Who will prosecute who for Nandigram genocide ? It has/had been ordered and operated by Buddhadev Bhattacharya gangs from Writers Building and actively coordinated by Prakash Karat and Brinda karat.
Human Rights is asking guilty to punish himself which is never possible. Bangalees looking for the alternate to brutal killer CPM, but congress is active B team of CPM, and Mamata is worst than Mad. Crores of illegal bangladeshis are given ration card and voter ID by CPM to secure their vote bank and directly damage the fate of Begal and India as a whole, BJP's chance in Bengal is far from dream. So Bangalee has to suffer many more years unless Central Govt take immidiate action which is also impossible unler power-hunger Sonia Maino-MMSing Govt backed by CPM.
Where are the champions of democracy like Shabana Azmi, Javed Akhtar, Teesta Seetalvad, Bark A-Dutt, Pranoy Roy, Brinda Karat, Aamir Khan and the others.. why are they not raising their "powerful" voices ???
RE:Psst..
by Gautam Sinha on Jan 15, 2008 06:16 PM Permalink
they are hiding their faces under "secular fabric" Shame on you Pranoy Roy, you used to be a much polished , unbiased presenter when NDTV was launched on DD but now you are counted among hypocrites.
Sahadevan KK is conspicuous by his absence from this post. Now that CPM is in the dock here, he has no comments. Afterall he thinks that the Communists are the next rulers of India. Some hope!!
Nandigram was a blot for opposition who tried their level best for preventing development. Although u may raise eyebrows but the fact remains that other similiar incidents were of communal colour where as nandigram was the left's effort to develop and industrialise. please dont compare Nandigram with 92 or 2002 riots. One also needs to see that it was an honest effort by left to embrace capitalistic ideologies and also the underlying agendas for development. It was not intended to garner votes but rather create employment oppurtunities.
RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Hebbar R on Jan 15, 2008 05:48 PM Permalink
Pseudo justification. Typical of Communists!!!! You do not mind killing people for what you think is right?????
RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Uttamkumar Samanta on Jan 16, 2008 04:54 AM Permalink
Your CPM-baaps stopped and prevented development of bengal last 30 years. Who raised slogas against Tata and capitalists 30 years before ? your baap and partners of your m*.
Nandigram was a blot for opposition who tried their level best for preventing development. Although u may raise eyebrows but the fact remains that other similiar incidents were of communal colour where as nandigram was the left's effort to develop and industrialise. please dont compare Nandigram with 92 or 2002 riots. One also needs to see that it was an honest effort by left to embrace capitalistic ideologies and also the underlying agendas for development. It was not intended to garner votes but rather create employment oppurtunities.
RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Gautam Sinha on Jan 15, 2008 06:12 PM Permalink
Your post reeks of hypocrisy. Get your views of "honest effort of govt" and "capitalistic ideologies" corrected. State oppression comes in capitalistic ideology according to marxist books when profits no longer exist. In a true capitalist spirit, the industry should have been able to buy land in free market. Govt had no effort in this. Also all this violence and coercion was due to CPM goons and lack of action on part of govt agencies. So you guys behaved like the Ranvir Sena or how you thought capitalists behaved, not like capitalists. "not intended to garner votes"??? - is that why non CPM people were terrorised and eradicated? "create employment opportunities" - what were you doing all these days? In any case it is not govt but industries which do that.
RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Sultan on Jan 15, 2008 05:43 PM Permalink
BRANCHES OF FANATICS RA.SHTRIYA SWAYAM SEWAK SANGH (RS.S.) VISWA HINDU PARISHAD HINDU MUNNANI A.RYA SAMAJ SIVA SENA BHARATIYA JAINATA PARISHAD
**PROVINCIAL ARMED CONSTABULARY (PAC) This is one of the RSS Militant Police working under the banner of Indian Police Force made of only high caste Hindus. So far not even a single non -Hindu member has been recruited to this group which is getting a high pay (more than other police forces) and facilities fromthe Government of India. Mr. Khushwant Singh has the following to say in .HINDUSTAN TIMES. on this subject: .it is no longer any secret that the loss of life in both Delhi and Meerut was predominantly Muslim and the majority of victims were killed by bullets, fired by the police and the Provincial Armed constabulary. Our Government controlled media tried to camouflage this ugly truth.. Dr. Subramaniam Swamy, General Secretary Lok Dal (A) also conveyed the same view and went on fasting demanding a Central Inequity of the .STATE . SPONSORED GENOCIDE., of Muslims of Hashimpura in Meerut May last. Dr. Swamy says that the innocent people of Maliana village have ruthlessly gunned down. One finds himself unable to draw a line of distinction between the British India and Independent India. The onslaught that took place in Maliana is no less than the massacre of Jallian-wala Bagh. The brutality of PAC is no less than the brutality of General 0. Dyre. The incidents which are beyond imagination in democratic coun
RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Hebbar R on Jan 15, 2008 05:52 PM Permalink
Are you trying to say something about this News regarding Nandigram???
