all hindu's wanted was A FEW PIECES OF BLUE PLASTIC, TO BE HUNG ON THIS 10-acre PIECE OF LAND, TEMPORARILY, THAT TOO TEMPORARILY FOR TWO MONTHS. AND WHY? SO THE YATRI'S (including EIGHTY-YEAR OLD WOMEN), COULD BE PROTECTED FROM THE SUN's HEAT, AS THEY WALKED HUNDRED OF KILOMETERS, IN THE RELENTNESS DAYTIME HEAT! AND THE MUSLIMS DENIED THIS TO US AS WELL?
General SK Sinha knows that the PDP is using its terrorists to kill our jawans.
and why did soniaji JUST give them 2,200 ACRES for the BRAND-SPANKING-NEW Islamic University?
and why she gave hundreds of crores to construct that EVIL-MUGHAL-ROAD, over which millions of hindu's died of untold misery, all at the hands of yesterday's evil-mughal forces?
But when the matter of Haj comes up, they are provided every facility at government expense – yes, the Delhi government’s expense. Haj houses, increased quotas every year, ambulances, hospitals, doctors and free delegates for Mecca at government expense. Extra-large Haj terminals and extra-constitutional reservations in jobs and educational facilities.
1.I think hindus are a divided lot.they are not specific vote bank.
2.too much liberal thinking.in even america you can not win election unless you are converted to christianity.eg.bobby jindal and many other forein origin people.
3.we hindus tend to be overt tolernt,excess of every thing is bad.in which country 85 % of majority community has to see amarnath land order revoked because of communal muslims of kashmir(there plea is that demography of kashmirwill be changed) and lacs of hindus has to flee.disgusting! and see the opposite in bengal where bangladeshi muslims are settled deliberately to change demography.
4.regionalism-problem of a hindu of a particular area is his problem.hindus of other areas do not support.
5.in a country of 85% hindus ,catholic lady holds govt. , a sikh becomes pm and a muslim president.
6.we hindus are hypocrites.we try to overshow how liberal we are?whenever there is problem of other religions we are first to stand and shoutagainst it. how many people of other religions have supported hindus during any crisis such as amarnath land transfer,bomb blasts etc.?
7.we are harsher towards our own fellow hindus while too softer to any other religion people and foreigners.
8.lack of self respect .
9.indiffernce to our heritage,such as ram setu etc. majority hindus do not care about any heritage.
RE:REASONS FOR APPEASEMENT POLICY
by khaleel nazeer on Jul 07, 2008 05:13 PM Permalink
Dear Rocker!!!!!!!!! Wake up. The Era of muslim president has gone. Now the President is a Hindu lady. Happy!!!!!!!!!I think all your problems have solved. Politicians are politicians, they have no Religion. Atleast last President & present PM were highly educated & quite honest candidates compare to others.
RE:REASONS FOR APPEASEMENT POLICY
by mahendra sapa on Jul 07, 2008 08:37 PM Permalink
I believe Rocker didn't mean to malign our President and PM. His complain is against the fellow Hindu who are very selfish and overly tolerant. His complain is that Hindus live for individuals, they don't think in community.
I'm sure Rocker respects our PM and former President, as both are Indians first.
It is high time all right thinking Hindus project a united face and force government to end the aparthied to Hinduism in its own land.
It is reported that those who are going to Amarnath are looted at gun point by he muslims. IT is time we retaliate. There is no point in criticising each other. Sitting at our office in the air-conditioned atmosphere, please do not pass on the buck to vHP, RSS or BJP. Charity begins at home. Before criticising others, just think what you have done for your country. Hinduism is so inter-mingled with nationalism that we cannot separate them. Dent on Hinduism is dent on our nationalism. Every Hindu worth his salt should educate atleast five more person per day, about the need of Hindu unity, cutting across castelines. A movement is needed if we are to stop the congressies and the communists and other so-called secular parties from their appeasement policies.
I hope, everyone should realise the gravity of the situation and arise accordingly.
RE:for kashmir every Indian from nook and corner will fight
by gac on Jul 07, 2008 02:04 PM Permalink
amit, if u still believe kashmir is an integral part of india, why there is no IPC in kashmir? jus like POK it is IOK(indian occupied kashmir)
RE:RE:for kashmir every Indian from nook and corner will fight
by sanjay raina on Jul 07, 2008 02:54 PM Permalink
hi you fool when you people understand the meaning of english pok means pak occupied kashmir & our kashmir is not iok india occupied kashmir becoz it is part of india like up,bihar,gujrat etc these states are not known as indian occupied up,bihar,guj etc.
pok name is given by un becoz it is still disputed place that is why it is not still recognised with pak. understand
RE:RE:RE:for kashmir every Indian from nook and corner will fight
by Ramanath Babu on Jul 07, 2008 04:47 PM Permalink
Certain portion of Kashmir was forcily occupied by pakistan in 1967. Due to adverse whether and difficult geographical conditions, indians jawans could not liberate this land and a cease fire was declared. The status-quo on this land is still continuing with Pak occupying that part of Kashmir, and hence it is Pok. That place is rightfully belong to India.
