Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 707 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
commies have no shame
by vanitha on Jul 06, 2008 12:47 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Congress openly said that they will go ahead with the nuclear deal.

Commies have no shame.

What are they waiting for?

Will they wait till the government goes to IAEA?

Or, will they wait till the US builds a nuclear reactor and starts generating power?

If they are really interested in national interest, let them withdraw support, vote against the government and prevent the nuclear deal.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:commies have no shame
by sanjay rai on Jul 06, 2008 12:54 PM  Permalink
Rightly said Vanitha...
Anyway BJP will be in power in next elections. Advani has more political knowledge than MM Singh. I will request Mr SIngh to be finance minister in ADvanis govt.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Great Show
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 12:47 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

When we elected a dummy as a prime minister, we should have expected all these things. What is the final outcome of nuclear deal, nothing material. This Chaprasi and his Talibani Party do not have any issue to face elections so they are simply creating Dramas.Anyway, SP can effectively help congress realising Talibani dreams and already JK Govt has fully met the demands of Taliban on Amarnath land scandal. Our filth gra



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Great Show
by Sandip Singh on Jul 06, 2008 12:49 PM  Permalink
Nuclear deal is inmaterial, common give me a break. Our dying nuclear reactors do need the fissile material: Uranium. Nuclear deal is in favour of India. We should support it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Great Show
by vanitha on Jul 06, 2008 12:51 PM  Permalink

The issue not whether or not we need Uranium and nuclear energy.

The issue is the unacceptable conditions imposed by US.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Great Show
by Sandip Singh on Jul 06, 2008 12:55 PM  Permalink
Keep aside your ego for some time. Its a compromise, one has to give and take something

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Great Show
by vanitha on Jul 06, 2008 12:49 PM  Permalink

We did not elect him.

Sonia selected him, as per her inner voice.

After being the de facto Prime Minister for the last 4 years, she gained legitimacy and is eager to become the Prime Minister in 2009.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Great Show
by Sandip Singh on Jul 06, 2008 12:54 PM  Permalink
I guess she will not become prime minister. Because she fears her death like what happened to Indira gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Amar is the best
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 12:45 PM  Permalink 

SP in general and M/s Amar Singh and Mulayam Singh are sheep in Wolf clothing, cunning like Fox and they are more danegrous than Osama Bin Laden. People of India will never believe duo who has brought down the political spectre to the lowest ebb. Even some terroists like Osama bin Laden has some principle but not these two who deserves to be collared by the people of India with the stick of their votes. Congress by joining hands with SP has put a last nail in their coffin and will pay heavy price for the dealwith SP behind the N-deal.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
aAmar nationalism
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 12:40 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Amar Singh is our latest Mhatma Gandhi, fully inspired by great thoughts of Laden and Lucknowi Muzhrawallis. This person with Mulayam and filth grade chaprasi shall definitely fulfill cherished dreams of Talibans.We can give the Father of nation honour to Amar Singh and Bharat ratna to Mulayam for serving Taliban.We can bring all kothewallis to Delhi and confer Padma Bhushan to them for producing a wonderful guy like Amar Singh amd Mulayam Singh.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:aAmar nationalism
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 12:46 PM  Permalink
Do by all means. But first let us confer Bharat Ratna on Advani and Karat. The first for giving Jinnah respectively and the latter for promoting Chinese interests over India

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:aAmar nationalism
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 12:48 PM  Permalink
Advani si already Bharat Ratna. Do not worry about him. He does not need taliban to stand up.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Gali Gali mein shor hei
by ashok kumar on Jul 06, 2008 12:32 PM  Permalink 

Gali Gali mein shor hei...congress-SP chor hei....backdoor operators!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Chor Chor Bhai Bhai
by karma bharati on Jul 06, 2008 12:24 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Opportunism has reached at its peak in India and look who is leading the pack. Mr Manmohan singh, one of the most respected and qualified PM. If he is letting govt to stoop to this level, God only save this country

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Chor Chor Bhai Bhai
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 12:33 PM  Permalink
MMS leading the pack?

