If the UPA govt goes ahead with the sethu samudram project by breaking the RAm sethu bridge...then they will be held responsible for breaking the faith of the Majority Hindus.After the gujarath fiasco this action of the UPA govt wil only lead to the downfall of the congress...and the fall will be such that it may not be able to get up for many many years to come.....Hence be cautious and never get carried away by DMK or M.karunanidhi.
I am perplexed as suddenly how environmentlists appeared to oppose to this project,as they feel this would affect marine life. I appreciate, if they can provide us any environmental impact assessment study report, recently carried out which has proved major adverse effect on marine Environment.
RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by Singh on Jan 10, 2008 11:15 PM Permalink
I odnt think this project is a good idea not because of religious reasons but because it will not provode much savings.. no big tankers can cross, repeated dredging will be needed and tankers coming from long distances will not be saving much time... overall more hassle and cost than benefits. This project doesn't seem to justify the benefits with costs. Government should publish all its plans and cost benefit analysis for people so that they can clearly understand the logic behind it
RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by Kolhapuri on Jan 10, 2008 10:46 PM Permalink
Environmentalist have more brains than communists. Surely they know what they are saying.
RE:RE:RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by venkat on Jan 10, 2008 11:04 PM Permalink
Yes, Hanuman act is also as good as Prophet Mohammad ascending heaven to meet Allah by ladder or rope. Please do not ridicule beliefs of others. You muslims will kill any fellow who act as Mohammad (in order to show his good deeds) citing nonsense written from texts. No wonder, there is no film on Prophet Mohammad and his good work.
RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by Neer on Jan 10, 2008 11:52 PM Permalink
@ Mukhtar Ali
At least it is better than praying Muhhamed. We are praying someone who acts were good which itself state that we praise the good.Look who you are idolizing as....
RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by venkat on Jan 10, 2008 11:02 PM Permalink
Please tell us the immense economic gain... No big tanker can cross the channel and it is clearly well stated. Also repeated dredging needs to be undertaken due to sand silts being formed by frequent cyclones. Only small Indian ships can cross and that too it takes hell lot of time to be pulled via the channel. They are better off circumventing Sri Lanka
RE:RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by Neer on Jan 10, 2008 11:54 PM Permalink
Also, How much this will cost?? Isn't it better to inprove to the infrastructure within the country (from the money)than outside it.
RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by Ganesh Das on Jan 10, 2008 11:14 PM Permalink
Ram setu cannot be touched.Congress(Sonia) and Karunanidhi will be in big trouble if they dare to hurt moderate Hindus to appease terrorist muslims.
RE:Ram Sethu Controversy
by PKN on Jan 10, 2008 11:15 PM Permalink
I am also perplexed as to why you assumed that environmentalists started objecting on this today. The truth is that they have objected ever since the the project was initailly disussed. Now with the UPA getting ready to implement it they have merely beocme more vocal. When it comes to making such major changes in the environment it is important an environmental impact study is done before the project is approved . Not that the government goes ahead and environmentalist have the task of proving the action as being injurious to the environment.
