After making a lot of atomic reacters if NSG countries stop the supply of fuel on the INFLUENCE OF UNITED STAES for supporting their forgien policy like support the attack on iran etc india,s independendant forieghn policy will be compromised .Because of that the govt is not disclosing the details of the terms of the agrement to public.The implication of the deal with america is COMPRIMISE on india's independant forgien policy .THAT IS WHY US is showing more interest than india.Moreover ameriacan copany's will get a good buissness oppertunity in the field of reacter builg etc. RUSSIA IS offering us their outdated technology in kudamgulan reacter project. Orginal deal was singned on 1985 NOT A SINGLE ATOMIC REACTERS ARE BUILT IN US AFTER 1973.DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE NOT MAKING NEW ATOMIC POWER STATIONS BECAUSE THEIR EXPERIANCE IN THE ACCIDENTS OF CHERNOBIL AND THREE MAIL ISLAND, ITS FINANCIAL IMPLICATION CAN FINISH A COUNTRY AND ITS ECCONAMY THINK BEFORE BLINDLY SUPPORING THE DEAL AND CALLING THE LEFT ANTIINDIANNS AND CHINEESE SPY'S
RE:nuclear deal
by AK on Jul 08, 2008 04:42 PM Permalink
If lot of NSG countries stop supplying fuel to India, France and Russia will come forward. They do not tow the US line.
RE:nuclear deal
by AK on Jul 08, 2008 05:22 PM Permalink
Once US accepts India as a responsible Nuclear Power, they cannot ask others not to supply. This is the reason it cannot be debated in the parliament.
hahahhaha...wishful thinking, you , AK, have no idea of realpolitik, France and russia will not lift a finger to help us, if America does not want them to.
RE:nuclear deal
by AK on Jul 08, 2008 05:09 PM Permalink
I feel that you do not know the world politics. France and Russia are reluctant in accepting an UniPolar world withg US at its helm. They will look for the first real cause to break away as was the case with Iraq War. Iraq was not a responsible power, but India is and thus France and Russia will be credible in supporting India.
RE:RE:nuclear deal
by All Right on Jul 08, 2008 05:11 PM Permalink
Good... so no need to sign any petty ego-massaging deals... BJP was right after all, innit?
India has always followed the policy of non alignment and has never sided with one country or the other. US had a view that "either you are with us or against us" and that led them to conclude that India was against US. India has always voiced its views in the UN, WTO or GATT and is considered to be the bad guys by the west. To ratify this agreement US Congress has to override their own HYDE ACT and it will not be easy. This agreement will finally recognize India as a responsible Nuclear Power. Forget Left or Right, stay at the Center.
RE:India & its Past
by RAVEENDRAN on Jul 08, 2008 06:51 PM Permalink
If there is no anybody to oppose US in international politics then why Indian communists alone making noise? What is the wrong cooperating with US.Already India have a lot of cooperation in the Economic Field.
How being slaves to US will be in the interests of India is anybody's guess.
The nuclear deal, only christians can rejoice cos it takes India closer to US, but HINDUS????
US will charm India to take the deal and run the nation on the nuclear energy. Once it is done, they will start turning the screws. you cannot do this, you cannot do that, you can do only what we (US) say........And all hindus will be slaves of America, just doing what America wants you to do...NRI's who are supporting the deal (so US and INdia can come closer) do not understand how dangerous this trap is..Once you get in THERE IS NO WAY OUT...YOU ARE TRAPPED FOR EVER.
RE:Nuclear deal
by Subash Patel on Jul 08, 2008 04:49 PM Permalink
US is not Christian country. But majority of them are. Its land of multi-culture. Know your facts before writing.
And because of people like you (projecting as patriots), who bring religion before progress, India is still a backward country.
India needs to have a two party system similar to US/UK and other European countries. We should get rid these smaller parties, who are playing spoil sport for the last sixty years. Most of these are operated by stupids such as Laloo, Rabri, Mayawati, Paswan, Jayalalita etc. who can not be even good chaprasis in government offices. These people only know how to pull the progress of the nation down, to fulfill their own cheap political goals.
RE:Only two party system
by Ram Sharma on Jul 08, 2008 04:37 PM Permalink
Due to regional differences, mainly on account of language and religion, and also due to caste based reservation, it will not b possible to hv 2 party system.
RE:Only two party system
by Demo-crazy on Jul 08, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
Two party system can still be possible even when we have language barrier. Now most people understand Hindi to some degree even in states like Tamilnadu.
