Amar singh is 100% correect. He is afraid of Advani. Because people are for Advani. Why he should be afraid of Bush. Amar Singh is not even a last finger in size before Bush. Amar singh is blabouring.
RE:GOVT. RELIEVED AFTER TRUST VOTE
by PKN on Jul 06, 2008 12:39 AM Permalink
Amar Singh is a bloody fool. Now that the Left has withdrawn the support he will replace Sitaram Yechury. That would not be bad since as clown he is better that Yechury! But he should be less worried of Advani and be more worried of a young member of the Nehru- Gandhi family Rahul. Rahul has already said that he doesn’t want an alliance with SP. What the beta says today the mamma does tomorrow. After the government is saved and once elections are announced Sonia will ditch Mulayam S Yadav. Congress will have the revenge for 1999 in 2009.
RE:SP is breaking for supporting Congress
by Loan Shark on Jul 06, 2008 12:49 AM Permalink
SP rebels will form their own party, they will be stupid to join BJP or congress
The anti-defection act has done this one big damage to party politics ... people don't join a big party because they fear that breaking away later would be impossible. so they form a party of their own and form a coalition.
That's why we see a big surge in regional parties after that act was passed.
RE:SP is breaking for supporting Congress
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 12:08 AM Permalink
Knickerwallahs and Commies are in a state of denial. So humor them. Yes my friends the government falls tomorrow. Now sleep and have good dreams
RE:SP is breaking for supporting Congress by Shirodkar on Jul 06, 2008 12:07
i am sure it is Xinhua (official chinese news agency). only commies can spread such rumours in a last ditch attempt to sabotage the deal.
RE:SP is breaking for supporting Congress
by USamanta on Jul 06, 2008 12:08 AM Permalink
India needs prestigious tie with USA than become a slave of Bush, least popular man today. MMSingh and Congress is making big mistake by keeping most important issues if N-deal secrete, not making public or getting parliament approval.
- Making a strong pitch again for operationalising the Indo-US nuclear deal, Atomic Energy Commission Chief Anil Kakodkar said on Friday that "history will not forgive us" if it is not clinched.
....
"Here is a chance ... without compromising on our principles, we can bridge energy security for the future," Kakodkar said in a public lecture on "Evolving Indian nuclear programme: Rationale and perspectives", organised by the Indian Academy of Sciences.
Without mentioning the deal but giving enough indications that he exactly meant that, he said: "If we don't do now, history will not forgive us". He termed it (the deal) one of the most promising and viable way of bridging energy security for the future.
RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by Sanjay on Jul 06, 2008 01:24 AM Permalink
He said we have enough fuel uranium to power 10,000 MWe for forty years, but yet we don't have yet 10,000Mwe capacity yet? We also have ten percent of the world coal reserves yet we don't utilize them. We live in the tropics yet no solar energy. He also said without outside help we with commercial scale Fast breeder being made by 2010 we can have as much 500,000Mwe, without outside support because breeder reactor breed fuel.
Further By criminals and lies you cannot change what is written future governments will only be able to interpret what is written and nothing ls. Why the secret in IAEA agreement, why Pakistan and china can inspect our nuclear establishment know our technology they are too part of IAEA, also inspection of nuclear plants used to make bombs. So please tell why we will loose capacity for war, while Pakistan and China does not put any of their reactors under inspection that too international inspection.
Also why are we not guaranteed one once of Uranium by this agreement still US must go by its respective laws before giving anything in this agreement and we know how many times we were sanctioned by US.
RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by All Right on Jul 05, 2008 11:58 PM Permalink
All Acting Chiefs of all Indian Depts are Worth Believing (during the BJP tenure)!
These knickerwallahs are pathetic. They would have said the same of Abdul Kalam if he was still President
RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by Shirodkar on Jul 06, 2008 12:16 AM Permalink
they dont even accept views of Brajesh Mishra, their(BJP's) own National Security advisor.........how do expect them to listen to Anil Kakodkar, Kalam etc.
RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by TheOneAndOnly on Jul 06, 2008 12:14 AM Permalink
Aren't You Congis Traitors of India ? Spreading ALL Lies about yourself and your Leaders since Independence ?? So much so that Your Nehru had even Removed Columns from the Census Data ???!!!!
RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by prabhat mohanty on Jul 05, 2008 11:58 PM Permalink
- Atomic Energy Commission Chief Anil Kakodkar has been an involved party to Nuclear deal.