RE:RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Srinivas on Jan 15, 2008 07:09 PM Permalink
@ SULTAN MIAN An event of immense and lasting impact in Indian history was the advent of the Muslims in the north-west. Lured by tales of the fertile plains of the Punjab and the fabulous wealth of Hindu temples, Mahmud of Ghazni first attacked India in 1000 AD. Other raiders from Central Asia followed him. Hindus never forgot the repeated destruction of the Somnath Temple, the massacre of Buddhists at Nalanda, or the pogroms of the Mughals. Hindus gallantly resisted, knowing full well that defeat would mean a choice of economic discrimination via the jaziya tax on non- Muslims, forced conversion, or death. It is no wonder that the residents of Chittor, and countless other people over the length and breadth of Bharat, from present-day Afghanistan to present-day Bangladesh, thought it better to die gloriously rather than face cold-blooded slaughter.
RE:RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Srinivas on Jan 15, 2008 07:12 PM Permalink
Sir Vidiadhar S. Naipaul (1932 - ) Nobel laureate, He is the author of several books including Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions Among the Converted Peoples, Among the Believers: An Islamic Journey, and India: A Wounded Civilization. He has said: "India was wrecked and looted, not once but repeatedly by invaders with strong religious ideas, with a hatred of the religion of the people they were conquering. People read these accounts but they do not imaginatively understand the effects of conquest by an iconoclastic religion."
"India became the great land for Muslim adventurers and the peasantry bore this on their back, they were enslaved quite literally. It just went on like this from the 11th century onwards."
RE:RE:RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Srinivas on Jan 15, 2008 07:10 PM Permalink
@ SULTAN MIAN An event of immense and lasting impact in Indian history was the advent of the Muslims in the north-west. Lured by tales of the fertile plains of the Punjab and the fabulous wealth of Hindu temples, Mahmud of Ghazni first attacked India in 1000 AD. Other raiders from Central Asia followed him. Hindus never forgot the repeated destruction of the Somnath Temple, the massacre of Buddhists at Nalanda, or the pogroms of the Mughals. Hindus gallantly resisted, knowing full well that defeat would mean a choice of economic discrimination via the jaziya tax on non- Muslims, forced conversion, or death. It is no wonder that the residents of Chittor, and countless other people over the length and breadth of Bharat, from present-day Afghanistan to present-day Bangladesh, thought it better to die gloriously rather than face cold-blooded slaughter.
RE:Nandigram was a blot for opposition trying to prevent development
by Srinivas on Jan 15, 2008 07:07 PM Permalink
@SULTAN MIAN Hinduism remains a vibrant, cultural and religious force in the world today. To understand Hinduism, it is necessary that we examine its history and marvel at its sheer stamina to survive in spite of repeated attacks across India's borders, time and again, by Greeks, Shaks, Huns, Arabs, Pathans, Mongols, Portuguese, British etc. India gave shelter, acceptance, and freedom to all. But, in holy frenzy, millions of Hindus were slaughtered or proselytized. Their cities were pillaged and burnt, temples were destroyed and accumulated treasures of centuries carried off. Even under grievous persecutions from the ruling foreigners, the basics of its civilization remained undefiled and, as soon as the crises were over Hindus returned to the same old ways of searching for the perfection of the unknown. For no other country in the world from east to west, faces the agony that the Hindus in India have to face. They are the injured party; but even today they are crucified by the 'so called' secularists%u2014most of them themselves Hindus%u2014at every stage. No country in the world has been so ravaged and raped by outside forces as India has been down the centuries: Not Japan, not China, not Russia, none of the European countries, neither the Arab nations and certainly not the United States of America. Krishnadevaraya of the Vijayanagar Empire did not send his forces to Portugal to tear down churches, use force to convert Christians to Hinduism and indulge in religious terr
If Congress has the 1984 Sikh Riots Shiv Sena has the 1992-93 riots BJP has the 2002 Gujarat riots Why cant you allow Nandigram to CPM? Now every time a new riot or disturbance come up they will justify it with the other party's old black mark, and thus a reason not to investigate the current matter.
RE:Buddhhadeb MURDABAD!!!
by Gautam Sinha on Jan 15, 2008 06:03 PM Permalink
hey Abdullah you are prob in WB using these useless rhetorics. This kind of "michhil" slogans do not work anywhere now. Get a life, CPM is not the be all and end all of life. This time the oppression was large scale and caught on camera, earlier this was individally targetted and going on since last 20 years with no records.
Nandigram carnage was a result of maoist/naxal nexus... The left government tried their best to develop and industrialise but it was the opposition which prevented them from doing so.
RE:Nandigram carnage was a result of maoist/naxal nexus...
by Gautam Sinha on Jan 15, 2008 06:06 PM Permalink
And just what do you mean "best to develop" ? What did it do? Pulled out the militant CITU?
RE:Nandigram carnage was a result of maoist/naxal nexus...
by prashant on Jan 15, 2008 05:17 PM Permalink
That's typical commie BULL@HIT. Stop blaming others when your cadre was caught raping and looting in Nandigram. By saying the lie again and again , you can not change the facts. Wake up man and stop day dreaming!!!!
RE:Nandigram carnage was a result of maoist/naxal nexus...
by Gautam Sinha on Jan 15, 2008 06:05 PM Permalink
what prevented the govt from doing so from 1992? 15 years after India progresses Bengal thinks industrialization?? in the 60s it was said that what bengal thinks today India thinks tomorrow. See how backward your CPM is.