The Karnataka BJP got 3 opposition MLAS to quit and stand for re-election under their party symbol yesterday. The mining mafia proudly paraded these MLAs to the press.

At one point, the NDA had the two Dravadian parties supporting them. Even if one analyzes the NDA we find two categories of parties - BJP and Shiv Sena representing Hindutva forces and others like JDU, TMC etc - anti-Hindutuva forces.

And this is the short list!

It is the height of hypocrisy for kickerwallahs to comment on opportunistic politic alignments!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Chor Chor Bhai Bhai
by don dicosta on Jul 06, 2008 12:52 PM  Permalink
BEFORETHAT WHAT HAPPENED.BJPSWEEPED ELECTION INSPITE JUST ON THE PERFORMANCE OF 20 MONTHS RULE.JDS HASSAID THEY MAINTAIN EQUAL DISTANCE FROM CONGRESS AND BJP...WHAT DID THEY DO FOR RECENT GRADUATE ELECTIONS.IF THEIR OWN MEN COME RONNING TO BJP WILLYOU STOP?.BJPHAVE LEARNEDFROM 60 YEARS OF YOUR CONGRESS RULE.
YOU BLAMED BJP IN GUJRATH,GOA,LALMOST ALL STATES THEY HAVE WON A( IN KARNATAK TOP CONGI,CPIM'S PARTY LEADERS EITHER LOST OR SAVED THEIR JUST DEPOSITS).SO YOU KEEP ON BARKING
CHADDIWALAS PLSSS...............

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Government relieved after SP support for trust vote
by BCNayak on Jul 06, 2008 12:14 PM  Permalink 

SP stands for sucker's party.
They can suck any thing of any body at any time,and they are opportunistic.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Nuclear deal is in the interest of india...(Dr.Abdul Kalam)
by Nilesh Mahadik on Jul 06, 2008 12:13 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

let's rely on Dr.Kalam who knows better than anybody from us.India is running short of energy.It is necessary to provide electricity to more than 100 crore peoples of india.Consumption of electricity shows standard of living.Cost of private electricity generation is getting higher because of high cost of diesel.So to live decent life we need electricity than nuclear bomb.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Nuclear deal is in the interest of india...(Dr.Abdul Kalam)
by Anantha Kumar Rajamani on Jul 06, 2008 12:25 PM  Permalink
Has anyone given a thought, as to what would be the cost of electricity, produced out of nuclear fuel? As it is - Aam jantha were raising hue and cry, when Enron started power production at an exorbitant rate of INR 4 per unit. At the end of the day - Enron went bankrupt.
Having said the same, the prime question is: Whether electricity produced out of nuclear fuel would be cheaper and affordable by the common man??? No doubt, ppl. need decent life - but at what cost???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Nuclear deal is in the interest of india...(Dr.Abdul Kalam)
by Uthabda Krishnan on Jul 06, 2008 12:48 PM  Permalink
There is no doubt about it. Production cost of electricity per unit by nuclear fuel is quite lower than by thermal power plants. Further in today's scenario where crude oil price is not under control, the only alternative is nuclear fuel to shut the mouth of gulf countries. This statement is not based on assumption but based on experience since I am in a construction field.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Nuclear deal is in the interest of india...(Dr.Abdul Kalam)
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 12:43 PM  Permalink
Our energy security strategy relies on a basket of technological options - oil, gas, wind, coal, solar, bio-fuels etc

Each of these options have different cost structures. These are also relative. As cost of oil goes up, the viability of other options improves.

Bio-fuels, extraction of petroleum products from coal, wind etc and and also nuclear power have become more attractive once oil. Six months done the line when oil passes US$ 200 per barrel, most options would look much more attractive than oil

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 707 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message