Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 707 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Vote Modi, Gay Modi
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 04:39 PM  Permalink
aBE E tALIBANI bHADUVA, KABUL JAAA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Betrayal of Cong
by sermuga pandian on Jul 06, 2008 03:48 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The Cong has betrayed that it kicked off those who hitherto supported them to sustain its minority UPA Govt for the last four years.But now it took new friendship with the SP to show its loyalty to imperialist USA Govt in pushing the Nuke deal with it.Cong is always a betrayer like this in the past too..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Betrayal of Cong
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 03:49 PM  Permalink
It is a party of traitors and animals

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Betrayal of Cong
by sibby mathews on Jul 06, 2008 04:01 PM  Permalink
The biggest traitors in India are big time thieves - those who relentlessly impoverish the country and people through their corrupt ways.

Every party in India has it's share of such big time traitors. The Congress, BJP and most regional parties are almost wholly dominated by them. It is a pity that the simpleton commoner underestimates the harm that such traitors can cause.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Betrayal of Cong
by Smeer on Jul 06, 2008 04:34 PM  Permalink
This N-deal is the preparation of future, when Rahul will get married and his child grown up and candidate for PM at that time this deal will come in force till than watch the PM and Mulyam.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Amar singh is Father of Nation
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 03:42 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Amar Singh is far more greater than Mhatma Gandhi. Fight against BJP is far more important than fight against British. He has left behind Gandhi.

History will remember him as a dummy of taliban who for personal interest sold nation to Taliban.

It is high time, we recognise his contribution and award Father of nation honour to him.

All Mujhrawallis of L:ucknow shall definitely support such a gesture.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Amar singh is Father of Nation
by Nilesh Mahadik on Jul 06, 2008 03:45 PM  Permalink
Poor muslim guy with poor thoughts...,

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Amar singh is Father of Nation
by secular on Jul 06, 2008 03:48 PM  Permalink
U may be Talibani. I hate that word and of course illegitimate issues of talibanis.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Classic insults for Amar Singh
by Suraj Singh on Jul 06, 2008 03:17 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire."
~Winston Churchill

"A modest little person, with much to be modest about."
~Winston Churchill

"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."
~Clarence Darrow

"He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary."
~William Faulkner (about Ernest Hemingway)

"Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words?"
~Ernest Hemingway (about William Faulkner)

"Thank you for sending me a copy of your book; I'll waste no time reading it."
~Moses Hadas

"He can compress the most words into the smallest idea of any man I know."
~Abraham Lincoln

"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it."
~Groucho Marx

"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it."
~Mark Twain

"He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends."
~Oscar Wilde

"I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend...
If you have one."
~George Bernard Shaw to Winston Churchill

"Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second...If there is one."
~Winston Churchill, in response.

"I feel so miserable without you; it's almost like having you here."
~Stephen Bishop

"He is a self-made man and worships his creator."
~John Bright

"I've just learned about his illness. Let's hope it's nothing trivial."
~ I

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Classic insults for Amar Singh
by Kamini Chadda on Jul 06, 2008 03:17 PM  Permalink

Ever heard of the saying that small people have big mouths?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Classic insults for Amar Singh
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 03:40 PM  Permalink
I don't think the people quoted above had big mouths...

Do you?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Classic insults for Amar Singh
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 04:08 PM  Permalink
My Clown

You seem to have a rather big mouth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Classic insults for Amar Singh
by Jitendra Kumar on Jul 06, 2008 04:12 PM  Permalink
We enjoy the shadow show.You are actually twin faced dragon

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Manmohan Singh resign
by Suraj Singh on Jul 06, 2008 03:14 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

You have lost face in India forget at the G8 by tying up with a crminal party like SP.
Stop actig likea nice guy and resign please.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Manmohan Singh resign
by Smeer on Jul 06, 2008 04:04 PM  Permalink
PM is know for unknown results so the SP is most recently result of congress and communist marriage so don't worry be happy and madam will take care of the newly born child.
So next year we all get invitation of birthday of this drama.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by MADAN GOPAL KAPOOR on Jul 06, 2008 03:05 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

In Buisness Line of 6.7.08, excerpts from a lecture by Dr. Anil Kakodkar, Atomic Energy Commission Chairman are reported at page 3.

Dr. Kakodkar writes and I quote ".. the country would have an energy deficit of 412 GWe in the next 42 years at the per capita consumption rate of 5000kwh a year. This cannot be met even after using all available domestic energy resources. Of all the non-coal based energy options, nuclear energy was the best bet but the country's ongoing nuclear programme badly needed to import uranium or reactors, which is possible only if the country signs the international cooperation agreement."

"History will not forgive us" if this is not done now, AEC Chief said.

Referring to 'Energy Gap' AEC Chief says "If India is unable to import nuclear reactors or nuclear fuel under international cooperation it must import coal to the tune of 1.6 billion tonnes in 2050 alone, unless solar capacity grows at even large levels". Subjecting a large country to the vegaries of such large coal imports on a regular basis would have shocking economic effects, AEC Chief said.

