Even without abuse alert, Rediff is happily censoring facts here. Shame! Shame! This has to be exposed by some media and exposed. High time, Rediff's true RSS colours is exposed.
RE:Rediff is censoring facts even before posting
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 07:58 PM Permalink
Rediff has censored again! the heights of RSS objectivity is being maintained here when one tries to post the link of a Pakistani newspaper which exposed Thackeray's links with Dawood. REdiff stop censoring. This is not RSS shakha.
RE:RE:Rediff is censoring facts even before posting
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 08:00 PM Permalink
Rediff's RSS censors and moderators are simply not allowing the hyperlink of a Pakistani newspaper article which exposed Dawood-Bal Thackeray connections to be posted here. Readers are warned.
RE:RE:RE:Rediff is censoring facts even before posting
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 08:02 PM Permalink
Those who wish to read in Pakistani newspaper Newsline about how Dawood and Bal Thackeray are great pals and business partners may simply Google : Ghulam Hasnain, Dawood, Thackeray and see the result. Rediff's RSS boys are censoring all this mercilessly.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Rediff is censoring facts even before posting
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 08:04 PM Permalink
Link of the particular Pakistani newspaper article was pasted here, but Rediff's RSS boys have censored it as usual.
RE:Openion
by manikkam anand on Jan 11, 2008 06:09 PM Permalink
If USA mediate the peace talk then they know what is going on srilanka and wont support srilanka govt.
RE:Openion
by Ram Bhakt on Jan 11, 2008 06:14 PM Permalink
First ask your Tamil brothers to mix up with Sinhala masses, learn Sinhala and compete with them economically, educationally and through use of brains instead of crying. One has to work for one's uplift and it cannot come by way of Govt reservation as in Tamil Nadu.
RE:Openion
by truthandonlytruth on Jan 11, 2008 07:08 PM Permalink
Aptly said... these tamil brothers need special provisions, reservations, special identifications, new country of their own, where ever they go and they cry and make others also cry!! Be a good human first and be a "Tamilian" next....
RE:Openion
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 07:10 PM Permalink
It is just the other way around. Thanks to Jaffna Tamils taking to British education, they were much better qualified than the Sinhalese who got jealous of the educated and competent Tamils and began discriminating against them to the point of attempting genocide against them. Not only that if you think the Sinhalese are friends of India, then you are sorely mistaken, because the Sinhala elite have nothing but contempt for India and dream of Balkanising India. In this regard, they are more like the Bangladeshi elite which also thinks along similar lines. For your information, there is no reservation in Sri Lanka. In fact, it is the other way around, the Sinhalese enjoy reservation even for bank loans. It is because the Sinhalese were planning to give Trincomalee to the Americans for a naval base, that Indira Gandhi set up guerrilla training camps for the Lankan Tamils. Kindly get your facts rights sir.
RE:RE:Openion
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 07:26 PM Permalink
Not only that, the Sinhalese take help from PAKISTAN to kill LTTE and India is quiet about Pakistan fishing in troubled waters, in India's backyard. When IPKF went to Lanka, Premadasa was given arms by ISI to kill Indian soldiers. The wily Premadasa passed on these arms not only to the Sinhalese Army but also got them to give these to the LTTE. The LTTE used these arms to kill Indians. This was totally unnecessary and avoidable. Then there was the late J N Dixit here who mischieviously MISadvised Rajiv Gandhi to lock up Prabhakaran in a Thimphu hotel room and forcibly sign the India-Lanka accord. Because of that Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by LTTE who did not like Sinhalese utilising Gandhi to butcher Tamils. Even this was done only at the behest of Ottavio Quattrochi of Bofors fame who wanted Rajiv Gandhi silenced so that the Bofors trail runs cold. Quattrochi met the late Anton Balasingham of the LTTE in a Paris hotel and paid a funds starved LTTE to kill Gandhi. LTTE or Lankan Tamils never had anythging whatsoever against India and even now LTTE wants to patch up with India for their own vested interest. If India is friendly, they can use Tamil Nadu as before. In fact, LTTE has been sending feelers to various Indian governments for quite sometime. Time will prove that the Sinhalese will betray India, just as Jayawardane and Premadasa did, by giving Pakistani weapons to LTTE to kill Indian soldiers.
RE:Openion
by on Jan 11, 2008 07:14 PM Permalink
Ram first try to know the full history of sri lanka and give suggestion,Tamils didnot start and conflict and was always ready for peace talk.. u know about sri lanka policy? have u being to srilanka? please dont write what ever comes to ur mind. and one more thing reservation is a differenet topic. for ur infoormation Tanil are the most want mathmatican and computer science enngg around the globe.. and in srilanka also tamil are majority of wealth people. so think and write something. bye
I doubt the real meaning of teh SL president , and his motive behind al this. May be to gain mileage at international level.
