This cheap comrades love red flagged countries than India,they are chinese and cuba spies,US may not be trust ful partner but it is necesassory for us to sign the deal because our diplomats knew well how to make our countries dos and donts better than these comrades who is good for nothing.
RE:The love of comrades
by SHAAN on Feb 26, 2008 05:06 AM Permalink
Yes you are absolutely right George. These stupids are always against the development. Once the cpuntry is developed and privatised there will not be any party man to hold their stamps. Thats their main worry. Wise men on the top and fools under as comrades.
N-deal depends not only Technology we look for, but also nuclear fuel for which India need to depend on USA and other countries. So the N-deal does not confirm the continueous supply of fuels without any obligation. Another part I pointed out is it is not only nuclear test related to atom bomb (India may require to combact untrusty China) will be restricted by the Hyde-Act but also any sub-nuclear test (critical for Indian's soverignity of self-reliance on its own) will be restricted. So USA is trying to secure NPT (Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons test) through the back-door. So this issue should be cleared first before signing. Lastly does UPA has guts to communists over any issue ? If not, it (and overall India) will face trouble off and on.
These commies think that Indian public's IQ is at the same level as their cadre. They are telling UPA to choose between N-Deal and Government and they are doing that in the last six months of this government. Man, these guys think we are stupid. But yes, I don't doubt the intelligence levels of our Kerala and W. Bengal brothers who send these idiots to Loksabha.
US is giving technoloy to India but restricting India from going any future nuclear test (Hyde-act). If India does any test in future, then there will be TOUGH SANCTION against India. India cannot digest, because all nuclear power plants will be sitting idle and its productivity (i.e. energy) and overall future of many employees' family.
RE:US is giving technoloy to India but restricting India from going any future nuclear test (Hyde-act).
by snpost on Feb 26, 2008 01:18 AM Permalink
What are you on about? We donot have the technology yet to develop these nuclear plants- why you talking of running, when India has start walking in terms of Nuclear technology?
RE:US is giving technoloy to India but restricting India from going any future nuclear test (Hyde-act).
by Uttamkumar Samanta on Feb 26, 2008 03:31 AM Permalink
N-deal depends not only Technology, but also nuclear fuel for which India need to depend on USA and other countries. So the N-deal does not confirm the continueous supply of fuels without any obligation. Another part as I pointed out is it is not only nuclear test related to atom bomb (India may require to combact untrusty China) will be restricted by the Hyde-Act but also any sub-nuclear test (critical for Indian's soverignity of self-reliance on its own) will be restricted. So USA is trying to secure NPT (Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons test) through the back-door. So this issue should be cleared first.
RE:US is giving technoloy to India but restricting India from going any future nuclear test (Hyde-act).
by I Love Rediff craps on Feb 26, 2008 03:44 AM Permalink
Yes,we should drop Sachin for 2morro's game
Its a Drama doing on. In doing so Communists want to manage all cases against them over Singur, Nandigram etc. If they want to withdraw support, then why are they waiting till N-deal is signed. It is clear that Congress will sign it. If Communists think N-deal is so bad for the country, then they should STOP this Govt before signing it. That's not going to happen, because its purely a honeymoon drama going on.
USA MUST 1st STOP SUPPORTING AND PROVIDING LARGE SUMS OF MONEY AND ARMS TO TERRORIST PAKISTAN ,BEFORE INDIA LOOKS AT HOW GOOD IS THE DEAL FOR THEM.....
RE:SIMBA40
by snpost on Feb 26, 2008 12:47 AM Permalink
hey Simdad, What does it matter if the US is giving Pakistan arm to kill each other there. That's there problem. The US is giving India technology to develop and meet our futrure energy need. Are you from paklstan?
RE:RE:SIMBA40
by TIGER MAN on Feb 26, 2008 12:53 AM Permalink
snpost...USA HAS ALWAYS PROVIDED PAKISTAN WITH LARGE SUMS OF ARMS AND MONEY....EVEN IN THE 1971...INDO_PAK WAR....USA THREATED INDIA...THAT THEY WILL BOMB INDIA WITH NEUCLEAR BOMBS IF INDIA DID NOT GET OUT OF USA .EVEN TODAY IN THE PRETEX OF FIGHTING TERRORIST STATES ,THE BIGGEST TERRORIST STATE..PAKISTAN IS AN ALLY OF USA.... SO HOW MUCH CAN YOU EVER TRUST USA....
