Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 235 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Its our fault
by grir reeg on Feb 28, 2008 11:25 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Today the country lacks Lord Ram to crush the heads of Ravan poping up in China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Sri Lanka, Burma, Middle East and other parts of India and the world. Today's impotent brainwashed generation is totally at the mercy of secularists and communists. Its our mistake from generations that we bowed reverentially to every aggressor. We allowed gave up our Dharma and adopted culture of invaders, which has resulted in the present anarchy. If Indians had fought for their rights, the world would have been a peaceful place today without the scourge of terrorism.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Its our fault
by Herman Hermit on Feb 28, 2008 08:39 PM  Permalink
USA did not need Lord Ram to become a super power but all Lord Ramites from India are flocking to Jesus land .Why? lol

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Its our fault
by samarjit on Feb 28, 2008 05:21 PM  Permalink
Naren Bhai is there....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
CPI(M) & Brajesh are saying same
by srinivasan sathya on Feb 28, 2008 11:08 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

CPI(M) & Brajesh are saying but in different words & silence.

Brajesh said:
Yes, if the deal goes through on the basis of the 123 Agreement and on the basis of the clean exemption from NSG without qualification I think that will be good for India and not just for the US only.

So, CPI(M) just wish to see if India is able to get clean exemption from IAEA which impacts Non-US countries; 123 Agreement is soft form of Hyde Act which impacts only with US.

I think if India gets clean exemption from IAEA, CPI(M) may agree to it & i presume for that reason only they allowed Govt to negotiate with IAEA. It is matured approach.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:CPI(M) & Brajesh are saying same
by Sahadevan KK on Feb 28, 2008 11:27 AM  Permalink
Don't try to paint Brijesh. He is in the same dust bin where is BJP today.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Why suddenly
by sg sg on Feb 28, 2008 10:12 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I cant understand the U trun made by Mishra. Id like to know what new information he has access to that has changed his mind. We as a nation can change to provided it is told clearly that we will get to retain our rights to conduct further nuclear tests without any sanctions being imposed on us, and none of our present sites will be open for inspection. Is the US lobbying with people like Mishra, if so why and for what in return. We need the deal for our growth but not at the cost of binding ourselves for the ever on the nuclear front.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why suddenly
by satya pal on Feb 28, 2008 10:36 AM  Permalink
no individual shall be trusted.what is the cost of electricity generated compared to alternative energy sources.india will be permanently crippled.becomes a second grade nation.no say in internatioal and non aligned countries.beware of usa game.right to conduct minimum deterrent tests shall be protected.god bless these type of thinkers and philosphers.india is slow thinker and slow implementer of policies.no where in advanced technology we are independent.very poor in defence production.dependent on foreign suppliers.method of teaching and practice of engineering/technology are out dated.salary structure are poor for technocrats.all want to run abroad.govt should involve private sector in to production.tata's,ashok leyland and mahindra can be associated in production.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why suddenly
by Sahadevan KK on Feb 28, 2008 10:57 AM  Permalink
Conversion rate of US$ is decreasing...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Is Brajesh Mishra showing his true loyalities to congress, but he contradicts himself when he said congress was against nuclear testing in 1998, stragic program.
by Sanjay on Feb 28, 2008 06:00 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Inspection without any guarantee of supply, and the right of return is certainly not in India's interest. Further a person who is knowledgeable about our nuclear program, knows like imported oil, imported technology is of long term dependence not independence, especially since our nuclear program has reached the third stage as we are building a thorium based nuclear power plant called AHWR 11th plan, and by 2010 we will have a fast breeder reactor operating, plus three more of these breeders in the 11th plan. Therefore, with the breeder technology we will have the ability to produce from 10,000 Mwe to 500,000 MWE energy with breeder technology. Further, inspection our nuclear plants PHWR which are used to produce plutonium, will mean that plutonium cannot be used in strategic program, Also inspection of reprocessing of nuclear fuel under inspection. Also the nuclear plants used to make the bomb under inspection.
igcar.ernet.in/press_releases/press11.htm

How does one say there is any benefit to our country when we have broke free of sanction, when history have shown imported part have damaged reactor. No country of any power will allow anyone to inspect their plants that are made by their own technology, especially those nuclear plants that were used to make the bomb.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Is Brajesh Mishra showing his true loyalities to congress, but he contradicts himself when he said congress was against nuclear testing in 1998, stragic program.
by Harimau Iyer on Feb 28, 2008 09:09 AM  Permalink
Yes, we have been building this Fast Breeder for the last 20 years and every time it is going to be ready in the next two years!