It is almost impossible to achieve in current scenario. Slowly, we have moved to two alliance model where one is a rightist party, and the other is leftist or left of centre, based on how one wishes to label them.
MMS is rushing for the deal and helping Bush to divert peoples' attention from galloping inflation and farmers' suicide. The main problem of the country is galloping inflation and population growth. But he is not bothered. He only wants to help Bush, who (as per a New York Times report), wants us to sign the deal, so that he can show to the country that he has done something for the good of his country (USA).
Why UPA does not promote family planning on the lines of China, where one child is a norm since 1979?
RE:MMS is rushing for the deal and helping Bush to divert peoples' attention
by Nanchil on Jul 08, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
MMS started this deal much before inflation started increasing.
RE:MMS is rushing for the deal and helping Bush to divert peoples' attention
by Ram Sharma on Jul 08, 2008 04:29 PM Permalink
Yes we know that. But sometime back he had said that this deal is not everything. After inflation started increasing and he was not able to control it, he has suddenly felt the urgency for the deal for diverting peoples' attention.
RE:MMS is rushing for the deal and helping Bush to divert peoples' attention
by Abhimanyu Singh on Jul 08, 2008 04:40 PM Permalink
Hi Ram Ji,
So many parties have won in your name and after that they forgot you. Any new thing is always good, These people also opposed computers do you remember. But we have most reputed jobs in that field. After signing this deal, if you do not see any positive change please let me know, If I see..... RAM JI I will come back to you.
RE:MMS is rushing for the deal and helping Bush to divert peoples' attention
by Ramanath Babu on Jul 08, 2008 04:58 PM Permalink
Mr. Singh,Don't compare apples with oranges. N-deal and computers are two different things. I would request you to consult some B.Tech or M.tech engineers and know more about N-projects. You can make effient power from enriched uranium, and the residues of the same are used for making n-bombs. If you are not using the same for n-bombs, you have to dispose off those residues deep down in our mother earth, otherwise, it will cause radiation. EVen after all precautions, incidents like Chernobyl can happen and that is why N-power plants are not coming in developed countries these days.
RE:MMS is rushing for the deal and helping Bush to divert peoples' attention
by Ram Sharma on Jul 08, 2008 04:56 PM Permalink
We would not b able to contact each other in future, as we don't hv each others email id.
However anything new need not necessarily b good, similarly anything old also need not necessarily b bad. When u go to buy something in the market, u choose from different items. If all new things were good, u would hv bought anything that the businessman gave u.
Taj Mahal, Eifel Tower, Great Wall of China, Pyramid etc r old, but they r good.
Now we hv traffic jams, polluted water (15 yr ago did u hear about bottled drinking water?), polluted air, depleting subsoil water table, global warming, 620 cr people on earth (population explosion) etc. There r very bad for whole mankind.
RE:MMS is rushing for the deal and helping Bush to divert peoples' attention
by Bharat Kr on Jul 08, 2008 05:10 PM Permalink
We patriots and nationalists will never support this unfair and unequal Master-Slave deal. Note, MM Singh condemned India's nuclear test in 1998. Now he along with his Italian master determined to strip India's nuclear weapon status and roll-back our weapon program. Read the Hyde act and think.
US would have supported commies if they wanted to destroy India like the chinese are doing now! go and see the situation in bengal after 32 years of communist rule! if US wanted to make india like that, they would have done it by helping the communism spreading all over india! they know it is more effective than dropping an Atom Bomb
RE:US would have supported Commies!!
by Ram Sharma on Jul 08, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
If it was possible, USA will not allow communism anywhere in the world, so that there is noone to challenge Capitalism. But it could not finish communism in Cuba on its borders. Though it succeded in USSR due to the policies of Gorvachov (who later thought that he should not hv gone for prestroika and glasnost), but in China they went for experimentation of combining Communism & Capitalism, as none of the systems is fully capable of solving all the problems of mankind and making them happy.
RE:US would have supported Commies!!
by prince george on Jul 08, 2008 04:30 PM Permalink
Communism around the world was distroyed not by the activities of US but due the strong resistance of the people there! once there were 60 nations iunder communist rule now it is almost less than 6! if you see the non demacratic states around the world now either they will be commi ruled or will be islamic!
RE:US would have supported Commies!!
by Ram Sharma on Jul 08, 2008 04:42 PM Permalink
Do u know that the developed nations started using many good things of communism like unemployment dole, free medical help etc after communism took root in USSR etc?