Still anyway, he has opened up. There shud b an international community to judge the situation and decide on the outcome.
On part of LTTE, its also shameful that they target the people. The people are already living under poverty, scare and by doing this they are not winning the public heart , which they should. Apart from this, they are taking money from Gora's. If they are provided an independent state, some gora country will be its God father and agian it will b a slave.
But its a wonder that people believe in religions so passionately, that they forget human values. What is teh diff in a tamil, muslim, or any other caste in world
Time has gone, when few opponents used to fight with the rulers with arms, today is the time to fight with votes. LTTE must come in the main stream of todays politics. India must not support any terrorist group, rather should support Sri Lanka Govt. for peace process. Peace process is only through negotiations and democratic means.
RE:RE:LTTE
by Ram Bhakt on Jan 11, 2008 06:06 PM Permalink
One does not have to live in Sri Lanka to condemn the terrorism of LTTE and one does not have to live in Punjab to condemn the terrorism unleashed by the Khalistanis not long ago.
RE:LTTE
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 07:38 PM Permalink
Yes, and one does not have to live in Assam to know what is UPPER CASTE SEPARATIST HINDU terrorism by ULFA. One also does not need to live in Manipur to know what is SEPARATIST HINDU UPPER CASTE LED terrorism. One also need not live in India to know that it was ISI which paid Advani through the hawala racket in which all politicians were involved. Dear Ram Bhakt, you figure out why Advani was being paid by ISI through hawala and why it was hushed up. Also you figure out why after getting paid such ISI money, why Advani praised JINNAH, the father of Pakistan. You should also try to figure out why Indira Ganshi was the one who manufactured Sant Bhindranwale much before the ISI helped him. But you will never improve even if you figure out all these things because this goes against your prejudice.
RE:RE:LTTE
by Fatema Begum on Jan 11, 2008 07:47 PM Permalink
Dear Rediff censorers, why are you simply using "This post has been permanently removed following an abuse alert"? Looks like you have been alerting yourself :D Why is it that you don't want to know that Hindu extremist figures have an ISI connection? After all isn't it common knowledge that even Togadia sends his kids to Christian convents? Rediff moderator seems to have Hindu prejudice. He is straight out of the shakha perhaps.
This process should be mediated by a strong international agency so that both the parties may not deviate from an agreed stand. That is most important. Tamils and Sinhalese have to co-exist in SL .... No way.
Its just a gimmick in response to LTTEs stmt of "we want the truce to continue". This current stmt from rajapakse is a little stunt. He is committed to wipeout Tamils. He believes this like paper stmts may help masking his international image, were just few days SL voting power was cancelled in UN for mount of human rights violation reports.
RE:Inconsistent
by Golden on Jan 11, 2008 05:22 PM Permalink
yes you are right. indian govt. should take some lesson from this and understand that only the bilateral talk can solve the issue of kashmir. our govt. should take action and stop all kind of atrocities in kashmir and solve this issue by talking to hurriat leaders and this will pave the way for the kashmiri pandits also to return to their home land.
RE:Inconsistent
by wajid ali on Jan 11, 2008 05:34 PM Permalink
Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?
Answer:
This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to declare a %u2018Middle Eastern conspiracy%u2019 behind the attack. The culprit was later identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces.
Let us analyze this allegation of %u2018fundamentalism%u2019 and %u2018terrorism%u2019
RE:RE:Inconsistent
by wajid ali on Jan 11, 2008 05:34 PM Permalink
I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist
I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world. There is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or is against the interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour misconceptions about Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be unfair or improper. This is due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam. If one critically analyzes the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot escape the fact that Islam is full of benefits both at the individual and collective levels.
RE:RE:RE:Inconsistent
by wajid ali on Jan 11, 2008 05:35 PM Permalink
Dictionary meaning of the word %u2018fundamentalist%u2019
According to Webster%u2019s dictionary %u2018fundamentalism%u2019 was a movement in American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes.
According to the Oxford dictionary %u2018fundamentalism%u2019 means %u2018strict maintenance of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam%u2019.
Today the moment a person uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim who is a terrorist.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Inconsistent
by wajid ali on Jan 11, 2008 05:36 PM Permalink
Every Muslim should be a terrorist
Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word %u2018terrorist%u2019 is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people.
RE:RE:Inconsistent
by jagdeep sidhu on Jan 11, 2008 05:46 PM Permalink
THe problem of muslim is not just in India friend. Why does all teh muslim people not boycott these jihad's. Let's open up a bit.
One Fish can spoil the entire pond, thats what is happening. No one among common civilaians want to fight. The fight is of bread/ living.
The problem is that everyone wants to be like western countries. When Arab world has such a rich reserve of oil, why it need to be dependednt on western world for living- simply because they dont want to work, and allow in turn these white chamri to dictate.
