TELANGANA WILL BE BROUGHT BY ONLY SRI "K.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO". HE IS THE GREAT PERSON INSPIRED BY INDIRA GANDHI AND "MR.RAO" IS VERY GOOD IN LEADERSHIP QUALITIES "HE CAN ONLY BRING TELANGANA". HE IS GREATER VISION TO TELANGANA, HE CAN ONLY MAKE TELANGANA PEOPLE LEAVE WITH PEACE AND CAN EARN THEIR EARNINGS THROUGH THEIR INCENTIVES LIKE (COAL, IRRIGATIONS.....ETC...,). HE KNOWS HOW TO GET TELANGANA AND HOW TO BRING "BACKWARD PEOPLE AND SC&ST'S" FROM THEIR SORROWNESS(GRIEVANCES) TO HAPPINESS. AND CAN MAKE TELANGANA PEOPLE LIFT THEIR HEADS AND CAN WALK BRAVELY INFRONT OF PEOPLE WITH THEIR "TELANGANA STATE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY". THIS IS ALL DONE BY ONLY ONE AND ONLY ONE AND NONE OTHER THAN SRI "K.CHANDRASEKHAR RAO" THAT IS "TRS PARTY" (THIS PASSAGE MEAN THAT TELANGANA WILL COME BY ONLY WITH UNITY JOIN EVERY ONE "TRS PARTY" AND STRIVE HARD FOR THE TELANGANA STATE AND FORM "TELANGANA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY". THIS IS THE VISION OF "SRI K.CHANDRASEKHAR RAO)
Re: VISION AND VICTORY OF
by usreddy on Dec 20, 2009 12:28 AM Permalink
sir,He started the party, after he was ousted from the post of minister/speaker.His absence to DUTIES, WHEN he was minister(central)shows his dedication to a country.He was loyal to liquor and sleeping ,BUT HOW CAN POOR STUDENTS BELIEVED THIS DRUNKARD.SELECT A GOOD LEADER TO LEAD AGITATION.USR, CHEENNAI
There is lot of media coverage that chiru might enter politics. If he enters politics with development as the sole agenda will he be acceptable to telengana people. As most of the people see him as a person with clean image, future thinking and social service attitude will his guarantee for strong and developed telnegana acceptable to the people of telengana without separation from Andhra.
RE:RE:Will Chiranjeevi is acceptable to Telengan?
by khudabaksh on Feb 06, 2008 03:03 PM Permalink
no, Chiranjeevi can be CM of ANDHRA but not Telangana. we want Telangana. We do not want anymore Andhra CMs. Sanjeeva Reddy to YS Reddy all are Telangana looters and exploiters
RE:Will Chiranjeevi is acceptable to Telengan?
by MGR Fan on Feb 06, 2008 09:17 PM Permalink
Karunanidhi's grandson is ready to become CM of Telengana. Hope you consider him for the post.
RE:Will Chiranjeevi is acceptable to Telengan?
by Srinivas Guduru on Feb 12, 2008 03:53 AM Permalink
stupid? list me few lootings and exploitions. you guys r fools, KCR is pushing this for his personal agenda.
list few good things he has done for telangana personally.
I hope telengana comes to reality. So whats next? Will KCR put BC/SC guy as cm? god knows even if so, KCR will be the remote control. Slowly naxals on most districts and ISI fellows (nizam baksh- MIM/IML) together kills the peace and stability of telengana. Either all telugu speaking gets killed in this holocaust or become muslims to save lives.
Just remember....chattisgarh, jharkand, uttaranchal made no realistic progress till date after the sepearation
RE:Whats next
by khudabaksh on Feb 01, 2008 08:22 AM Permalink
how funn.... gujarat seperated from maharastra. punjab and harayana and himachal. so they are not developed.... increase your gk ,... eat kerala banana big one.... not two inch banana from coastal andhra.
RE:Whats next
by human on Feb 01, 2008 08:44 PM Permalink
You seem to annoyed for referring to your future plan with ISI... That doesnt mean the truth will change!!! Poor common man wil suffer at the end of all this
Re: WE WANT TELANGANA
by usreddy on Dec 20, 2009 12:36 AM Permalink
SIR, READ THE LIFE STORY OF KCR WITH YOUR ANALYSIS.HE WAS DRUNKARD, HUMAN TRAFFICKER AND DISSATISFIED POLITICIAN WHO ALWAYS NEED MONEY AND POWER.REMEMBER TO GIVE REPLY AFTER 10 YEARS OF YOUR YOUR KCR RULE IN POOR TELANGANA TO REDIFFMAIL.USR CHENNAI
That India has now one capital does not close the question.
If the Capital of India is not satisfactorily located, now is the time for considering the question.
Since the departure of the British, India has only one capital and that is Delhi. Before the British, India has always had two capitals.
During the Mughal period, India had Delhi as one Capital and Shrinagar in Kashmir as another Capital. the British came they too had two capitals, one was Calcutta and another was Simla. Even when they left Calcutta for Delhi, they retained Simla as their summer Capital.
