RE:THESE BAZZARDS WILL BANCKUPT INDIA...
by Albert Adibadla on Jul 06, 2008 08:40 AM Permalink
HAIL ADVAI- INDIAN HITLER LONG LIVE MODI- INDIAN MUSOLLINI
RE:RE:THESE BAZZARDS WILL BANCKUPT INDIA...
by arunim devroy on Jul 06, 2008 09:53 AM Permalink
well depends upon from what perspective u r looking at .... from a Jews point Taliban is no close to Nazis
After finishing the four and half year in power why now congress is worries about the n-deal, why not they have taknen decision earlier. This fact everybody know, Congress want to divert people attention from inflation to n-deal. They knwo inflation is more dangerous than n-deal. Growing up inflation is proof of bad financial management of govt. On the economic part the present govt is totally failled, They would win lok shabha election on last five year performance. Congress want to divert people attention from basic fact to nominal fact.
And hand samajbadi party have own political problem in uttar pradesh, Really they dont worries from N-Deal but from Mayawati good govermance. Anybody can see how well there govt is working. Both congress and sp is more concern with politics not with n-deal, they knwo in next election only bjp will come in power, People mostly educated have already make the mind for bjp and that is why in recent all election they are winning. Now conggress and sp started again dram in name of communalnal point. What the communinal , if you do the politics in name of cast that means you want to divide the contries in three thousand and two hundred part (total cast in india is 3200/-) and if you want to divide the nation in name of relision that means it would divided in only four part. Now tell me who is dangerour those want to divide the nation is in 3200 part or four part. Therfore if any body say communal word that mean real means is something else.
RE:Drama of politics by congress and sp
by ASHOK on Jul 06, 2008 10:22 AM Permalink
See this >>Indo-US nuke deal: A timeline
The Indo-US nuclear deal, comes after months of negotiations and lobbying. Here’s the bumpy ride the deal has had:
July 27, 2006: US House passes Indo-US nuclear Bill by a landslide July 26, 2006: India won't accept new conditions in N-deal: PM July 19: We will stand up for the deal we negotiated: Burns July 15: Bush, Putin praise Indian non-proliferation July 06: Indians in US did their bit- Minister for Overseas Indian Affairs June 29: US Senate Foreign Relations Committee marks up the bill for implementing N-deal with 16 members voting in favour and only two against it June 28, 2006: US House of Representatives international relations committee passes Bill seeking Indo-US nuke deal implementation by an overwhelming 37-5 majority June 23: India says it is committed to credible minimum deterrent June 22: US says it is against deal breaker changes to N-deal May 12, 2006: N-separation plan tabled in Parliament May 18, 2006: N-deal to be within July 18 framework: Rice to Indian parliamentarians April 20, 2006: N-deal must be seen in light of growing ties: Rice March 02, 2006: India-US ink landmark nuclear agreement July 18, 2005: Bush-Singh joint statement calls for a nuke deal between two countries.
RE:RE:Drama of politics by congress and sp
by ASHOK on Jul 06, 2008 10:25 AM Permalink
This cleraly shows how ignorant fools like you DERAIL and misinform the rest.
rajnish singh Better go back to sleep and for never to wake up again. You are one of those KARAT and party.
RE:Drama of politics by congress and sp
by ASHOK on Jul 06, 2008 10:18 AM Permalink
rajnish singh, look at Variuos steps taken by MM singh, It will be clear that MM Sing started building up since 2005. It was year 2005 when he signed first MOU with BUSH and set the process in motion. You have no idea of time lime. It seems you have just woken up and started BLABBERING.
RE:Drama of politics by congress and sp
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 09:48 AM Permalink
Cut the crap.
At least the UPA-Left coalition problem cropped up at the end of 4 1/2 yrs. This is far better than NDA who put up regular soap operas - Maya, Jaya, Mamta etc tantrums, leaving, rejoining, leaving again for very trivial reasons.
when more tension is going in the politics,what is prathiba patil is doing.please anyone answer for it. she is like robot,perfectly screwed by sonia. at this critical time she is saying that ,there should be education for all girls.there by giving this statement,she is reminding us that there is a person called president.
RE:i am laughing
by Gazanfar Z Azmi on Jul 06, 2008 09:45 AM Permalink
Dear Karthikeyan, We are Parlamentary type of Democracy (Not presidential like US). Here President is the Titular Head...So ur Question is irrelevant.
RE:RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by Albert Adibadla on Jul 06, 2008 08:48 AM Permalink
NO . BHARA MATA KI JAI!!! RAJU BHAYYA KI JAI!!!
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by SachinTheGreat on Jul 06, 2008 07:53 AM Permalink
U Paki Get Lost....................
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by Albert Adibadla on Jul 06, 2008 08:47 AM Permalink
HA HA HA!!! CALLING A SOUTH INDIAN BRAHMIN A PAKI!!! THEY WILL SHOOT ME IF I GO ANYWHERE NEAR PAKISTAN!!! HA HA HA!!!
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by Mahesh on Jul 06, 2008 08:38 AM Permalink
Don't worry, they would leave a little for you to eat. Your food will not be taken away.
