Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 544 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
LEFT SUPPORT
by SAIBAL GUPTA on Jul 08, 2008 03:39 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

What a releif!!! We need not have to watch those ugly faces of commies in the TV all the time!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:LEFT SUPPORT
by Pankaj Sonawane on Jul 08, 2008 03:41 PM  Permalink
agree

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:LEFT SUPPORT
by Gaurav Mathur on Jul 08, 2008 03:46 PM  Permalink
haan bhai... yeh kaam to accha hua...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Congress wanted to bring these ''reforms''
by Sameer on Jul 08, 2008 03:38 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

--
8. Easier norms for foreign banks to set up operations in India

9) Removal of 10 per cent cap on voting rights for investors in non-state banks

11) Relaxation of land ceiling for foreign realty developers

12) Easier entry norms for credit rating companies

13) Higher foreign equity in asset reconstruction companies

14) Higher equity for foreign firms in state-run refining projects

15) Higher foreign equity in newspapers and current affairs periodicals

--

Bascially sell India.




    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Congress wanted to bring these ''reforms''
by Gaurav Mathur on Jul 08, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink
kya bakwaas kar rahe ho miyan...
The "reforms", as u put it, are but a viewpoint. As you might be knowing, all the bills and issues etc are put in the Lok Sabha first and the matter is debated out keeping in mind the pros and cons... Only then it is given a go ahead...
Don't say anything unless you are sure...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Congress wanted to bring these ''reforms''
by Sameer on Jul 08, 2008 03:46 PM  Permalink
These are the items on congressi agenda--anything for aam adami...basically India is on sale as per Congressis.

For example--do you know how many foreign banks there are in UK, USA? These countires don't allow any foreign bank but want India to open its banking and insurance sector..why?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Congress wanted to bring these ''reforms''
by Mohammed basheer on Jul 08, 2008 03:46 PM  Permalink
Dont be afraid of foreigners. We are better than them. We dont need to be protected from them. Openingup of sectors to foreign competition has only made indian companies competitive internationally and they are now able to compete well in even developed markets. Do you want our companies remain protected producing ambassador cars for 40 years with no innovation or do you want indian companies like Tata Motors taking on the world with innovations like nano.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:Congress wanted to bring these ''reforms''
by Sameer on Jul 08, 2008 03:47 PM  Permalink
mr..if foreign realty companies buy land in India, the prices will be out of reach even more than what we see now.

is this not a sell out?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Congress wanted to bring these ''reforms''
by Gaurav Mathur on Jul 08, 2008 03:58 PM  Permalink
even Indian Real Estate agents are doing this brother...
and as for your previous question, SBI and ICICI do have branches across the globe.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Left Pull out
by Bhuwan Tripathi on Jul 08, 2008 03:37 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is good if govt. falls. we must bring govt. with full majority be it be congress or BJP. offcourse not regional or anti development parties. we must give them full tenure to proove their worth.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Left Pull out
by IMRAN MOHAMMED on Jul 08, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink
the commies have prooooooven that they are the worst party.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Left Pull out
by Pradeep Kumar on Jul 08, 2008 03:45 PM  Permalink
Considering the present situation, no single party will get majority. So they have to go for an alliance with other regional parties. If NDA is not coming to power in next election , the situation will be same.. UPA with outside support of Left and another 4 or 5 years with the same drama...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Left Pull out
by IMRAN MOHAMMED on Jul 08, 2008 03:48 PM  Permalink
you said it

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Left Pull out
by amit koul on Jul 08, 2008 03:39 PM  Permalink
Let it be BJP not Contgress.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Left move
by bharat pahala on Jul 08, 2008 03:36 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The left is unmoved by Kabul tragedy, or any other tragedy that strikes this country. They only want to obey their masters in China and so they hide behind arguments to bring this country to doom. Too sad the educated people of Kerala and Bengal have not seen through their game

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Left move
by MADHUKUMAR PARAMESWARAN on Jul 08, 2008 03:48 PM  Permalink
Left parties shows that even today there are some peoples alive in india who work for principles.
Left parties never bargained for any ministerial berths.They stand with their principles

