RE:vajpayee
by devdass on Jul 05, 2008 01:21 PM Permalink
India's progress started during that rule. Communication revolution took place. Railway was reformed and turn around started.Govt god rid of non performing loss making Public sector cos. Infrastructure development got a big boost with launching of national highway projects. SEcurity got a big boost with Pokran. IT industry started booming. There was allround development. Inflation was under control.People were generally happy and progressing. Then came commie dictaed UPA rule. Everything got neutralised except railways!
RE:vajpayee
by ramji on Jul 05, 2008 01:15 PM Permalink
mr.ritwik i am sorry if you are below 10 yrs grow up after 18 you will know what is A,B,C,V etc etc
RE:vajpayee
by Prasad Nair on Jul 05, 2008 01:31 PM Permalink
dear ash, Vajpayee made our nation a nuclear superpower. From a Third World nation to a nuclear super power. I hope u rememeber that
Well, look at who is putting his both the legs into his mouth- it is none other then Fake Hindutavawadi & ardent worshipper of Father of Pakistan and two Nation proponent Mohamad Ali Jinnah: LK Adavani; because he has no issues to talk on the Indo-US Civil Nuclear deal. With authoritative stamp of India's Nuclear Icon Dr.APJ Abdul Kalam, the False hood campaign unleashed by Communists and our both electronic and print media is put to rest.
BJP and NDA dumped Dr.Kalam, once they used his talent for thier political survival; but Dr.Kalam is a true son of the soil, who identify's National interest first, rather then duplicite policy of BJPSanghParivar.
Whether Congress survives the Chinese agression through our fake Communist or not; Dr. ManMohan Singh and his Govt. has stood firm on the principle of National interest, for which, they are voted to power in 2004.
Indian National Congress alway did in the best interest of Nation; including the century old war to drive-out Britishers from India and secure Independence.
RE:HYPOCRATE LK ADVANI IS AT JOB!.
by tichkule bhaskar on Jul 05, 2008 01:13 PM Permalink
Sudhakar sir, from where you got this valuable information that NDA has dumped Kalam Sahab? Very good information, let the people know. Can you provide the source of information.
Manmohan Singh made a statement in which he implied that the "nuclear deal is not a big issue".
Criticism Manmohan Singh is often criticized by opposition parties (mainly BJP) by portraying him as the "weakest Prime Minister until now". The comment was made by Lal Krishna Advani after Manmohan Singh made a statement in which he implied that the "nuclear deal is not a big issue". [4] [5] Communist Parties (notably Somnath Chatterjee) have been criticising him since he got elected as Rajya Sabha member in 1991 from Assam. Their main argument was he is not eligible of becoming a Member of Parliament from a state where he does not reside. His statement about losing sleep on Hanif's arrest in Australia was also criticised a lot.[6]. Opposition asked whether he lost sleep when hundreds of people got killed in Hyderabad, Varanasi and Ajmer blasts. He is also the target of opposition due to the "Muslim appeasement" which the government is doing according to other political parties.[7] His statements like "Minorities, particularly the Muslims, have first right over the national resources" have also invited a lot of discussion in Indian print media [8] [9]
Kashmir being an internal matter and integral part of India, US and other western powers must urge Pakistan and China to vacate occupied Indian lands, in case they want to have anything to do with the nuclear deal. There need to be more temples built across Kashmir to encourage multiculturalism and true democracy, but unfortunately Congress shot down the land transfer to the Amarnath shrine and instead are giving subsidized houses to Muslims in Maharashtra. In case China deoccupies Kashmir, it will win lots of friends in the Olympic year, otherwise India should boycott beijing olympics
RE:Nuclear deal on our terms
by Suraj Singh on Jul 05, 2008 12:52 PM Permalink
anmohan Singh made a statement in which he implied that the "nuclear deal is not a big issue".
Criticism Manmohan Singh is often criticized by opposition parties (mainly BJP) by portraying him as the "weakest Prime Minister until now". The comment was made by Lal Krishna Advani after Manmohan Singh made a statement in which he implied that the "nuclear deal is not a big issue". [4] [5] Communist Parties (notably Somnath Chatterjee) have been criticising him since he got elected as Rajya Sabha member in 1991 from Assam. Their main argument was he is not eligible of becoming a Member of Parliament from a state where he does not reside. His statement about losing sleep on Hanif's arrest in Australia was also criticised a lot.[6]. Opposition asked whether he lost sleep when hundreds of people got killed in Hyderabad, Varanasi and Ajmer blasts. He is also the target of opposition due to the "Muslim appeasement" which the government is doing according to other political parties.[7] His statements like "Minorities, particularly the Muslims, have first right over the national resources" have also invited a lot of discussion in Indian print media [8] [9]
one and a half year ago when left threatened to withdraw support for first time and Manmohanjee agreed to review the deal i was sure upa will sign the deal and rule the remaining term also.left kept barking and now sp foolish ppl should be used to rule the remaining term.Rahuljee has already said nothing doing with SP at UP state level.