The two capitals maintained by the Moghuls and by the British were the results of climatic conditions. Neither the British nor the Moghuls were able to live in Delhi or in Calcutta continuously for 12 months. The summer months in Delhi were unbearable to the Moghuls.They made Srinagar their second capital for summer months. The summer months in Calcutta were equally unbearable to the British. They therefore, established a second capital.
To these climatic conditions must now be added three other conditions. There was no popular Government when the Moghuls ruled or when the British ruled. Now we have popular Government and the convenience of the people is an important factor.
Delhi is most inconvenient to the people of the South. They suffer the most from cold as well as distance. Even the Northern people suffer in the summer months. They do not complain
RE:Here is an Article by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on Hyderabad
by Mahesh Tanneru on Jan 25, 2008 11:36 PM Permalink
Hyderabad fulfils all the requirements of a capital for India. Hyderabad is equidistant to all States. Any one who looks at the table of distances given below will realize it:-
From the defence point of view it would give safety to the Central Government. It is equidistant from all parts of India. It would give satisfaction to the South Indian people that their Government is sometimes with them.
The Government may remain in Delhi during winter months and during other months it can stay in Hyderabad. Hyderabad has all the amenities which Delhi has and it is a far better City than Delhi. It has all the grandeur which Delhi has. Buildings are going cheap and they are really beautiful buildings, far superior to those in Delhi.
They are all on sale. The only thing that is wanting is a Parliament House which the Government of India can easily build. It is a place in which Parliament can sit all the year round and work, which it cannot do in Delhi. I do not see what objection there can be in making Hyderabad a second capital of India.
It should be done right now while we are reorganising the States Hyderabad, Secunderabad and Bolarum should be constituted into a second Capital of India. Fortunately, it can be very easily done with satisfaction to the whole of South India to Maharashtra and to the Andhras. This is another remedy easing the tension between the North and the South.
400 years back Nizam and Telangana people built Hyderabad and developed with sweat and blood. Beautiful gardens, lakes, buildings, universities, hospital, airports, railways etc..
Andhra people came to Hyderabad in Lungi and without Chappal and now they want Hyderbad, how funny !!!!!!!!
RE:Andhra people came to Hyderabad in Lungi and without Chappal
by Welcome on Jan 25, 2008 09:12 PM Permalink
In a way you are right. Nizam used the blood and sweat of the people only to own all the assets. Everything you mentioned are the property of nizam and his bit...
RE:Andhra people came to Hyderabad in Lungi and without Chappal
by ratnajayant gudavally on Jan 31, 2008 10:54 AM Permalink
RE:Andhra wanted Chennai. 1953. Tamil Nadu said get out by ratnajayant gudavally on Jan 31, 2008 10:52 AM India wanted Nizams territory Nizam fought but India took and made it a part of India....... Now will Nizams fight and take it ??? will India give it ?
RE:Andhra people came to Hyderabad in Lungi and without Chappal
by Desi on Feb 04, 2008 09:25 PM Permalink
If they came in Lungi and without Chappal and now want Hyderabad, it goes to show how industrious they have become and how useless you have become!
RE:Andhra people came to Hyderabad in Lungi and without Chappal
by GRJ on Jul 03, 2008 08:58 PM Permalink
Yes, Nizam made telangana people build. Where were you khudabaksh ???
let the congress leaders ask their gurus in delhi, what is the leadership waiting for, 4 years and no decision, who is in indecision,and why not pullup the unfit decidrs, for creating rift and enemity among the people of india, why not take action against the leaders giving false hopes, and cheating the people.madam sonia gandhi is silent wants the telangana people to meditate on her so that she can listen to the call and give the telangana boon,i feel even if the high command and sonia gandhi wants also telangana it may not be possible because the people who have supllied funds to delhi and have become powerful, they are working like mafia. it is a telangana hijack programme
Gujarat wanted Mumbai. 1960. Maharastra said get out Andhra wanted Chennai. 1953. Tamil Nadu said get out Andhra wants Hyderbad. 2008/9. Telangana says get out.
No one is likes Andhra people, horrible characters. Looters and Exploiters. I have vomiting sensation when I say Andhra.
RE:Andhra wanted Chennai. 1953. Tamil Nadu said get out
by ratnajayant gudavally on Jan 31, 2008 10:52 AM Permalink
India wanted Nizams territory Nizam fought but India took and made ita part of India....... Now will Nizams fight and take it will India give it ?
RE:Andhra wanted Chennai. 1953. Tamil Nadu said get out
by Manikeshwar Thota on Jan 25, 2008 02:36 PM Permalink
ya these andhra guys will ask for ur underwear also..just be careful guys..
RE:Andhra wanted Chennai. 1953. Tamil Nadu said get out
by Indian on Jan 25, 2008 02:37 PM Permalink
are langa galla lara, miku edi cheta kadu kallu tagtam tappa, gudda musukora edavallara
RE:Andhra wanted Chennai. 1953. Tamil Nadu said get out
by GRJ on Jul 03, 2008 09:02 PM Permalink
I think, underware, Idli ,Dosa vada,,milk, fruits, rice sugar provisions came from andhra........they taught locals to clean backs with water not stones. Forgot....the stinking RTC buses ???
