1942- commies ditched india during quit india moovement
1956- criticised nehru for independent foreign policy and not joining soviet led alignment.
1962- mute on chinese aggression
1974- nuke test..against peace..this was their argument when their fellow comrades were sharing weapons technology with china.
1978- huge support for NAM against earlier disapproval at a time when it became worthless.
1991- opposed economic reforms when we were at a critical stage
2006- didnt say anything when arunachal was claimed by china
2008- finger area aggression by china- commies were quiet.
THEY WILL DO ANYTHING IN THEIR CAPACITY TO BE TREACHEROUS BECAUSE OF THEIR UNIQUE ANTI-NATIONAL GENETIC MAKE UP. ITS TIME THAT ALL PARTIES IGNORE THE COMMIES AND FACILITATE THE DEMISE OF THE MOST ATROCIOUS IDEOLOGY ON EARTH- COMMUNISM
RE:history of treachery
by AYAN CHAKRAVARTY on Jul 08, 2008 06:03 PM Permalink
you have hit the bull's eye. I hope someone from media is reading your article and takes it up.
RE:RE:history of treachery
by PK on Jul 08, 2008 06:02 PM Permalink
So, here is the reason: THAT --- Full text can not be shared with agents of China, Pak and Russia.. (i.e. Mr. Karat & Party) and Mao_wadi Naxalites
Wherez transperancy? Oh its thousands of miles away says Congress. If full text cannot be made available, wherez the Rights to Information Act? If all clauses in the agreement is to safeguard and protect the interests of India, why cant it be shared. Congress, under the leadership of a foreigner will not dare to sell or pledge the rights of India. While we can understand that your leader is a foreigner, so nothing great can be expected from that foreigner. But, what happened to you Pranabji. You are born and brought up in India. Are you not an Indian?
RE:Pranabji - are you not an Indian?
by Nand Gupta on Jul 08, 2008 06:03 PM Permalink
does the right to information act means that you would share your credit card number and bank account user id and pwd.
RE:Pranabji - are you not an Indian?
by Kamal on Jul 08, 2008 06:07 PM Permalink
Folks, if anything that is considered as threat to the nation's security, morally its the duty of the Government to present a white paper, whether it is considerd as Rights to Information or not.
RE:Pranabji - are you not an Indian?
by Nand Gupta on Jul 08, 2008 06:17 PM Permalink
if is is considered as threat to the nation's security then only. right? how did you arrive at the conclusion that the nuclear deal is a threat to the nation? The real threats of the nation are the communists. Go and demand white paper from them
RE:Pranabji - are you not an Indian?
by JNB on Jul 08, 2008 06:02 PM Permalink
I dont think everything comes under right to information act. If you ask for the name of Indian secret agents in foreign land, do you expect that govt will give those name to you. There are something called classified documents, which anyone cannot have access.
RE:Pranab and Governement should be immediately arrested!
by srivarma shetty on Jul 08, 2008 06:06 PM Permalink
Military rule need not necessarily be a democratic rule. At least,now we have the liberty to ask for Mr Pranab's arrest. In a military rule we may get arrested for demanding the Dictators arrest. Have'nt we seen the results of military rules in our neighbourhood. Srivarma Shetty.
RE:RE:why full text cant be shown to people,,,what is congress hiding ?
by Kamal on Jul 08, 2008 05:57 PM Permalink
Congress president will be least bothered as it is not going to affect Italy in any way.
RE:why full text cant be shown to people,,,what is congress hiding ?
by Sathish N on Jul 08, 2008 05:57 PM Permalink
correction..
It is not white skin. It is bleached skin. White skin is the propaganda these guys have been promoting for quite some time. It is there inability to produce melanin.
It means there is something wrong at the bottom which hides US policy of keeping India also under its thumb. Thats why Commies or some scientists opposed it. Is not it?
RE:Full text
by ValiaKunnambath Ratnakumar on Jul 08, 2008 05:57 PM Permalink
This is abt IAEA agreement not 123 Agreement.In any agreement there is confidentiality in order to safeguard both interests
