RE:Congress government real opportunists ...
by p on Jul 08, 2008 07:31 PM Permalink
Crap. Left could have joined the govt anytime they wanted. They just wanted to be outside just for the reason that they did not want ANY RESPONSIBILITY or ACCOUNTABILITY.
1942- commies ditched india during quit india moovement
1956- criticised nehru for independent foreign policy and not joining soviet led alignment.
1962- mute on chinese aggression
1974- nuke test..against peace..this was their argument when their fellow comrades were sharing weapons technology with china.
1978- huge support for NAM against earlier disapproval at a time when it became worthless.
1991- opposed economic reforms when we were at a critical stage
2006- didnt say anything when arunachal was claimed by china
2008- finger area aggression by china- commies were quiet.
THEY WILL DO ANYTHING IN THEIR CAPACITY TO BE TREACHEROUS BECAUSE OF THEIR UNIQUE ANTI-NATIONAL GENETIC MAKE UP. ITS TIME THAT ALL PARTIES IGNORE THE COMMIES AND FACILITATE THE DEMISE OF THE MOST ATROCIOUS IDEOLOGY ON EARTH- COMMUNISM
RE:why congress white skin dont want kafir pagan brown skin indian to read full text ? what is white skin congress hiding fro brown skin indians ?
by Anil on Jul 08, 2008 06:28 PM Permalink
This is our nation and the Indian public. Nobody knows anything about the deal but many people and political parties are blindly supporting it. The congress concealing the Deal from the public as well as from their own alliance, forget about opposition. There are 123 hide rules. What are the hide rules? Even if anybody beat his mother the public will split into two side i.e. somebody will support it and somebody will against it.
RE:why congress white skin dont want kafir pagan brown skin indian to read full text ? what is white skin congress hiding fro brown skin indians ?
by nadeem quraishi on Jul 08, 2008 06:34 PM Permalink
terrorist jihadi naxal communist????
They are inhumane because they dislike the concept of liberty itself.example(s) SINGUR
TIBET
NANDIGRAM
TIANAMEN SQUARE
CRUSHING OF HUNGARY
HISTORY OF LENIN,STALIN AND OTHER COMMIES WHO KILLED MORE LIVES THAN HITLER.
We can simply not allow the most wicked ideology to thrive in our wonderful Nation which cherishes democratic values.see what they have done to the govt for the past 4 years.under the garb of workers rights who comprise 2% of the population they didnt allow any progressive policy to have its light.they are anti-national anti-development and anti-human.
RE:why comminism is the greatest evil
by Anil on Jul 08, 2008 06:38 PM Permalink
You all are unnecessary wasting your time without any knowledge because you peoples knowledge and culture are reflecting in your messages and your replies.
RE:why comminism is the greatest evil
by SahadevenKK SahadevanKK on Jul 08, 2008 06:17 PM Permalink
Communists beleive in Class war. we will eliminate the enemies. better join red force or face extinction
RE:why comminism is the greatest evil
by somen chatterjee on Jul 08, 2008 06:30 PM Permalink
SINGUR : MULTINATIONAL FINANCED DEMONSTRATION SUCH AS MARUTI, HUNDAI, NANDIGRAM : KILLING POLICE MAN , CUTTING ROAD INACCESSABLE SITUATION IS NOT A DEMOCRATIC WORK.WHAT ABOUT GUJJAR AT RAJASTHAN CRUSING OF HUNGRY : CONGRESS LED GOVERNMENT IS THE BEST EXAMPLE.LATEST ADDITION ANDHRA PRADESH PLEASE SEE HISTORY OF INDIRA GANDHI : GOLDEN TEMPLE MASSACARE RAJIB GANDHI : ROLE IN SIKH KILLING AFTER INDIRA DEAD
So for i am for the deal. Now it is better the deal is set aside. What is there to hide in any agreement?. I don't find any confidentiality in any high level agreements between governments. People should know. Is there any secret about how to make atom bomb and destroy the world?. Are there any password that can be used to hack the nuclear power plant computer network? can any one say what may be the sensitive content.
RE:Better the deal may put off
by binu tk on Jul 08, 2008 06:28 PM Permalink
Though the deal is said to a civil nuclear nuclear deal it has got many complexities which our enemy countries should not know... Once if it released in daylight for the common public in india it may cause danger. I do firmly believe that if a person like Dr Abdul Kalam stands for the nuke deal we should not have any opposition on that... Mr Karat has to take another birth if he want to equalize with Dr Kalam
RE:Better the deal may put off
by Nand Gupta on Jul 08, 2008 06:33 PM Permalink
Mr Karat has to take more than a trillion birth to equalize Dr Kalam. Salute to you Dr Kalam. You are a true indian
RE:Better the deal may put off
by Dharmendra Gangrade on Jul 08, 2008 06:39 PM Permalink
You are absolutely right. How many of us know any other nuclear process or deal we had with Russia ? Did we check that ? We need power 10 times more than what we have. And only this deal can give us. Left parties do not qualify to oppose this unless they have someone like Dr Kalam supports them with Logic. --DG
RE:Better the deal may put off
by fun guy on Jul 08, 2008 06:34 PM Permalink
I am asking out of my curiosity, What like information our enemy country can do ill to the deal?. will there be any cost figure?. it will be do's and don'ts basically.
Lets hand over West bengal, Tripura, and Kerala to China, and Kashmir to Pakistan and live happily ever after. Radical surgery is needed to weed out cancerous cells. Chemotheraphy would be in the form of military dictatorship for 20 years.
