RE:Nuclear Deal is a No Clear Deal.
by George on Jul 05, 2008 04:14 PM Permalink
not clear to karat because and not a good idea for govt to give the details,because leftists are chinese spy...
Actually the deal is signing Non-Proliferation Treaty opened for signature on July 1, 1968.which is made to limit the spread of nuclear weapons.189 countries already signed..and 5 countries ( USA,Russia,UK,china and France ) already have nuclear weapons.4 countries not signed (india,pakistan,north korea and israel).India and Pakistan both possess and have openly tested nuclear bombs. Israel has had a policy of opacity regarding its own nuclear weapons program. North Korea acceded to the treaty, violated it, and later withdrew.These 4 countries face a ban on getting nuclear fuel and technology from other countries).Now bush administration taking interest to lift the ban from india and make india sign the treaty.
The danger is that pakistan have not signed it yet.They say they will do after india signs.Also USA and other 4 countries who owns the weapons have the right to do inspection on other countries by force if they suspect that the other country posess a nuclear weapon.The same they did with IRAQ ,claiming that they posess chemical weapon.Also if pakistan dont sign treaty ,they can do all sorts of nuclear tests and america wont mind that since america is unfairly suppying arms and funds to pakistan even if they know that pakistan is creating lots of terrorist activities against india. Thats why bush administration is trying their best to make india sign the treaty.I dont know why indian administrators are not taking note of these points and going ahead with the deal.
Amazing.... SP don't know about themselves...how they will know about N-deal.... they just want to resolve their personal issues...not more then that.....how to get rid from Bahan Mayawati.....
The most respectable person in india and our greatest every scientist Abdul kalam has told this nuclear is good and mandatory for india and india's growth.
In the interest of the nation, we have to sign it. Its good for the country.
Thanks to abdul kalaam.His respect in the country is at the peak now.
But today so called King makkers "communists" are rubbing their A$$ and dont know what to do. And communists image is totally spoiled in the country.Thats a good sign.
Second, so called third front is broken into pieces.Thats another good sign. Yesterday jeyalalitha left 3rd front.And now third front leader mulayam has gone to congress front.
Its a big blow to Chandrababu naidu. He is facing problems with TDP Telengana leaders.Now he is facing problems with Royalseema leaders. Many leaders yesterday vaccated TDP and joined chiru's party. And finally Mulayam gave a good blow to Naidu. Its time for naidu's retirement.
So this nuclear deal apart from securing nuclear resources for india,its doing many good things to the country.
1. Communists image is rubbed from the paper and needs to be searched. 2. Third front is lost, need a CIA enquiry to find that. 3. It prooved that Chandrababu is neither respected in center nor in Andhra state. 4. Finally it exposed the false patriotism of BJP and BJP leaders prooved that they are the worst oppurtunistic politicians. Great.Lets all give big hand to nuclear deal.
RE:Nuke deal did many good things to india
by True Voice on Jul 05, 2008 03:49 PM Permalink
Edward.. SWP is expecting a heavy payoff from your madam thru quothrocci (spellig??) or swiss banks. Pls give it off and give them a nice cabinet post. But your day dream on eliminating communists will never be successful
RE:Nuke deal did many good things to india
by sreeram srinivas on Jul 05, 2008 04:08 PM Permalink
Can the ex-President Dr. Kalam publicly join a debate withe eminent citizens and answer the queries than murmuring few gullibles into someone's ear ?? Surely, I respect him, but not the 4 wall murmurings....to the chosen few. He has a responsibility to publicly answer them with his knowledge.
RE:Nuke deal did many good things to india
by jagar singh on Jul 05, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
he has gone public with his views.you donot expect a former president come down to a college debate.
RE:Nuke deal did many good things to india
by md khan on Jul 05, 2008 04:05 PM Permalink
Yes you are right. former president is from BJP but he speaks what is best for country. We need Electricity to grow and to develop and we don't need testing N. Bomb.