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by Albert Adibadla on Jul 06, 2008 08:50 AM Permalink
OK. BUT YOU ARE TAKING AWAY MY DUG IF YOU THINK I AM A COW!!!
RE:RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by ann ronie on Jul 06, 2008 09:11 AM Permalink
He is talking about cow dung not about cow's food. Which breed are u who eat cow dung?
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by Indian Indian on Jul 06, 2008 08:34 AM Permalink
You, Loan Shark & Shirodikar are MMS, Maino Antonia and her worthless son. who else in the world would supprort congress after seeing 4 years of utter nonsence, no-perfrmance & complete by a so called govt.
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by Albert Adibadla on Jul 06, 2008 08:42 AM Permalink
NO. I AM A BIG FAN ON RAHUL MAHAJAN. HE IS MY LEADER. DRUGS, WOMEN AND MONEY IS OUR MOTTO!!! HA HA HA!!
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 09:52 AM Permalink
No performance? You knickerwallah trait - spreading disinformation. Following is an extract from Business Standard:
"Start with the performance of the economy. Its growth rate last year has been upped from 8.7 per cent to 9 per cent, taking the average rate of growth in the four years of the Manmohan Singh government to 8.9 per cent. I cannot think of any other government that would not make a bit of a noise about such stellar success, and draw comparisons with the record of its predecessor (5.9 per cent over six years) — showing a jump of 50 per cent. Or take agriculture, whose annual growth during the UPA term has been 3.6 per cent — again a jump of nearly 50 per cent, and the best record since the 1980s"
RE:WE DO NOT NEED MUSLIM PETROLIUM AND CHRISTIAN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY
by don dicosta on Jul 06, 2008 01:12 PM Permalink
forget about all this bullshit about growth rate and all this.is normal person is happy with abnormal price rise no .WHY SUDENLY RISE PETROL PRICE WHY DID WITHHOLD FOR LONG TIME .WHERE IS THIS PAWAR? SO YOUR GROWTH RATES HAVE STOPED FROM FARMAERS SUCIDE.AFTER 4 1/2 YEARS CHIDU IS BLAMING VAJPEY FOR FERTILISE SUPPLY.WHY SUDDEN RELEASE OF 60000CRORES FO LOAN WAIVER ........!ELECTION IN KARNATAK. YOU PEOPLE STILL THINK INDHIRQA GANDHI ALIVE AND WHAT A BAD MOUTH YOU ARE WASH WITH DETTOL
It is quite premature for BJP to ask Dr Singh to prove the strength before the left effectively withdrew their sport.It shows how over enthusiastic BJP is for fall of the Govt.Well!!It is an understandable desire for any opposition with prospects of victory to grab the power at the earlist,but it is too much for any party to behave so and expose their power mongerism.Congree is right when it counter queries as to where is the question of proving its strength when,none,so far,has withdrawn its support.One thing is very cetatin!Congress cannot also rely on the support of Samajwad Paty for a long tome since it is not that strong a bondage that arose out of mutual respect for the other,but only a political expediency which could wither away any time.Any way,by the support of Samajwadi Party,Congress is going to get a fresh lease of life-say at least for 2/3 months after which,even if Samajwadi party too withdraws its support,it can continue as care taker govt till the next elections are held & a new govt is formed.As is the case with any govt in power,Congress too wants to reap all the benefits (including use of govt machinery),accruing out of of continuance in the power till the last day. What is the point in left parties's apprising Jyothi Basu,the communist patriarch,of their move when the latter vented his mind very recently with a categorical expression that socialism cannot work.Strifed with all these cheap politics & inflation like crisis,country is in a bad shape now.
I am in a big setback after knowing that BJP is not supporting N-Deal. Is BJP is doing this only because of opposition party. Now i feel guilt to support BJP blindly from last 20 years.
RE:Shiv Sena is supporting N-Deal then why not BJP.
by Kamal on Jul 06, 2008 08:24 AM Permalink
Me too. Support the party for the moment who does good. Do not be a permamnent supporter, they are taking advantage, I am also supporter of BJP, but this time I would not vote for them, they must be punished for wrong deed.
RE:Shiv Sena is supporting N-Deal then why not BJP.
by Shobichan Arackal on Jul 06, 2008 07:16 AM Permalink
Dear friend this is POLITICS. They do not think what the nation gains or looses, they think only how they get. But the people like you are ver few.
Well said Mr. Amar Singh, "Communalism is a bigger threat than imperialism." and that "L K Advani is a bigger threat than George W Bush."
BJP's prime ministerial candidate Advani in saying the government has been reduced to a minority and demanding that the prime minister immediately seek a vote of confidence in the Lok Sabha shows his desperation to become the P.M. so much so that he does not even want to see what is good and what is bad for the nation.
We are not oil producing giants. Even otherwise world'd oil reserves are fast depleting and won't last more than half a century. The alternate source of energy being nuclear energy has to be sought for. India does not have enriched Uranium and to develop the technique would take India 20 years. So do we lag behind the world by 20 years! Think dispassionately shedding Party affiliations. Even Dr. Kalam, an expert in the nuclear field, has endorsed the nuclear deal - saying India cannot do without it. Then why there is hue and cry against the nuclear deal.
