If he wants to go to Mayawati, he should state it that way, and not show indian muslims in bad light by putting it ahead of India. He again is like the left, who puts his idealogy ahead of national intrest. No place for leader like you within India. No vote for you from Indian muslims.
RE:He is the biggest threat to Indian Muslims
by Hell Boy on Jul 09, 2008 08:41 PM Permalink
Exactly see where thsese ploiticians are going to get their vote bank, now he is stating that Muslims hate America i think he should be talking for himself rather then talking for their community. This politicians are nuts and they also think that all the people of India are nuts just because we trusted them and voted into power.
If he wants to go to Mayawati, he should state it that way, and not show indian muslims in bad light by putting it ahead of India. He again is like the left, who puts his idealogy ahead of national intrest. No place for leader like you within India. No vote for you from Indian muslims.
There are nearly 52 Muslim countries. Show one Muslim country which provides Haj subsidy.
Show one Muslim country, which has a Non-Muslim as its President or Prime Minister.
Hindu-majority Maharashtra, Bihar, Kerala, Pondicherry , etc. have in the past elected Muslims as CM’s, ….. Can you ever imagine a Hindu becoming the CM of Muslim - majority J&K?
When Haj pilgrims are given subsidy, why Hindu pilgrims to Amarnath, Sabarimalai & Kailash Mansarovar are taxed?
Why post - Godhra is blown out of proportion, when no-one talks of the ethnic cleansing of 4 lakh Hindus from Kashmir?
Abdul Rehman Antuley was made a trustee of the famous Siddhi Vinayak Temple in Prabhadevi, Mumbai ….Can a Hindu - say Mulayam or Laloo – ever become a trustee of a Masjid or Madrasa?
RE:VHP is communal and Muslim league is Secular????????
by Ajay Singh on Jul 09, 2008 08:34 PM Permalink
Khata hai yahan kee Gata hai wahan ke....he is a mental,
RE:VHP is communal and Muslim league is Secular????????
by atanu on Jul 09, 2008 08:32 PM Permalink
muslims dont have the answers to such tricky questions.
RE:VHP is communal and Muslim league is Secular????????
by mahabodhi on Jul 09, 2008 09:17 PM Permalink
@umesh anant as far as Haj subsidy is concerned why BJP during its rule did not terminated it !this is question which BJP should answer !and as for Haj subsidy many muslims hv stated including syed shibuudin ex-diplomat and once favorite of atal Behari Vajpayee -that muslims do not need HaJ SUBSIDY !But still BJP continues to givr Haj subsidy !why !The reasons cited by syed shibbuddin were that Haj subsidy is on Air India ticket only and amounts to Rs. 12000/- per person only !where as ticket is highly overcharged that is it is Rs.34000/-!It was also said that many operators r giving Haj tour for Rs.66000/- ! so as per muslims Syed shibbuddin and others also the Haj subsidy is basically for generating revenues for Air India ! Which gebrates more revenue on Haj subsidy accounts !As per muslims it charges Rs.34000/- per ticket and subsidy is for Rs.12000/- nly !That is ticket is Rs.24000/- which to many seems very high! Most muslims r against Haj subsidy as syed shibuddin once said 1So muslims in this forum should throw light on this contentionous issue as this is giving BJP supporters -(Which also never cancelled Haj subsidy during their rule - Why -for muslim appeasment !) ! I will prefer if muslims in this forum throw light on this haj subsidy !
RE:VHP is communal and Muslim league is Secular????????
by Braveheart on Jul 09, 2008 08:34 PM Permalink
For the past 365 days..I am reading the same post from U...Dude,Im bored...do write something else..apart from copy paste...it seems u have maintained a wordfile..whenevr u wanna write ..just copy n paste it here!!!
RE:VHP is communal and Muslim league is Secular????????
by All Right on Jul 09, 2008 08:36 PM Permalink
VHP is communal and Muslim league is Secular????????