RE:Nuke deal did many good things to india
by Prasanta Majumdar on Jul 05, 2008 03:59 PM Permalink
Can you tell me has any one objected to the deal for get Mr. Kalam, I a am lay man in this but I also know this deal is good for country. But the problem is I,Mr.Kalam,other citizen and parliatement don't know what are the conditions of the deal. Do you know the conditions ? so please don't drag Mr. Kalam in this.
We have seen that the politics in India is getting from bad to worse.There is no party which works for people of India...i mean not a single party.So many people in rediff keep blogging, why not start a new political party of educated people.It is possible.Let us decide on a particualr day all patriots who are development oriented converge in Mumbai- India gate and start a movement....pl do not redicule this suggestion
RE:why not start a new wave
by sreeram srinivas on Jul 05, 2008 04:10 PM Permalink
Yes agree. There are people who still say good people do cast their vote. The key point is when you do not have any genuine character standing for election, to whom you could vote....each party has all goons on their roles...then there is NO point in casting the vote. Change the laws...only 20% voting is not democracy...it is about failed democracy.
RE:why not start a new wave
by viren r doshi on Jul 05, 2008 03:35 PM Permalink
dear dilip simple solution is that whenever election come educated people should vote and every india should be active take out time for our country Please reply if i am wright
RE:why not start a new wave
by chandramouli sankaraseshan on Jul 05, 2008 03:40 PM Permalink
agreed...but in this scenario, whom will you vote for eg if you are in Mumbai....your choices will be Congress/NCP/Sena/BJP...or let's take you are from TN, the your choices are DMK/AIDMK/PMK/Independants....the need of the hour is an alternative for the voters.They should vote for able policy makers
RE:why not start a new wave
by ALOK DHOTEKAR on Jul 05, 2008 04:11 PM Permalink
My opinion on this suggestion is as follows :
1. The system is such that all political parties end up the same way... So a new political outfit will not result in anything new.
2. What is required that the voting percentage grows high... blacken the political affiliation and select the candidate most suitable for your candidate... that will mean next time every political party will select the best candidate
3. When thinking population comes to vote it will give courage to good, selfless and deserving candidates to contest the elections and result in class of committed and good politicians...
If a thought is given seriously to what i have suggested, I am sure the entire scene of politics will change in India... and India Superpower Vision for 2020 will be achieved..
May every voter realise.... EVERY VOTE MATTERS... thats the elixir
RE:SP is a political prost itute .dont beleive its words until get satisfied.
by Dinesh Rajdeo on Jul 05, 2008 03:30 PM Permalink
with so much U turn on continuous basis, one can say prostitutes are far better than our politician,the only solution possible is there should be only two parties, and election comission should derecgnise all other parties, this will help stop blackmailing by all these 3-4 member parties to major extent
RE:SP is a political prost itute .dont beleive its words until get satisfied.
by Soma Sagar on Jul 05, 2008 04:09 PM Permalink
Yes. Two major parties to be identified. Other all small parties must join any one of them. And there should not be any feasibility of withdrawing in between (5 years).
RE:SP is a political prost itute .dont beleive its words until get satisfied.
by jagar singh on Jul 05, 2008 04:27 PM Permalink
in a vast country,you want to reduce its variety into either /.or.i for one find cong,bjp or commies unacceptable.who do i vote? both israel and italy have large number of parties.they are developed countries.why not india?
MR L.K. ADVANI BEFORE MENTIONING ABOUT THE NO CONFIDENCE MOTION AGAINST DR. MAN MOHAN SINGH GOVERNMENT STANDS OBLIGATED TO THE NATION AS OPPOSITION LEADER TO MAKE HIS PARTY'S STAND ON THE NUCLEAR ISSUE.
Why SP is still undecided? Because against support they have demanded something, but it is not confirmed by ruling party. In INDIAN in politics all is fair to get something give something. And SP is such a shameless party who has demanded to give 2000 crore to Pakistan after nuclear test. SP is not samajwadi party but Sadely Party who is working for Pakistan. Never ever trust this people.
RE:SP offers not accepted by Sonia & Manmohan
by jagar singh on Jul 05, 2008 04:29 PM Permalink
in political compromises,there is always give and take.all democracies do that.deal is an example as well of this.
