I dont care what it was. Just go and check and find-out the feasibility. Navel Chief is just politicizing. He is from may be from RSS cadre just marketing the issue. Where Indians getting money. Where there is income. Where people will be benefitted, just check.
Why our engineers or fools. They are not qualified to check all this. This statement is just rubbish and just marketing the issue. If our engineers are not qualified, then fire all engineering colleges, I dont want such colleges to exist in my country.
RE:Sab Se Bada Rupiyyah
by asdf asdf on Jan 22, 2008 04:33 PM Permalink
You are from British Cadre. A british slave who is trying to achive on behalf of britishers.
RE:Sab Se Bada Rupiyyah
by Demo-crazy on Jan 22, 2008 05:04 PM Permalink
Wah Karunanidhi! How do you know Suresh Mehta is possibly an RSS cadre? Just because he expressed his view that the project is not viable for large ships?
TR Baalu of DMK is using that lie to sell the project. UPA allies are hand in glove with DMK swindlers.
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Jan 22, 2008 04:08 PM Permalink
True....Nothing like flying monkeys and 10-headed demons...LOL! How naive we Indians are! Such a shame!
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Rehana Khan on Jan 22, 2008 04:23 PM Permalink
Why we are not feeling proud of our national heritage irrespective of our religion? People like you have given Islam a bad name.
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Daiva Das on Jan 22, 2008 04:27 PM Permalink
We have lot of other national heritages, nobody is against to keep those monuments. But infliction of some mythical stories to block development is foolish and to support that is shere idiotic.
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by mangesh desai on Jan 22, 2008 04:27 PM Permalink
hi if all indians are like there will be no fight between any community... great keep it up. we are indians first... i wonder when this will happen in india
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Jacob on Jan 22, 2008 04:12 PM Permalink
Since you are not in a Muslim country (where censorship, intimidation and brute force are shamelessly employed to insulate Islam from criticism), you are still free to openly exercise our right to debate the merits of the Islamic value system against Western Liberalism.
RE:RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Daiva Das on Jan 22, 2008 04:28 PM Permalink
Don't try to fish from the Turbid water, Jacob. Think about Orissa and other attrocities against nuns
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Solid Man on Jan 22, 2008 04:52 PM Permalink
Against open fornication, calls for chasity and self-restraint and to wait till one gets married.>>>> ISLAM All for open fornication, no problems in people going out and having sex as many times as you wish without being married.>>> WESTERN LEBERALISM Against adultery, adultery to be punished as marriage is something very pure and a deep bond.>>ISLAM All for adultery, it is not to be punished at all, it is a free open choice of the couple and is perfectly legal and legitimate for a spouse to go and have an affair with other people, and even go to swinger parties!>>> WESTERN LEBERALISM Against the consumption of alcohol >>> ISLAM All for the consumption of alcohol, which leads to crazy drunk people on the streets who make clowns of themselves, as well as a lot of road accidents, and domestic violence. >>>WESTERN LEBERALISM Against the practice of gambling >>> ISLAM All for gambling which leads to several people losing their money which also leads to problems between the spouses and breakdown of the family >>> WESTERN LEBERALISM Against same sex marriages that leads to confusion, and which goes beyond the pale of human nature. >>> ISLAM All for same sex marriages, men marrying men, and even having kids! Leads to complete breakdown of the child's moral upbringing, how can a child have 2 fathers? A child needs a mother and vice versa a child needs a father as well.>>>> WESTERN LEBARALISM Calls for women to dress up moderately and to cover up for chasity. >>>ISLAM No su
RE:RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Solid Man on Jan 22, 2008 04:54 PM Permalink
Calls for women to dress up moderately and to cover up for chasity. >>>ISLAM No such thing as women covering up, women are encouraged to dress very lightly revealing a lot, while women who cover up are abused and banned from work-places and are called ?oppressed'>>> WESTERN LEBARALISM Against public disorder, offending and mocking and provoking others and respecting others people culture and ways. >>>ISLAM All for mocking, insulting, offending, and insulting other people under the excuse of ?free speech' while not respecting the culture and ways of other people, demanding others change for them or be deported!>>> WESTERN LEBARLISM Against pornography and prostitution.>>>ISLAM All for pornography and prostitution, both are legal ways of working in the secular way.>>>WESTERN LEBARALISM
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by JGN on Jan 22, 2008 05:01 PM Permalink
Solid Man, this month's issue of Readers Digest has an article on Ms. Mukhtar Mai (I hope you have heard her name). Pl read the same and then praise Islam for what it is truely worth!!!
