they can do anything for power, inlcuding inciting the communal sentiments...this is what is disastrous..why are they again talking of RathYatra,RamMandir etc..
RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by Ram Sharma on Jul 10, 2008 02:18 PM Permalink
It was bcz of coalition govt that they dropped all their pet programs. Do u think that if BJP had been in power, they would not hv gone for uniform civil code (which even SC has supported) and other pet issues.
RE:RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by Ram Sharma on Jul 10, 2008 10:32 AM Permalink
Who started Pradham Mantri Sadak Yojana? Who thought about joining the country's rivers?
RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by Ram Sharma on Jul 10, 2008 10:31 AM Permalink
Why do u think that BJP is not Indian? For Congress u can say so due to Italian Sonia, who did not apply for Indian citizenship for many yrs after marrying Rajiv.
RE:RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by pravin on Jul 10, 2008 11:03 AM Permalink
Bullshit, she has married Indian and she is Indian. if the origin is question, Advani was born in Pakistan, then he should be Paki right? Then is more dangerous than Italian.
RE:RE:RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by Ram Sharma on Jul 10, 2008 02:25 PM Permalink
By saying 'bullshit' how can u deny the fact that she was born in Italy to Italian parents (her father was in the army of Musolini) and that she did not apply for Indian citizenship for 13 yrs. U cannot compare the case of Sonia, Advani, Mussaraf, MMS etc. They were born in undivided India before independence. It is a historical fact, which u cannot deny by just saying 'bullshit'. According to u anybody born in Pakistan part in pre independence era r more dangerous, which is rediculous. On that basis not only Advani, yr MMS also becomes more dangerous. But this type of argument is 'bull....'. Instead of writing 'bull....', u should give proper argument.
RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by SI on Jul 10, 2008 10:12 AM Permalink
Why should any country enter into a deal without any benifit for them? US also will have benifits,why should we be worried if they get some benifits? All you need to think is if it is good for us. Hyde act is binding on US, not on India. If the deal is so benificial to them, why we have to worry about them cancelling the deal?
RE:RE:Beware Bush is praising MMS, b careful
by Ram Sharma on Jul 10, 2008 10:33 AM Permalink
U r wrong in saying that Hyde act is not binding on us. Long ago many US officers hv clarified it after Pranab said what u r saying.