BJP is simply trying to be opportunist.
Thank you Amar Singh and Mulayam Singh and thank you S.P. for supporting the nuclear deal which is very essential for India.
Thank you Mr. Manmohan Singh for showing your grit in pursuing the nuclear deal.
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by don dicosta on Jul 06, 2008 01:22 PM Permalink
OK WHAT DID BUSH DID DO IN IRAQ,AFAGNISTHAN.IS BETTER THAN ADVANI.NO BJO OR BAJARANG HAVE FOUGHT FROM BACK.THEY ARE NOT LIKE TERRORISTS KILLING,LOOTING ALL OVER WORLD.ONEDAY WHEN YOU SUFFER PERSONNALY U WILL RELASIE WHAT ADVANI IS TO THE COUNTRY.
ANYWAY WHERE IS JAYAPRADA AND OTHER AUNT TURNED HEROINS . WHAT YOU MUSLIMS NOW REALISE THAT SP MEANS SUCKING PARTY. DO YOU KNOW WHAT RELIAENCE PETROLIUM IS DOING
WHY CHIDU WAS SILENT WITH THESE ABNORMAL SHARE PRICES.
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by shashi sharma on Jul 06, 2008 07:42 AM Permalink
People think that Advani is a Nationalist .A day will come when situation on terror front,Price front,unemployment front will get so worse that Amar Singh will also agree that Advani is a nationalist.Pseusoseculars have hidden agenda to diclare India as Muslim state it seems.
I have been in the energy field for my entire career of 30 years. Deal or no deal---India will lose, even if the deal was absolutely conditions free.
Every Nuclear plant will have both cost and time overruns costing India Billions. It will be 15 years before you can switch one bulb on.
WE have unlimited coal and technology for clean power generation at fraction of the cost and time. The waste ash is a tremendously useful byproduct for infrstructure pojects.
India is blessed with unlimited areas of year round sun. Wind and hydro.
Sonia-MMS-Chidabaram-Pranab violted the RBI 1934 act and squandered Rs.200,000 crores of FDI investments under USA/CIA pressure to buy 0% US treasury bonds.
With the Nuclear Deal they will walk away with millions of dollars in kickbacks.
The ONLY way to stop this is by the aam aadmi being educated and taking to the streets. SADLY.
RE:MORE LOOTERS JOIN THE GANG OF THIEVES...
by MADAN KAPOOR on Jul 06, 2008 03:14 PM Permalink
Dear Mr Ashok,
In Buisness Line of 6.7.08, excerpts from a lecture by Dr. Kakodkar, A.E.C. Chairman for your comments as you too are an expert.
Dr. Kakodkar writes and I quote ".. the country would have an energy deficit of 412 GWe in the next 42 years at the per capita consumption rate of 5000kwh a year. This cannot be met even after using all available domestic energy resources. Of all the non-coal based energy options, nuclear energy was the best bet but the country's ongoing nuclear programme badly needed to import uranium or reactors, which is possible only if the country signs the international cooperation agreement."
"History will not forgive us" if this is not done now, AEC Chief said.
Referring to 'Energy Gap' AEC Chief says "If India is unable to import nuclear reactors or nuclear fuel under international cooperation it must import coal to the tune of 1.6 billion tonnes in 2050 alone, unless solar capacity grows at even large levels". Subjecting a large country to the vegaries of such large coal imports on a regular basis would have shocking economic effects, AEC Chief said.
He says energy gap in 2050 can be bridged by importing 40-GWe capacity LWRs by 2012-20. The spent fule from these LWRs would be used for FBRs that will wipe out energy deficit by 2050.
A delay of a decade in importing these would create an energy deficit of 178GWe by 2050 and the coal import need would go up to .7 billion tonnes - twice the annual coal needed today, he says."
RE:Iraqies want referendum over deal with US
by Dennis Crasta on Jul 06, 2008 08:15 AM Permalink
'The treaty must be presented to the people and the clergy,' The treaty should be presented to the public that is fine... To the clergy (that is bullshit). So they want to create another Saudi Arabia where the clergy rule not the king. With these clergy ruling what else can you expect than religious wars.
SEOUL -- Tens of thousands of people demonstrated in South Korea's capital Saturday against U.S. beef imports. It was the second-largest rally in a series of near-daily protests held for the past two months prompted by concerns over the safety of American beef imports.
A rally on June 10 drew a crowd estimated by police at about 80,000.
"Start renegotiation!" the protesters chanted, raising their candles to the sky. A large placard tied to balloons above them read "Complete renegotiation! Candles will prevail."
The demonstrators want an April agreement under which South Korea agreed to resume imports of U.S. beef rescinded and renegotiated.
The deal has sparked public outrage amid widespread perceptions, fanned in part by sensational media reports, that it exposes the country to a higher risk of mad cow disease. The protesters are also denouncing other policies of President Lee Myung-bak, including his plan to privatize state corporations.