Instead Advani dare to seek non confidence on Man Mohan Govt. I don't understand why he does run away from the resposibility of Oppn Leader. Why Mr.Advani wants fire the arms from someone else's shoulder.
RE:Advani to seek non confidence
by Job KK on Jul 05, 2008 12:59 PM Permalink
Again Advani wants to ride the joy in Rath and to make disturbance in our country. So he is asking non-confidence. Now his age is too much please concentrate on your health instead of riding Rath.
RE:Advani to seek non confidence
by Mukund Thatte on Jul 05, 2008 01:21 PM Permalink
you are absolutely right mr.kk. the very very old leadership of bjp do not understand their true friends and enimies. had they support n'deal 18 months back this situation would not have arised. it is pitty on the part of old leaders of bjp that dr. manmohan has to take the support of Mulla Mulayam at the last movement. old leaders of bjp should have quit immediately after the defeat in 2004 polls. they are far more than power hungry.the party without principles(PWP)some times tie up with ramarao then with naidu, jailalita, anna, patnayak,mayawati,mulla mulayam!!
RE:AGE
by R Balasubramanian on Jul 05, 2008 12:56 PM Permalink
for progress of nation especially like us, the government servants should retire at maximum 55 years. In most of the government departments it is pathetic to see that, many servants who have crossed fifty years, just wade away time and does not take any responsibility as they fear it might have adverse effect on retirement and affect terminal benefits. With younger generations very competent and with high percentage of IQ should be inducted early in the service and should be given a free hand to take their own decision (ofcourse in the interest of the nation and people)and should not be intruded by scoundrel politicians.
Regarding age for MPs, first of all, there should be a minimum qualification fixed for MLAs and MPS - people contesting from Rural should have atleast Pre-University and from Urban atleast a Graduate. Bafoons and Pailwans should not be inducted and given important portfolios.
Can this happen? Yes - it is in the hands of electrate. Let us make this happen in the coming general election and take the country to further prospirity.
I agree that congress has brought stability to many things in the country. Examples: 1. Kashmir problem : created by idiot Nehru 2. Tibbet problem : ---do-- 3. Muslim problem : ---do-- by not asking moosalmaans to go to Pakistan when it was formed for them only. 4. Illiteracy : By not spending enough money to raise literacy status. 5. Poverity : by suppressing village and home industries and encouraging heavy industries only 6. Unemployment . . . The list is endless.
RE:Congress has brought stability
by ramachandran nair on Jul 05, 2008 12:52 PM Permalink
My dear Vijay -your existence is because of congress - what we have today is because of congress and its policies. You may not be aware of the history, please ask some senior people in your family, I am sure they would guide your properly. Only your ignorance on the subjected prompted you to write shabby things on our great Nehru, who is worshipped even after his death. You leave the dead ones alone. what you have got from other parties or party with a difference - only promise of building mandirs across india, which regretfully they could not do even when when ruled at the centre. This is dirty politics. Oppossing the things for the sake of opposition.
RE:Congress has brought stability
by ranjith v nambiar on Jul 05, 2008 01:18 PM Permalink
Mr.Ramachandran Nair, If you really go through Indian History You will never call Nehru 'Great'.Instead you will feel that he is a power hungry coward who was even envying his own shadow for success.It is because of Nehru that Kashmir is an International dispute today no doubt. There were 4 Princely states to annex to India in 1947 those three which were handled by Sardar Patel are parts of Indian union today and there is nothing called dispute in any of these states.but Nehru who was afraid of Sardar Patel taking over Kashmir annexure(Gandhiji had a liking for Sardar Patel too)approached United Nations and declared Kashmir as an International Dispute. So when you Go through History please do it impartially i mean not in a pro congress attitude. Everything that we have today including the suffering & terrorism(out come of Kashmir issue) and even the Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi is because of Congress especially under the leadership of Nehru family.
RE:Congress has brought stability
by NITIN on Jul 05, 2008 12:59 PM Permalink
Mr. Ramchandran Nair May be ur follower of Congress u r praising the congress no problem but as u r counting the gains of Congress. Take responsibilities of all failures of congress too.
RE:Congress has brought stability
by prakash dipshi on Jul 05, 2008 12:58 PM Permalink
And also the they have done a mistake by getting freedom and allowing people like you to talk like this
RE:Congress has brought stability
by nayakan on Jul 05, 2008 12:57 PM Permalink
Inflation was inevitable abd to control it we will require a good dictator. may be god only knows . People need to know that it was nothing much any govt. could have done anything in present global scenario.
ALL PARTIES KNOW THAT AND THEY ARE EXPLOITING THIS OPPORTUNITY TO THEIR FULLEST
Well Nuclear Deal if Dr. M Singh is able to pass -- HE WILL GET THE CREDIT AND YEARS .. YEARS PEOPLE OF INDIA WILL REMEMBER HIM he will become HERO..
THAT IS WHAT left , BJP , Mayawati .... do not want.
Congress is drained out and as it was before. there are few people with ideas still left and it is our M Singh and company.