RE:RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by PKN on Jul 06, 2008 12:17 AM Permalink
So what he still draws his salary from the government of India ! He has only two options: Agree with the Government OR Put in his papers
RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by PKN on Jul 06, 2008 12:45 AM Permalink
Thanks for you Thanks . Would have been a smart comment if you knew that neither Brijesh Mishra nor Kalaam are government employees currently . Both of them dont draw salaries from the government curently .
RE:Not clinching N-deal will be a historical mistake
by PKN on Jul 06, 2008 12:14 AM Permalink
Prabhat mohanty, Stop being naive. Anil Kakodkar works for the government of India do you expect him to say anything differently.
Nobody is questioning the need for energy security what people are questioning is the 123 agreement and the Hyde Act.
India has refused to sign the CTBT - if all agrees that is right then how does one accept an agreement whereby we are prohibited from testing. Or if testing is not needed - Dr APJ Abdul Kalaam says why not sign the CTBT and get all the benefits that we get with the deal without riders? It is not whether Dr Singh is right or Advani is Right or Karat is right it is question of what is right for the country. As far as history not forgiving us is concerned there are too many things for which history will not forgive us- Messing up the Kashmir Issue, the defeat of 1962 etc etc. I don’t understand what AEC Chief means by saying ' bridge our energy security ' why is he not giving at least ball park figures of how much percentage of our energy requirements will be meet by Nuclear energy ? Or does he accept the figures of the Left- less than 2 % in the next one decade? This is not bath soap that somebody can sell using celebrity endorsement! The Government must come out with details of how India will actually benefit!
RE:SP is breaking for supporting Congress
by Joy Abraham on Jul 05, 2008 11:52 PM Permalink
This govt must FALL. For them USA and Gerge Bush are more important.
RE:SP is breaking for supporting Congress
by USamanta on Jul 06, 2008 12:00 AM Permalink
India needs prestigious tie with USA than become a slave of Bush, least popular man today. MMSingh and Congress is making big mistake by keeping most important issues secrete, not making public or getting parliament approval.
RE:SP is breaking for supporting Congress
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 12:05 AM Permalink
Knickerwallahs and Commies are in a state of denial. So humor them. Yes my friends the government falls tomorrow> Now sleep and have good dreams
A Christian party who put the cross on the two ruppee coin and the one ruppee thinks because
by Sanjay on Jul 05, 2008 11:47 PM Permalink | Hide replies
Hindus will be convince of the deal because some muslims are against it. First read the text of deal, and ask when pakistan and china are not allowing inspection prepetually on their nuclear plants, where there is no gaurante of supply of nuclear material, and exit clause which we will have to return all matrial supplied, unheard of. Further allowing inspctions on our nuclear plants mean a loss of nuclear plant for military or stragic purposes.
I say if Communist are against the deal they should have withdrawn much earlier, but they haven't, but they are there bcause there are groups who think communist are against so it must be good, Some think muslims are against so it much be good.This logic does not evaluate the text of the agreement which will remain important long after the government falls, or got reelected because the text means what it means and is not open to intrepition, that verbally it was said this and meant this to be written future governments will only have the text of deal to deal with. Should we believe the PM or the text of th agreemnt, should we not belive the PM speech to Parlimeent. Then whoseever opinion is not important as that of national interest and the text of the deal that will only be important in its operation. Further the agreement with IAEA is yet not in public domain.
Not even a village in India will allow a nuclear power plant to be built near them. If at all these plants are built, it will be built over the dead bodies of hundreds of protesters' similar to Nandigram. These plants are so dangerous that no European country except France has significant power generation from nuclear plants.
RE:Site selection for nuclear plant
by All Right on Jul 05, 2008 11:51 PM Permalink
Joy has a point. But some reactions:
1. Nuclear power has made France power surplus and a power exporter to surrounding European countries including UK, which in returns reduces their need to invest in power projects 2. Because of the French success story, nuclear plants are designed with better safety features than a decade or two back.
RE:Site selection for nuclear plant
by Joy Abraham on Jul 06, 2008 12:43 AM Permalink
Has this surplus power made UK suprior to France in anyway. France has not got even 75% influence UK has on global politics. In France petrol price is equal or slightly higher than UK.o what benefit this nuclear power has given to France? If they had no nuclear they would have developed power like UK or Germany. India should use: a) coal, b) Iran gas, c) remaining hydro, d) develop solar power in deserts of Rajastan. Rajastan deserts can give more solar power than the proposed dangerous nuclear power stations.