He says energy gap in 2050 can be bridged by importing 40-GWe capacity LWRs by 2012-20. The spent fule from these LWRs would be used for FBRs that will wipe out energy deficit by 2050.

A delay of a decade in importing these would create an energy deficit of 178GWe by 2050 and the coal import need would go up to .7 billion tonnes - twice the annual coal needed today, he says.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by Suraj Singh on Jul 06, 2008 03:15 PM  Permalink
Rubbish. Nuke energy will only supply 2%.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by shailendra lande on Jul 06, 2008 03:22 PM  Permalink
are you a nuclear energy expert ? ....when nuclear scientists and entire scientist community is saying that this deal is in our national interest. Then why party like BJP is opposing...they initiated the nuclear treaty when Jaswant Singh was foreign minister..they (USA) have been offerred much less... what they are offering now....why they are hiding their incapabilities....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 03:42 PM  Permalink
Bush seems to be an idiot... having signed a deal for much less with BJP, I dunno why he is now again signing it with Manmohan?

Any ideas, Lande?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by SHIMOGA SATISH on Jul 06, 2008 03:37 PM  Permalink
Dear Nr Shailendra Lande

This statement of BJP spokesperson Mr Ravi Shankar Prasad will answer your question of "Then why party like is opposing.

----------------------------------------------
"The BJP wants a good and friendly relationship with the US. We also want a strategic relationship. However, we shall not compromise on our nuclear deterrent authority. The energy component is a very insignificant component of the deal. It is 2.5 per cent now and will become 5 per cent in the coming 15-20 years with investment. The deal is a question of strategic ties. We believe that Indian atomic autonomy is a bi-product of political leadership and you may recall that post Pokhran II, there were sanctions on us from across the world. They wanted us to sign the CTBT and we refused. We don’t want to compromise on that legacy. The deal, in its current form, compromises our right to test."

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 04:12 PM  Permalink
What so legitimate about BJP's demand. They object to the deal on the specious argument that it does not permit us to test our nuclear weapons.

The operating word is in the event of nuclear testing. Even here the agreement provides an exception - the right to test if China or Pakistan tests.

No one in the nuclear community believes any more for the need to physically test. They now test through computer simulation using past test data.

This is the reason why Vajpayee government shrewdly went for a series of explosions (5 to be precise) - to generate such a data base.

Having done that Vajpayee gave an assurance to the world through his address to the General Assembly of the UN that India no longer needs to explode any nuclear devise.

So if we are take BJP's present position seriousily, was Vajpayee and BJP in 2000 lying to the world community?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Government relieved after SP support for trust vote.
by Smeer on Jul 06, 2008 04:09 PM  Permalink
You wrote such a long essay on atomic energy and wasted your energy.
Just go past when our FM has assured about our economy what happened till date its going reverse so its only good for magazines and news not for real life, but I appreciate for your honest efforts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
History repeats...
by Milind on Jul 06, 2008 03:04 PM  Permalink 

History is that India was suffering from the invaders and then the insecurity walked in and India was slowly and steadily torn apart by various forces and finally succumbed to the British force...

In todays scenario the socio political issue have made India so weak that it is very easy for congy monkeys and SP brokers to sale it to the hands of Americans...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amar Singh the rapist
by Suraj Singh on Jul 06, 2008 03:03 PM  Permalink 

Has numerous cases of muder and rape against him which has been supressed. Known only for hanging around the Bachchans.
Congress takes support of such guys just to say in power.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
GIVE DETAILS
by rocker on Jul 06, 2008 03:00 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

we want:

1.to give full detail of deal

2.to tell the cost which will be ultimately passed on consumers as cess.

3.what would be the tariff structure. this will result in absurd increase of power tariffs

4. how much power will be produced.

5. details of uranium reserves in the country..
there was an investigative report in HT that uranium reserves in india are enough to last 50 years and govt. is hiding this fact to buy expensive uranium from other countries and exchange money in between .

6.why can't untapped hydro,solar and wind sources of energy be used which will be less costly than uranium

anti common man cong should answer this.the idiot fake economists destructive trio of mm singh,p.chidambaram, and ms ahluwalia should answer this.shameless anti common man people




    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:GIVE DETAILS
by Kamini Chadda on Jul 06, 2008 03:01 PM  Permalink
Marriage brings out the animal in some men, usually the chicken


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:GIVE DETAILS
by rocker on Jul 06, 2008 03:10 PM  Permalink
how does it relate to my mail?or you had a fight with your husband and taking out your frustations here?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:GIVE DETAILS
by All Right on Jul 06, 2008 03:43 PM  Permalink
Marriage brings out the animal in chicken?

Which animal does it bring out?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:GIVE DETAILS
by Smeer on Jul 06, 2008 04:18 PM  Permalink
Don't ask for all this becoz congress do not want take all responsibilities of election which are not so far, so they are just making the mathematics to convince to the world that we are victim of SP and communist.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:GIVE DETAILS
by Cracknut on Jul 06, 2008 04:21 PM  Permalink
then if u think ur a better economists than those ppl uve insulted above, then y dont u step in ??


we'll be proud of u dear !!



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 707 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message