It certainly looks like that with Muslim League voting for a "anti-Muslim" agreement and the BJP/VHP voting against it.
This development is one big embarrassment for the BJP
Great ! Now we have an MP who says he opposes the deal because of his religion. Does that mean that he would have supported the deal were he to be a non-Muslim?
There is no mention about the deal's negative impact on India. Just his religion. And this man is an elected representative of his people. He is unfit to be an MP. No one need to wonder as to why we always lag behind in everything, with such backward and negative thinking people in our country.
Thats simply put a great politics. Thats the power of democracy. I am really admire the courage and personality who defy the orders of their big bosses Singh and Yadav. Great going.
BJP is just showing that they are honest for the betterment of India. They should show desh-bhakti coming along with congress for N-deal. Why they are against it.....They dont think about india....they think about thier benfit...
RE:BJP shuld join cogress for N-deal
by mahesh on Jul 09, 2008 08:32 PM Permalink
that is right even brijesh mishra support this deal they are playing politics in this matter n the will regret it
RE:BJP shuld join cogress for N-deal
by RAVINDRA BHOSALE on Jul 09, 2008 08:39 PM Permalink
BJP is the opportunist copy of Congress. For the power they can do any thing. The deal was started by their double standard leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee who always have DHOLAk in his hand and he was beating any of the side of Dholak which is favourable to keep his power. He had made crores of Rupees adjustment with Samta,Mamta,Jailalita,Babu and Badal. Who have looted India. Mr.George Fernandes was once time socialist and anti american became Vajpayees Ambesdor and earn lot of money. Now both have poor health which is good for our counntry. We cant expect any positive signal from BJP for nation unless and until it give power to them. BJP has not delivered its role of opposition in Loksabha. It is our fortune that the outside supporter leftists have played role of opposition and govt. got real opposition party from yesterday.
RE:RE:BJP shuld join cogress for N-deal
by mahesh on Jul 09, 2008 08:32 PM Permalink
that is right even brijesh mishra support this deal they are playing politics in this matter n the will regret it
India never supported or sent army to help American cause in Iraq. But at the same time one should keep in mind that countries like Saudi Arabia are great friends of America. So why one should think that Nuke deal with America is something against Islam? All Indians should consider the interest of India first irrespective of their religion or petty politics.
RE:Nuke deal is for India
by sangeeth on Jul 09, 2008 08:31 PM Permalink
how come saudi Arabia into picture . if saudi accepts america r u saying that all muslims also should accept US.ur view must change better.
Forget all the brouhaha over the electricity generation, nuclear trade, etc.
Why parties support and oppose the deal? 1. Communists opposing reason- is their ideology of anti-Americanism (not China). 2. BJP opposing reason-Nationalism and national sovereignty. 3. US proposing reason- to cap our nuclear capability. 4. Congress agreeing reason - big money in Swiss banks (don't forget Swiss Frank 2.5 billion in Rajiv's account in Swiss banks from Bofors, now controlled by Sonia and her childrens) and more once trade starts.
The deal is a Trojan Horse designed to destroy our strategic capabilities. We must disapprove Indo-US nuclear pact in its present form, since it is detrimental to national interest.
RE:Why Parties Oppose and Support the n-Deal?
by Prakash Asrani on Jul 09, 2008 08:33 PM Permalink
What more you can expect from Knickerwalas' apologists? BJP opposing for reasons of nationalism- and promising to renegotiate after coming to power (in 2100?). Mungerilal's dreams likely to turn into nightmares soon. 82 year old budhavoo trying to act smart. No wonder his mission to beg for PM' chair through Jaswant Singh prostrating at the feet of Mulayam Singh failed twice. No shame for this indecent hurry for a chair? Kissa Kursi Ka?
His statement says he hates US and US will bomb Muslims. He is an MP in India. What about India. No mention on whether the deal is good or bad for India. US has not bombed any muslim in India. Why do we elect such people? His first priority should be India and Indian Muslims. Why is the press not asking these questions?