Loan waiver and inflation in food grain prices (agriculture prises) will certainly benefits the farmers. BJP's ally Akali Dal is willing to given support on Nuclear deal to UPA government. On what basis BJP is opposing this deal. Even their allies will not remain intact on nuclear deal. Due to anti-incumbancy factor in various BJP ruled states and congress ruled states, the talley of their seats will remain same in the next election. Congress may gain in Kerala, Bengal and loan waiver, price rise in agriculture produce will certainly benefit congress.
RE:Farmer's Message
by rangdebasanti on Jul 08, 2008 04:39 PM Permalink
day dreamer. congress was formed to throw away the foreign ruler. Now, an italian waitress, with no virtue of leadership, just because she was married to rajiv, has been worshipped by the same party. what a shame!!! don't you have any self-respect? what knowledge / experience / intelligence she has to lead a country like India? she has the ability to seduce a high-handed pilot; that's all...
RE:Farmer's Message
by shailendra lande on Jul 08, 2008 04:58 PM Permalink
Advani Lohapurush is Paki born politician, he praises the role of Jinnah during partition. He freed maulana Masood Azhar and Zargar for the benefit of ISI and pakistan. he will ceratin prematurely ejaculate when he comes to power.
RE:Not always
by abhay abhie on Jul 08, 2008 04:34 PM Permalink
Becasue it did no tilt the balance.
Read the article. It is mentioned that the president is going to seek trust vote, as it was on left's support letter the UPA was asked to form the governemnt after the election results were declared. Thier support tilted the balance then and for the future of the government.
Had SP submited a letter of support to the presedent (as it is not mandatory now) and had it tilted the balance, then may be there could be an option as not to seek trust vote.
But in a democratic setup, it is a rule to seek trust vote when there is visible tilt in the balance be within the positive side also.
Note: Kalam asked left a letter of support to ensure the stabilty of government and to sapre the the tax payer from another election is a short time
RE:Not always
by Shyam on Jul 08, 2008 04:22 PM Permalink
The number of MPs with the leader matters yaar. Mayawati hasn't got the numbers to topple the government, but the Communists have around 60 MPs who can make a difference. You may remember, when the UPA was making numbers four years ago, a crucial margin of about 30 was needed and after a lot of trading the Commies came forward with about 60 seats offering outside support - that is not joining the Government. So, Somnath Chatterjee was made the Speaker, which is a cabinet minister level position.
RE:Not always
by usefulldata on Jul 08, 2008 04:22 PM Permalink
becz Mayawati was given support from out side and Congress have sufficient no for majority but now they dont have.
RE:Not always
by Kalyan on Jul 08, 2008 04:40 PM Permalink
It is crime by any party to have alliance with parties having different ideologies.That way Congress has already done a crime by having gone to Communists.On the nation's interest and to avoid a huge expenditure for an election now,some body's support is welcome.But to get SP's support it is said that CBI cases against Mulayam will be withdrawn by Congress.What is this congress?Is it that congress which was originally intended by Mahatma?Really heart is bleeding with the blood of helplessness and agony.Congress party should be reorganised with Dr.Manmohan as leader minus Sonia like elements and other corrupt politicians in that party,psychophants,etc.Is this a DREAM?
RE:Not always
by vignesh vig on Jul 08, 2008 04:24 PM Permalink
That is because it is very clear that there will be no adverse impact because of BSP's withdrawal of support. Wisdom played a role here.
RE:RE:Motion
by popat laal on Jul 08, 2008 04:37 PM Permalink
not really.. bjp will win the elections anyway.. because incumbency factor and non performance on neucler as well as inflation front will kill congress...
RE:Motion
by mohankumar on Jul 08, 2008 04:34 PM Permalink
If Congress fail Confidence Motion,Sonia will suffer LOOSE MOTION. If Sonia will suffer LOOSE MOTION, Mulayam will sit and clean the floor of Lok Sabha.
RE:RE:RE:Motion
by popat laal on Jul 08, 2008 04:38 PM Permalink
not really.. bjp will win the elections anyway.. because incumbency factor and non performance on neucler as well as inflation front will kill congress...
RE:Motion
by vijay dhar on Jul 08, 2008 04:28 PM Permalink
If Congress loses no-confidence motion, post man prime Minister will do the job of clerk and italian lady will have loose motions to get treated in Italy
Knowing the credentials our our president, one should not be surprised if she gives UPA 08 months time to prove majority on the floor of the Parliament House.
RE:No Confidence Motion
by Bajrangi on Jul 08, 2008 04:17 PM Permalink
rightly said..she is the household servant of gandhi family...looks and acts worst than when rabri devi was made the CM of Bihar ..a mockery of democracy
RE:No Confidence Motion
by shailendra lande on Jul 08, 2008 04:20 PM Permalink
if decision goes in congress's favour then its a mockery of democracy...if not then its a true democracy. what a biased approach.
RE:No Confidence Motion
by Madhu on Jul 08, 2008 04:36 PM Permalink
The MP's who won and went to parliament with majority will decide the future. Barking of dogs wont open the gate.
RE:No Confidence Motion
by Shyam on Jul 08, 2008 04:24 PM Permalink
What a great President we got after the noble Dr.Kalam! Pity on us all Indians! This is the standard of our democracy!
RE:No Confidence Motion
by Kalyan on Jul 08, 2008 04:49 PM Permalink
We should curse ourselves for not having given a majority to BJP.they are also not straight forward.Atleast we could remain with our heads upright.Now we are bowing to every one without iota of self esteem.This is waht this congress party has done to our country.The once staunch supporter of Congress,I am loosing confidence day by day in them.How Dr.Singh like persons are still able to live in that muddy party controlled by some one who has no connection what so ever with our country?Dr.Singh has to listen to conscience here onwards and take his decision.Will he do?
RE:No Confidence Motion
by chandrashekar nayak on Jul 08, 2008 04:24 PM Permalink
Hope you will remember her goof-ups when she had been to Clile, Mexico and Brazil on official tour recently.High handed behaviour of her son who was a part of the delegates( I still do not in what capacity he went there). India was openly humiliated in Mexico.This is the kind of President UPA gave to the nation. The prime Minister, The president, The Vice president.... all are same.No self respect.lameduck people.
RE:RE:No Confidence Motion
by Madhu on Jul 08, 2008 04:43 PM Permalink
Whose fault? why didn't you stand as a presidential candidate? If so you would have got zero votes..hahahah
RE:No Confidence Motion
by jagar singh on Jul 08, 2008 04:27 PM Permalink
if so,why should NDA go to her?in any case,parliament is meeting towards end of july.nda may try.
RE:RE:RE:No Confidence Motion
by Shyam on Jul 08, 2008 04:26 PM Permalink
Who is following the Constitution? Even if somebody approaches the Supreme Court for a legal recourse, the SCI will take its own sweet time which may be more than 8 months!
RE:RE:RE:RE:No Confidence Motion
by rangdebasanti on Jul 08, 2008 04:35 PM Permalink
truly said. afzal guru is still waiting to be hanged... I think it would enter guineese book of world records.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:No Confidence Motion
by Kalyan on Jul 08, 2008 04:53 PM Permalink
Because he is Muslim.Congres will loose votes na?Muslims are not bad.Congress is very very bad,shabby.
RE:No Confidence Motion
by Siddique Ansari on Jul 08, 2008 05:48 PM Permalink
Do'nt call people like Afzal Guru as muslims. They are terrorists first and terrorists last. And that is why the party in power is afraid to hang him. It is fear of retaliation from the terrorists, and not fear of losing muslim votes.