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by Daiva Das on Jan 22, 2008 04:39 PM Permalink
Yes Jacob, censorship is there to prevent the spreading of nudity, brute force is employed to suppress criminals and to enusre a peaceful atmosphere for development and give employment to you your brothers uncles sisters
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by mangesh desai on Jan 22, 2008 04:10 PM Permalink
THE FACT IS NOT CORRECT: IF THIS PROJECT IS BUILT: 1) SHIPS WILL PASS THRU THIS CORRIDOR INCLUDING ALL INTERNATIONAL SHIPS AND SRI LANKS WILL BENEFIT MORE.
2) NOT ONLY THE NATURAL BRIDGE BUT ALSO THOUSANDS OF KILOMETERS OF LAND UNDER SES HAVE TO BE DEEPEND TO ACCOMODATE THE SAFE TRAVEL OF BIG SHIPS.
3) HOW WILL THERE BE DEVELOPEMNT OF TAMILNADU.
4)DO YOU THINK SHIPS WILL SAIL THRU THIS ROUTE UNLESS THE LTTE PROBLEM IS SOLVED.
5) THE PROTECTION THAT INDIA HAS DUE TO THE SHALLOW WATER OF THE SEA WILL BE LOST.
RE:Lankans & North Indians do not want TN to develop
by sanjay arun kumar on Jan 22, 2008 04:18 PM Permalink
Forget security aspect, even technically it is not feasible to take big ships through this 'setu route'. Moreover, except ships heading to Haldia port( Calcutta) , no international ship originating either from Cape Town (South Africa), Zanziwar (Tanjania) or Aden (Yeman) will use this route due to route inconvvenience.
Though I am a muslim, Ram is our ancestor & we are proud of his character. Indian govt. should protect the Ramsethu & hence safeguard the feelings of not only Hindus but also non-Hindus like me. Let me make it clear that the muslims like me have the history of only last 1500 years. Since Ram is an ancient figure with great character, this is an issue of national heritage & not only the heritage of Hindus. BJP has no business to hijack this issue. Ram belongs to all & not only to the BJP/RSS.
Some of my muslim brothers have questioned my identity as a muslim. I feel pity for them. I can say with evidance that my ancestors were not norn in West Asia & they were the local people here. Why should I believe in the Adam theory? I believe in Islam & I always try to link it with spirituality & peace. Let us use RamSethu as a bridge between our present & our past. I strongly urge the people not ot make Ram marginalised to a specific religion. Let us treat him as a national figure.
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Jan 22, 2008 04:09 PM Permalink
That theory and many more such sham theories are a making of the cowardly saffron mafia....Do not believe them
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by sanjay arun kumar on Jan 22, 2008 04:09 PM Permalink
I appreciate your feelings. Other than religeous feeling, Setu Project is neither economically viable nor ecologically sustainable. ultimately the people in Tamilnadu coastal area adjoining to project will suffer, once the project gets completed but remain 'dysfunctional'.
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by Sonu Madhavan on Jan 22, 2008 04:10 PM Permalink
thanks friend
ineed ram is a character which can teach human being to be a good human being not only Ram but all character had something to teach humans, so Ram belong to all of the India not just to Hindus
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by mangesh desai on Jan 22, 2008 04:15 PM Permalink
yes rehana you are correct people are making it a religious issues which they shouldnt. irrespective of our cast and creed we should protect what is there in our home. both the parties in support and opposing it are for there own interest only. why do Indians want to destroy a beautiful structure associated with us for more than 5000 years even if they dont believ that its not RAM made still it deserves to be there coz we are attached to it.