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Left move
by Mohammed basheer on Jul 08, 2008 03:53 PM  Permalink
THey keeps their principles and do nothing. They didn't bargain because they dont want to get their hands dirty. THey are not ready to work for the country and will not let anybody work for countries progress. IS there any country in the world that has progressed using communist 'principles'? All former communist countries started progressing only after they shed the principles.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Left move
by FastenKP on Jul 08, 2008 04:06 PM  Permalink
what u mean by development???? creating some billionairs?? what abt majority of common people, they need food and basic ammenities and not nuclear...... i know nobody will support me because in this country 40% people never touch a computer....... they don't know how to write their name....... Lefts are sanding for that common people....... they are not oppertunits like Sp or BJP

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Left move
by ramu on Jul 08, 2008 03:39 PM  Permalink
The main aim of Left parties was to stall the development process of India against China.In this plan they have succeeded.Now reforms have stopped,Inflation high,GDP down etc etc

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Left move
by Mohammed basheer on Jul 08, 2008 03:49 PM  Permalink
Kerala and Bengal people had no option but to vote for left or a fractured opposition. BJP leadership should changed in these 2 states where they have made no progress with high infighting. We need somebody like Yediyurappa in Kerala to eliminate left from india once and for all.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Left move
by FastenKP on Jul 08, 2008 03:58 PM  Permalink
waite man.......kannadigas will throw out yadiyurappa. mallus are not fanetics and narrow minded like u people

   Forward   |   Report abuse
cost of nuclear plant- plan to bankrupt India
by Sameer on Jul 08, 2008 03:29 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

--
The Government has vastly underestimated the cost of building a new generation of nuclear power plants, according to the head of the world's largest power company.

Wulf Bernotat, chairman and chief executive of E.ON, the German energy giant that owns Powergen, has told The Times that the cost per plant could be as high as €6 billion (�4.8 billion) - nearly double the Government's latest �2.8 billion estimate.

His figures indicate that the cost of replacing Britain's ten nuclear power stations could reach �48 billion, excluding the cost of decommissioning ageing reactors or dealing with nuclear waste. “We are talking easily about €5 billion to €6 billion [each],” Dr Bernotat said.

--

One euro is 70 rupees. Ciost of one plant 42,000 crores. Indian labor is cheap but sonce India will be importing the parts, cheap labor cost will be compensated by expensive imports. ---

Link
//business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/utilities/article3872870.ece

prefix ach tee tee pee

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:cost of nuclear plant- plan to bankrupt India
by Mohammed basheer on Jul 08, 2008 03:57 PM  Permalink
We dont need to build new plants to use the Uranium from the Ndeal. We have the existing ones rotting without uranium. with no additional investment te power output can be increased by 40% with the N-deal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:cost of nuclear plant- plan to bankrupt India
by Rajesh Kumar on Jul 08, 2008 04:09 PM  Permalink
u have to c the cost to benefit ratio...nuclear power is clean and immense. no more power dependency and cuts in the cities

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:cost of nuclear plant- plan to bankrupt India
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 08, 2008 03:47 PM  Permalink
-
If the cost becomes prohibitive, India can decide not to implement the Nuclear Power Projects.

Nobody would stop India from doing so.

123 agreement is not about how many nuclear power plant India must have.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Left is harmful
by Abhishek on Jul 08, 2008 03:22 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The laft parties are out to hurt the Indian economy. They lived their lives like bhikaris and want us also to live as a bhikhari. See the two states they ruled Bengal and Kerala, there is no development at all in these states. You are right they are agents of China who are working against India. They must be thrown into the Arabian sea forever.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Left is harmful
by ramu on Jul 08, 2008 03:32 PM  Permalink
The main aim of Left parties was to stall the development process of India against China.In this plan they have succeeded.Now reforms have stopped,Inflation high,GDP down etc etc

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Left is harmful
by Kaushik Dev on Jul 08, 2008 03:28 PM  Permalink
The great educated economist has already spoiled Indin economy. what else is left? Laloo is better than him. He did some development in Railways

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 544 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message