Have you even read up on the Thorium cycle before writing this crap? Thorium does not fission fast enough for use in a reactor. You need to mix it with Plutonium. Yes, the same plutonium that is in short supply and is used in our nuclear bombs. Are we going to dismantle our bombs and take out the plutonium to build this fast breeder?

The only fast breeder India produces is its people....particularly, cretins. Just look at our politicians, our population and all those idiots who are spouting about "indigenous technology" without a clue about what that technology involves.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Best way to move forward the indo-us relationship is to delink the deal
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 28, 2008 05:36 AM  Permalink 


Its too late for the N-deal, rightly said Advani.

Congress slept on this, did not approach BJP to settle political score.

On another end, Congress is worried for muslim vote and commies.

The IE says: Advani said that neither side should be perturbed about the stalemate over the nuclear deal or any one particular issue. The BJP leader also told the US official that the fate of the deal should also be viewed in terms of the nature of the ruling alliance. Gates asked Advani whether the situation could be rectified. Advani is learnt to have told him it was 'too late'.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
India need the deal A solution for the commies:)
by snpost on Feb 28, 2008 03:03 AM  Permalink 

India need this Nuclear deal to move forward in securing the necessary tecnology and fuel to develop and modernise. Its a must for the 1 billion population. We have to accept changes and welcome it.
Indian can kill two birds with one stone- India will always needs labourers to work in the field. The Indian commies can be guaranteed job in the green fiels of India. This should keep them in touch within the communes of their ideology. Unless of course, they prefer the green fields of China :)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mishra on Nuclear Deal
by on Feb 28, 2008 02:28 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Brajesh Mishra has given multi-faceted perspectives in favor of the nuclear deal which would vanish if not revived by July. This would be hisroric in Indo-US relations and would impact Indian Economy and balance of power in the region. Inda has to play a Lion to face the Chinese Dragon. Judge Mr. Mishra's evaluation from the strategic role Inda plays in the region. India must buy military hardware from US, UK, and France on copetitive terms. Open relationship with NSG countries will enhance India's voice heard faster at the UN. I comend Mr Mishra' objective and non-political evalation of the current impasse and dilemma India is facing in regards to the Nuclear Deal.

Sat Paul Goyal
SAIS, Johns Hopkins University
Washington DC

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Mishra on Nuclear Deal
by Jayaprakash K on Feb 28, 2008 12:32 PM  Permalink
There is a reason behind why he is showing multi faced!. First he could not hide the reality he knows n-deal is a good thing for india's future. Second he is very much loyal to BJP that make him reverse.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sheela Bhat is a disgrace to principled journalism
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 28, 2008 01:25 AM  Permalink 

She wrote all those crap prior to Guj 2007 election.

Claimed, those were based on actual situation on the ground.

However, after the results were out, she was proved horribly wrong.

We need an apology from her.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
hyde act
by prakash on Feb 28, 2008 12:56 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

can some thro light on this? how it is going to affect 123 agreement and its effect on India's nuclear arsenal...

once we sort out hyde act , we can go ahead with 123 agreemnt AFAIK...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:hyde act
by apjunkmail on Feb 28, 2008 01:48 AM  Permalink
Rice does not Hyde the truth

The US secretary of state has laid bare the centrality of the controversial Hyde Act. The Nuclear Suppliers%u2019 Group, like the U.S., is likely to grant India, at best, only a narrow, conditional waiver from its rules.

Brahma Chellaney

Asian Age, February 18, 2008



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 235 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message