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by Demo-crazy on Jan 22, 2008 04:20 PM Permalink
Very encouraging thoughts.
Dear Muslim brothers and sisters, if you show your love and respect for the religious sentiments of your Hindu brothers and sisters, we will over come all such hurdles that are placed by politicians and narrow minded religious authorities on both sides.
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by aero florida on Jan 22, 2008 04:45 PM Permalink
my deepest respect to you brother.i have got an idea lets similar frequency people nomatter which relegion form A GROUP.WHAT DO U SAY?
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by Demo-crazy on Jan 22, 2008 04:56 PM Permalink
I agree. I recently came across an interesting report from Karnataka daily - in two villages the Moharram is celebrated by Hindus, even though the few muslim families which lived have left the place and are no more residing there.
The Hindu youth of the village pray on these days to Allah.
What we need is tolerance, love and mutual respect for practices of other religion and at the recognize that all religions are different paths to the same Supreme power. When one has this realization, there is no need for converting anyone.
RE:Ram is our ancestor
by Daiva Das on Jan 22, 2008 04:20 PM Permalink
Nobody is compelling you to believe in Adam theory. You must not proud to be a follower of a relegion of 1500 years histroy. But I have sympathy with you not because you are aware of ancient history, but because you are believing that the stories and myths as real and protraying a portion of sea and land as holy and don't do anything even if it is beneficial for human beings.
Do a google search on "Sri lanka banks on Ramayana based tourism"
You will note that there is enough and more.
Sri Lankan Tourism authority has done a wonderful job on it. Any one who had read Dr. Arthur C Clarke's writing he describes about Unawatune Bay in Galle. It appeared to be an ideal rocket launching site geographically and and he claims that that is where Lord Hanuman leaped to the sky. Native Sri Lankans know and believe and rever Ramayanana.
RE:Sri lanka banks on Ramayana based tourism
by asdf asdf on Jan 22, 2008 04:40 PM Permalink
Tathagat Mukherjee is not respected and a pure fiction. don't go thru these view, dont know from where these views came. But for sure Tathagat Mukherjee is a fiction.
we should do some more puja with BJP, JAya Subramnyama sway, cho and the gang leader kanchi seer and bring back the bridge and rename it as jaya-ram bridge as jaya and vicotry of ram, have a movie made on it with a duet song of jaya and kanchi seer and make it a super hit movie witht the bridge
If big ships can go through Suez Canal and Panama Canal, why is it not possible. What Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Suresh Mehta says doesn't make sense.
Sri Lanka is giving evidences about existence of Lord Rama and this fool Karunanidhi to get money via Sethuraman Project denies the existence of Lord Rama.
People of Tamil nadu keep him in power.Great keep it up
RE:this mad man Karunanidhi denies the existence of Lord Rama
by abcl on Jan 22, 2008 03:54 PM Permalink
U r correct but there are 15% of indian population is anti national due to them we suffer in our own land.
RE:this mad man Karunanidhi denies the existence of Lord Rama
by Daiva Das on Jan 22, 2008 04:07 PM Permalink
If not developmental please abandon the project. secondly If lord Ram ever existed, he should remain in people's heart. But don't become hysteric if somebody do Sethu's or Bridges
RE:this mad man Karunanidhi denies the existence of Lord Rama
by ralph nader on Jan 22, 2008 03:55 PM Permalink
the only time he remembers god is when he is being arrested or unwell!!!
RE:this mad man Karunanidhi denies the existence of Lord Rama
by mangesh desai on Jan 22, 2008 03:57 PM Permalink
yes you are correct. CBI should keep a close watch on the company getting this contract i am sure he will be one of the benefisciary. SRILANKA who will benefit more from this projetc yet they dont want to destroy this natural structure and we Indians... shame on us