RE:RE:RE:SIMBA40
by TIGER MAN on Feb 26, 2008 12:54 AM Permalink
snpost...USA HAS ALWAYS PROVIDED PAKISTAN WITH LARGE SUMS OF ARMS AND MONEY....EVEN IN THE 1971...INDO_PAK WAR....USA THREATED INDIA...THAT THEY WILL BOMB INDIA WITH NEUCLEAR BOMBS IF INDIA DID NOT GET OUT OF PAKISTAN .EVEN TODAY IN THE PRETEX OF FIGHTING TERRORIST STATES ,THE BIGGEST TERRORIST STATE..PAKISTAN IS AN ALLY OF USA.... SO HOW MUCH CAN YOU EVER TRUST USA....
RE:SIMBA40
by Uttamkumar Samanta on Feb 26, 2008 12:55 AM Permalink
US is giving technoloy to India but restricting India from going any future nuclear test (Hyde-act). If India does any test in future, then there will be TOUGH SANCTION against India. India cannot digest, because all nuclear power plants will be sitting idle and its productivity (i.e. energy) and overall future of many employees' family.
RE:SIMBA40
by TIGER MAN on Feb 26, 2008 01:01 AM Permalink
Uttamkumar Samanta...You are right in a number of things ...Well USA has large stockpiles of Nuclear Bombs and they have no intention of reducing their stockpiles .But they have always tried to block India for enlarging its Neuclear arson ....Whom does USA want to use its large stokpiles of Neuclear Bombs on.....
Yah, our policy-makers should think deeply instead of cheap politics. Since beginig MMShing is doing what USA or multinational companies are telling him to do. At least this is the times UPA (particularly congress) should come clean with thorough public debate.
RE:SIMBA40
by snpost on Feb 26, 2008 01:16 AM Permalink
We are talking of securing the technology to develop India future energy need- India has already develop nuclear weapon - it the knowhow to use nuclear energy to bring progress to India that is needed. The US will provide the knowhow, but its up to India to learn and use it to progress. Why you guys going on about nuclear bombs instead ? To Tiger man Trust in terms of politics - we have learn the Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai approach. When you go a buy a car in a showroom, you use your judgement not because you trust the salesman- who just want to make a comission.
N-deal depends not only Technology, but also nuclear fuel for which India need to depend on USA and other countries. So the N-deal does not confirm the continueous supply of fuels without any obligation. Another part as I pointed out is it is not only nuclear test related to atom bomb (India may require to combact untrusty China) will be restricted by the Hyde-Act but also any sub-nuclear test (critical for Indian's soverignity of self-reliance on its own) will be restricted. So USA is trying to secure NPT (Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons test) through the back-door. So this issue should be cleared first.
RE:SIMBA40
by RAJA on Feb 26, 2008 04:39 AM Permalink
snpost...WELL THEY DID HINDU CHINI BHAI BHAI...IN 1962 AND CHINA GRABBED A BIG CHUNK OF INDIA....
ul·ti·ma·tum /%u02CC%u028Clt%u0259%u02C8me%u026At%u0259m, -%u02C8m%u0251-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uhl-tuh-mey-tuhm, -mah-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation %u2013noun, plural -tums, -ta /-t%u0259/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[-tuh] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation. 1. a final, uncompromising demand or set of terms issued by a party to a dispute, the rejection of which may lead to a severance of relations or to the use of force. 2. a final proposal or statement of conditions
So, far, Left must have given 100's "ultimatums" to UPA....:-)
Its a Drama doing on. In doing so Communists want to manage all cases against them over Singur, Nandigram etc. If they want to withdraw, why are they waiting till N-deal is signed. It is clear that Congress will sign it. If Communists think N-deal is so bad for the country, then they should STOP this Govt before signing it. That's not going to happen, because its purely a honeymoon drama going on.
